Combustion of a hydrogen jet normal to multiple pairs of opposing methane

Abstract

The combustion performance of a cylindrical burner accommodating up to six multiple pairs of opposing methane–air mixtures with a cross-flow of hydrogen was addressed. The cross-flow initially duplicated the stagnation impact and enriched the vortical structures. Aided by the resulting flow strain, the transport of heat and active species from the hydrogen oxidation zone to the methane reaction zones accelerated the combustion across the opposing premixed flames and reduced the peak temperature across the outer diffusion flame. Increasing the cross-flow/opposing jets’ velocity ratio to 0.89 merged the two stagnation centers and maximized the shearing stress. By the slight increase in the velocity ratio to 1.07, the H and OH pools provided for methane combustion became closer to the ports such that a hydrogen/methane mass percent of 10.3% extended the stoichiometric blowout velocity from 28.3 to 35.7 m/s. Since the turbulent kinetic energy thus increased to 8.4 m²/s², the firing intensity reached values as high as 48.2 MW/m³. Not only was there a reduction in the residence time for NOx formation, but also the blowout velocity relative gain overrode the relative increase in the NOx formation rates such that the NOx emission index decreased to 17 g/MWhr. By the excessive increase in velocity ratio, the vortical structures shrank such that the NOx exponential increase became dominant above 21 ppm. With fuel-lean mixtures, the hydrogen was partially combusted by the excess air from the opposing flames but the blowout velocity decreased to 13.1 m/s at Φ = 0.50. The hydrogen flame NOx emissions decreased by providing the excess air at larger jets’ diameter/separation ratios, thus reducing the residence times for thermal NOx formation and simultaneously interrupting the prompt NOx formation. At the lean operational limit, tripling the number of opposing jets decreased the hydrogen flame length by 54% such that the NOx emissions decreased by 38.4%.

Keywords

Combustion hydrogen methane opposing mixtures

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Zhang H, Lilik GK, Boehman AL, et al. Effects of hydrogen addition on NOx emissions in hydrogen-assisted diesel combustion. In: International multidimensional engine modeling users group meeting, Detroit, USA, 2009, pp.1–12.

Zaidi

Kasmani

Mustafa

. Numerical investigation on laminar burning velocity of hydrogen-methane/air mixtures: A review. J Eng Sci Technol 2015; 10: 40–49.

Sughayyer

. Effects of hydrogen addition on power and emissions outputs from Diesel engines. J Power Energy Eng 2016; 4: 47–56.

Marinov NM, Westbrook CK and Pitz WJ. Detailed and global chemical kinetics model for hydrogen. In: 8th International symposium on transport properties, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1995, pp.1–29.

Phillips JN and Roby RJ. .Enhanced gas turbine combustor performance using H₂-enriched natural gas. ASME Paper 99-GT-115, 1999, pp.141–53.

Westbrook

Dryer

. Chemical kinetic modeling of hydrocarbon combustion. Prog Energy Combust Sci 1984; 10: 1–57.

Schefer, RW. Combustion of hydrogen-enriched methane in a lean premixed swirl burner. In: Proceedings of the 2001 DOE hydrogen program review, NREL, 2001, pp.1–10.

Yamaoka

Tsuji

. An anomalous behavior of methane-air and methane-hydrogen-air flames diluted with nitrogen in a stagnation flow. Prog Energy Combust Sci 1992; 24: 145–152.

Wierzba

Ale

. Rich flammability limits of fuel mixtures involving hydrogen at elevated temperatures. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2000; 25: 75–80.

10.

Wang

Huang

Fang

. Combustion behaviors of a direct injection engine operating on various fractions of natural gas-hydrogen blends. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2007; 32: 3555–3564.

11.

Wang

Liu

. Experimental study on thermal efficiency and emission characteristics of a lean burn hydrogen enriched natural gas engine. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2007; 32: 5067–5075.

12.

Kamal

. Development of multiple opposing jets’ burner for premixed flames. J Power Energy 2012; 226: 1032–1049.

13.

Kamal

. Combustion via multiple pairs of opposing premixed flames with a cross-flow. Combust Sci Technol 2016.

14.

Mariani

Morrone

Unich

. A review of hydrogen-natural gas blend fuels in internal combustion engines, fossil fuel and the environment. InTech 2012; 28: 17–36.

15.

Ilbas

Crayford

Yilmaz

. Laminar burning velocities of hydrogen-air and hydrogen-methane-air mixtures: An experimental study. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2006; 31: 1768–1779.

16.

Mandilas

Ormsby

Sheppard

. Effects of hydrogen addition on laminar and turbulent premixed methane and iso-octane air flames. Proc Combust Inst 2007; 31: 1443–1450.

17.

Kim W-W and Menon S. Application of the localized dynamic subgrid-scale model to turbulent wall-bounded flows. In: 35th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, USA, 1997, pp.1–9.

18.

Williams

. NOx formation in two-stage methane-air flames. Combust Flame 1999; 118: 399–414.

19.

Bray

KNC

. Turbulent transport in flames. Math Phys Sci 1995; 451: 231–256.

20.

De Swart

Groot

Van Oijen

. Detailed analysis of the mass burning rate of stretched flames including preferential diffusion effects. Combust Flame 2006; 145: 245–258.

21.

Nagy

Shabtay

. Characteristics of jet impingement in a side-dump combustor. AIAA J 1986; 24: 1752–1757.

22.

Mathiew

Scott

. An introduction to turbulent flow, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 79–176.

23.

Mastorakos

Taylor

Whitelaw

. Extinction of turbulent counter-flow flames with reactants diluted by hot products. Combust Flame 1999; 102: 101–114.

24.

Kamal

. Development of a cylindrical burner comprising multiple pairs of opposing partially premixed or inverse diffusion flames. J Power Energy 2015; 229: 992–1006.

25.

Huang

Wang

. Characteristic flow modes of wake-stabilized jet flames in a transverse air stream. Combust Flame 1999; 117: 59–77.

26.

Ciani

Kreutner

Hubschmid

. Experimental investigation of the morphology and stability of diffusion and edge flames in an opposed jet burner. Combust Flame 2007; 150: 188–200.

27.

Katta

Meyer

Brown

. Extinction criterion for unsteady, opposing-jet diffusion flames. Combust Flame 2004; 137: 198–221.

28.

Yoshida

Narisawa

Tsuji

. Characteristics of mixture turbulence and structure of opposed jet burner flames. JSME Int J Ser B 1994; 37: 636–642.

29.

Yoshida

Naito

Mishra

. Turbulent combustion of preheated natural gas-air mixture. Fuel 2008; 87: 605–611.

30.

Gauducheau

Denet

Searby

. A numerical study of lean CH₄/H₂/air premixed flames at high pressure. Combust Sci Technol 1998; 137: 81–99.

31.

Peters

. Laminar flamelet concepts in turbulent combustion. Proc Combust Inst 1986; 21: 1231–1233.

32.

Iyogun

Birouk

. On the stability of a turbulent non-premixed methane flame. Combust Sci Technol 2009; 181: 1443–1463.

33.

Vejrazka J. Experimental study of a pulsating round impinging jet. PhD Thesis, Institute of Chemical Processes Fundamentals, France, 2002.

34.

Zhu

Takeno

Gore

. A study of the effects of chemical mechanism on the computed structure of a radiation sensitive opposed flow partially premixed flame. Combust Flame 2003; 135: 351–355.

35.

Sohn

Jeong

Chung

. Numerical study of the effects of pressure and air-dilution on NO formation in laminar counterflow diffusion flames of methane in high temperature air. Combust Flame 2002; 130: 83–93.

36.

Lee

Kim

. Numerical and experimental investigations of the NOx emission characteristics of CH₄-air coflow jet flames. Fuel 2004; 83: 2323–2334.

Combustion of a hydrogen jet normal to multiple pairs of opposing methane–air mixtures

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References