Swirling and cavitating flow suppression in a cryogenic liquid turbine expander through geometric optimization

Abstract

A single-stage cryogenic liquid turbine expander is developed as a replacement of Joule–Thompson valve in the internal compression air separation unit for energy-saving purpose. Flow analysis and optimization is conducted for the turbine expander. With the original geometry, static pressure drops gradually from the nozzle to impeller together with a 2.7 K temperature drop, which exhibits simultaneously a smooth throttling characteristic and cryogenic refrigeration effect. However, similar to the conventional hydraulic turbine, a vortex-rope is apparently formed around the draft tube centerline. It leads to considerable mechanical energy dissipation and, subsequently, a local pressure drop and temperature rise, which have made the turbine expander vulnerable to cavitation. The draft tube vortex swirling flow has been found to be sensitive to exit geometric shape of rotating impeller. To suppress the swirling flow and cavitation, design optimization of impeller geometric shape is further conducted with an efficient global optimization method developed by the authors, where in particular, an innovative optimization objective function and a simultaneous tuning of both impeller meridian profile and blade shape are incorporated. The former is a linear combination of the draft tube loss factor and normalized impeller exit static pressure. It depicts the draft tube swirling flow behavior and also captures somehow the cavitation flow physics. The latter permits a very flexible variation of the impeller geometry. Such a highly nonlinear problem is solved by the global optimization algorithm, in which the Kriging surrogate model is used but updated through adaptive sampling. It is demonstrated that with the optimized geometry, the vortex-rope like characteristics has diminished apparently and both scale and intensity of swirling region are reduced significantly. As a result, the low static pressure region has shrunk and the local temperature rise is reduced and, subsequently, the cavitation is effectively suppressed.

Keywords

Air separation unit cryogenic liquid turbine expander draft tube computational fluid dynamics cryogenic cavitation swirling flow suppression global optimization adaptive sampling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chiu C-H and Kimmel HE. Turbo-expander technology development for LNG plants. In: The 13th International conference & exhibition on liquefied natural gas, Seoul, Korea, 2001, p. 37.

Kimmel

. Speed controlled turbines for power recovery in cryogenic and chemical processing. World Pumps 1997; 369: 46–49.

Hudson HM, Wilkinson J, Cuellar K, et al. Integrated liquids recovery technology improves LNG production efficiency. In: 82nd Annual convention of the gas processors association, 2003.

Johnson

. Improvement of natural gas liquefaction processes by using liquid turbines. Fuel Energy Abstracts 1998; 39: 51.

Haesloop

Kimmel

. Improved cryogenic gas processing efficiency due to advancements in liquid turbine expanders, New York, NY: American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1998.

Habets

Kimmel

. Economics of cryogenic turbine expanders. Int J Hydrocarbon Eng 1998, pp. 99.

Kimmel

. Cryogenic LNG expanders reduce natural gas liquefaction costs. Natural gas logistics, handling and contracts, Bali, Indonesia, 2011, pp. 18–22. July.

Sun

. Effect of an expander with overall liquid on efficiency of an air separation process. Cryogenic Technol 2004; 3: 17–19.

Zhao W, Sun J, Zhu H, et al. Numerical investigation of a cryogenic liquid turbine performance and flow behavior. In: ASME turbo expo, Berlin, Germany, 9–13 June 2008, ASME paper GT2008-50391.

10.

Song P, Sun J, Wang K, et al. Development of an optimization design method for turbomachinery by incorporating the cooperative coevolution genetic algorithm and adaptive approximate model. In: ASME turbo expo, Vancouver, British Columbia, 6–10 June 2011, ASME paper GT2011-45411.

11.

Brennen

. Hydrodynamics of pumps, Oxford, UK: Oxford Science Publications, 1994, pp. 81.

12.

Goel

Thakur

Haftka

. Surrogate model-based strategy for cryogenic cavitation model validation and sensitivity evaluation. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 2008; 58: 969–1007.

13.

Iliescu MS, Ciocan GD and Avellan F. 3D PIV and LDV measurements at the outlet of a Francis turbine draft tube. In: ASME 2002 Joint US-European fluids engineering division conference, 2002, pp.311–316. New York, NY: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

14.

Ciocan

Iliescu

. Experimental study and numerical simulation of the FLINDT draft tube rotating vortex. J Fluids Eng 2007; 129: 146–158.

15.

Ruprecht A, Helmrich T, Aschenbrenner T, et al. Simulation of vortex rope in a turbine draft tube. In: Proceedings of 22nd IAHR symposium on hydraulic machinery and systems, Lausanne, 9–12 September 2002.

16.

Paik

Sotiropoulos

Sale

. Numerical simulation of swirling flow in complex hydroturbine draft tube using unsteady statistical turbulence models. J Hydraul Eng 2005; 131: 441–456.

17.

Susan-Resiga

Muntean

Stein

. Axisymmetric swirling flow simulation of the draft tube vortex in Francis turbines at partial discharge. Int J Fluid Mach Syst 2009; 2: 295–302.

18.

Susan-Resiga

Ciocan

Anton

. Analysis of the swirling flow downstream a Francis turbine runner. J Fluids Eng 2006; 128: 177–189.

19.

Tridon

Barre

Ciocan

. Experimental analysis of the swirling flow in a Francis turbine draft tube: Focus on radial velocity component determination. Eur J Mech-B/Fluids 2010; 29: 321–335.

20.

Iliescu

Ciocan

Avellan

. Analysis of the cavitating draft tube vortex in a Francis turbine using particle image velocimetry measurements in two-phase flow. J Fluids Eng 2008; 130: 021105.

21.

Escaler

Egusquiza

Farhat

. Detection of cavitation in hydraulic turbines. Mech Syst Signal Process 2006; 20: 983–1007.

22.

Zhang H and Zhang L. Numerical simulation of cavitating turbulent flow in a high head Francis turbine at part load operation with OpenFOAM In: International conference on advances in computational modeling and simulation, 2012; 31: 156-165.

23.

Susan-Resiga R, Vu TC, Muntean S, et al. Jet control of the draft tube vortex rope in Francis turbines at partial discharge. In: Proceedings of the 23rd IAHR symposium on hydraulic machinery and systems, Yokohama, October 2006, pp.17–21.

24.

Hočevar

Širok

Blagojevič

. Prediction of cavitation vortex dynamics in the draft tube of a Francis turbine using radial basis neural networks. Neural Comput Appl 2005; 14: 229–234.

25.

Kumar

Saini

. Study of cavitation in hydro turbines—A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2010; 14: 374–383.

26.

Galván S, Reggio M and Guibault F. Inlet velocity profile optimization of the turbine 99 draft tube. In: ASME 2013 fluids engineering division summer meeting, 2013, pp.V01AT2A007-V01AT02A.

27.

Moore

Meng

. Thermodynamic effects of cavitation of an 80.6 helical inducer operated in hydrogen, Washington DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1970.

28.

Moore

Meng

. Effect of blade leading edge thickness on cavitation performance of 80.6 helical inducer in hydrogen, Washington DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1970.

29.

Ruprecht

Eisinger

Göde

. Innovative design environments for hydro turbine components. Bern, HYDRO 2000.

30.

Eisinger

Ruprecht

. Automatic shape optimization of hydro turbine components based on CFD. TASK Quart 2001; 6: 101–111.

31.

Marjavaara

Lundström

. Redesign of a sharp heel draft tube by a validated CFD-optimization. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 2006; 50: 911–924.

32.

Sergio

Carlos

Pacheco

. Optimization methodology assessment for the inlet velocity profile of a hydraulic turbine draft tube: Part II—performance evaluation of draft tube model. J Global Optim 2013; 55: 729–749.

33.

He Z, Ge Y, Sun J, et al. Numerical study of cavitating behavior in a cryogenic liquid turbine. In: ASME turbo expo 2012: Turbine technical conference and exposition, Copenhagen, Denmark, 11–15 June 2012, ASME paper GT2012-68774.

34.

Wang

Sun

Song

. Experimental study of cryogenic liquid turbine expander with close-loop liquefied nitrogen system. Cryogenics 2015; 67: 4–14.

35.

Li K, Sun J, Fu J, et al. Design and numerical flow analysis of a LNG power recovery turbine. In: ASME turbo expo 2013: Turbine technical conference and exposition, San Antonio, TX, USA, 3–7 June 2013, ASME paper GT2013-94900.

36.

Song

Sun

Wang

. Axial flow compressor blade optimization through flexible shape tuning by means of cooperative co-evolution algorithm and adaptive surrogate model. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy 2014; 228: 782–798.

37.

CFX 12.1 help manual. Canonsburg, PA: Ansys Inc.

38.

Galván S, Guibault F and Reggio M. Numerical validation of different CFD k-e turbulent models using FLUENT code. In: Proceedings of the third IAHR/ERCOFTAC workshop on draft tube flow, Porjus, Sweden, 2005.

39.

Galván

Reggio

Guibault

. Assessment study of k-ε turbulence models and near-wall modeling for steady state swirling flow analysis in draft tube using FLUENT. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 2011; 5: 459–478.

40.

Gerber

. A CFD model for devices operating under extensive cavitation conditions. In: ASME 2002, International mechanical engineering congress and exposition, New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2002, pp. 341–349.

41.

Chen

Heister

. A numerical treatment for attached cavitation. J Fluids Eng 1994; 116: 613–618.

42.

Bakir

Rey

Gerber

. Numerical and experimental investigations of the cavitating behavior of an inducer. Int J Rotat Mach 2004; 10: 15–25.

43.

Balje

. Turbomachines: A guide to design selection and theory, New York: John Wiley & Son Inc., 1981.

44.

Hord J. Cavitation in liquid cryogens, II—Hydrofoil. NASA CR-2156, 1973.

45.

Zhang

Mao

. Characteristics and control of the draft-tube flow in part-load Francis turbine. J Fluids Eng 2009; 131: 021101.

46.

Galván

Rubio

Pacheco

. Optimization methodology assessment for the inlet velocity profile of a hydraulic turbine draft tube: Part I—computer optimization techniques. J Global Optim 2013; 55: 53–72.