Aerodynamic performance of helical Savonius wind rotors with 30° and 45° twist angles: Experimental and numerical studies

Abstract

In this study, the aerodynamic performance of helical Savonius rotors with 30° and 45° twist angles have been investigated experimentally and numerically and compared with the conventional rotor with zero twist. This comparison has been performed at two Reynolds number of 1.50 × 10⁵ and 1.84 × 10⁵ (corresponding to wind velocities of 7.3 and 9 m/s) on Savonius type rotors with an aspect ratio of 1.0. Numerical simulations have been performed using the ANSYS-Fluent commercial software using the sliding-mesh method for considering the rotation of the turbine. The experimental measurements, however, are performed at an open-circuit wind tunnel facility. Results show that the maximum power coefficient of the helical rotors are less than the conventional rotor, in a manner that this coefficient decreases from 0.12 to 0.11, when the conventional rotor is replaced with the helical rotor having 45° twist angle. However, the helical rotors have a more uniform time variations of the torque coefficient. The maximum power coefficient for all the rotors has occurred at the tip speed ratio of 0.7. The good agreement observed between the numerical and experimental results revealed the suitability of the employed numerical scheme for predicting the aerodynamic performance of Savonius-type wind turbines.

Keywords

Helical Savonius twist angle vertical axis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hill

Dominy

Ingram

. Darrieus turbines: The physics of self-starting. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy 2009; 223: 21–29.

Fujisawa

. On the torque mechanism of Savonius rotors. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 1992; 40: 277–292.

Fujisawa

. Velocity measurements and numerical calculations of flow fields in and around Savonius rotors. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 1996; 59: 39–50.

Nakajima

Iio

Ikeda

. Performance of Savonius rotor for environmentally friendly hydraulic turbine. J Fluid Sci Technol 2008; 3: 420–429.

Alexander

Holownia

. Wind tunnel tests on a savonius rotor. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 1978; 3: 343–351.

Saha

Thotla

Maity

. Optimum design configuration of Savonius rotor through wind tunnel experiments. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 2008; 96: 1359–1375.

Kianifar

Anbarsooz

. Blade curve influences on the performance of Savonius rotors: Experimental and numerical. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy 2011; 225: 343–350.

Akwa

Vielmo

Petry

. A review on the performance of Savonius wind turbines. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2012; 16: 3054–3064.

Altan

Atılgan

. An experimental and numerical study on the improvement of the performance of Savonius wind rotor. Energy Convers Manage 2008; 49: 3425–3432.

10.

Altan

Atılgan

. The use of a curtain design to increase the performance level of a Savonius wind rotors. Renew Energy 2010; 35: 821–829.

11.

El-Askary

Nasef

AbdEl-hamid

. Harvesting wind energy for improving performance of Savonius rotor. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 2015; 139: 8–15.

12.

Irabu

Roy

. Characteristics of wind power on Savonius rotor using a guide-box tunnel. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2007; 32: 580–586.

13.

Tartuferi

D’Alessandro

Montelpare

. Enhancement of Savonius wind rotor aerodynamic performance: A computational study of new blade shapes and curtain systems. Energy 2015; 79: 371–384.

14.

Roy

Saha

. Wind tunnel experiments of a newly developed two-bladed Savonius-style wind turbine. Appl Energy 2015; 137: 117–125.

15.

Jeon

Jeong

Pan

J-K

. Effects of end plates with various shapes and sizes on helical Savonius wind turbines. Renew Energy 2015; 79: 167–176.

16.

Driss

Mlayeh

Driss

. Study of the bucket design effect on the turbulent flow around unconventional Savonius wind rotors. Energy 2015; 89: 708–729.

17.

Tang

Yao

Zhou

. A review on the new structure of Savonius wind turbines. Adv Mater Res 2013; 608–609: 467–478.

18.

Kamoji

Kedare

Prabhu

. Experimental investigations on single stage, two stage and three stage conventional Savonius rotor. Int J Energy Res 2008; 32: 877–895.

19.

Hayashi

Hara

. Wind tunnel tests on a different phase three-stage Savonius rotor. JSME Int J Ser B: Fluids Therm Eng 2005; 48: 9–16.

20.

Sheldahl

Feltz

Blackwell

. Wind tunnel performance data for two- and three-bucket Savonius rotors. J Energy 1978; 2: 160–164.

21.

Saha

Rajkumar

. On the performance analysis of Savonius rotor with twisted blades. Renew Energy 2006; 31: 1776–1788.

22.

Kamoji

Kedare

Prabhu

. Performance tests on helical Savonius rotors. Renew Energy 2009; 34: 521–529.

23.

Moffat

. Contributions to the theory of single-sample uncertainty analysis. J Fluids Eng 1982; 104: 250–258.

24.

Moffat

. Describing the uncertainties in experimental results. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 1998; 1: 3–17.

25.

Roy

Saha

. An adapted blockage factor correlation approach in wind tunnel experiments of a Savonius-style wind turbine. Energy Convers Manage 2014; 86: 418–427.

26.

Ross

Altman

. Wind tunnel blockage corrections: Review and application to Savonius vertical-axis wind turbines. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 2011; 99: 523–538.

27.

Chen

Liou

. Blockage corrections in wind tunnel tests of small horizontal-axis wind turbines. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2011; 35: 565–569.

28.

Barlow

Rae

Pope

. Low-speed wind tunnel testing, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1999.

29.

Pope

. Performance assessment of transient behaviour of small wind turbines, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Canada, 2009.

30.

ANSYS, Inc. ANSYS manual, Release 15.0.

31.

Nasef

El-Askary

AbdEl-hamid

. Evaluation of Savonius rotor performance: Static and dynamic studies. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 2013; 123: 1–11.