Effects of inducer tip clearance on the performance and flow characteristics of a pump in a turbopump

Abstract

A turbopump is used to pressurize propellants to gain high thrust in a projectile and consists of two pumps and a turbine. The pumps usually employ an inducer upstream to prevent performance deterioration by lowering net positive suction head required of the main impeller. However, several types of cavitation and instabilities take place in the flow field. Therefore, numerous experiments and CFD analysis for turbopumps have been conducted. Especially, there were some previous studies on inducer tip clearance, but they were limited to inducer regions due to the complexity of simulating the entire pump. In this study, the flow through an oxidizer pump in a turbopump was numerically investigated with four different sizes of inducer tip clearances. ANSYS CFX 13.0 with Rayleigh–Plesset equation was used to test flows in both non-cavitating and cavitating conditions. In the non-cavitating condition, the pump with the largest inducer tip clearance showed the worst head rise, efficiency and huge size of backflow arose near inducer casing. Also, the vortex was generated between the inducer blades in the case of large inducer tip clearance due to weak tip leakage flow. In the cavitating condition, the inducer with large tip clearance was found to be vulnerable to low suction pressure and floating cavity was observed between the inducer blades. However, the heads of the pumps with different inducer tip clearances were broken down at similar cavitation numbers due to the blade cavitation near the impeller throat. In addition, the transferred cavity from the inducer region also induced head breakdown of the pump.

Keywords

Cavitating flow impeller inducer tip clearance turbopump

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Coutier-Delgosha

Morel

Fortes-Patella

. Numerical simulation of turbopump inducer cavitating behavior. Int J Rotat Machine 2005; 2005: 135–142.

Yamanishi

Fukao

Qiao

. LES simulation of backflow vortex structure at the inlet of an inducer. J Fluid Eng 2006; 129: 587–594.

Lee

Yoo

Kang

. Experiments on cavitation instability of a two-bladed turbopump inducer. J Mech Sci Technol 2009; 23: 2350–2356.

Kang

Yonezawa

Horiguchi

. Cause of cavitation instabilities in three dimensional inducer. Int J Fluid Mach Syst 2009; 2: 206–214.

Mishra

Ghosh

. Predicting performance of axial pump inducer of LOX booster turbo-pump of staged combustion cycle based rocket engine using CFD. IOP Conference Series: Mater Sci Eng 2015; 101: 1–8.

Choi

Kim

. Numerical studies on the inducer/impeller interaction liquid rocket engine turbopump. KSFM J Fluid Mach 2003; 6: 50–57.

Lee

Kang

Lee

. Cavitation test of a high pressure turbopump. KSFM J Fluid Mach 2005; 7: 16–23.

Choi

Noh

Kim

. Performance prediction of a turbopump system. J Korean Soc Aeronaut Space Sci 2006; 34: 70–75.

Kim

Choi

Baek

. Characteristics of cavitating flow in turbopump inducer/impeller. KSFM J Fluid Mach 2014; 17: 21–28.

10.

Choi

Kim

. Effects of inducer tip clearance on the suction performance of a pump for turbopumps. KSFM J Fluid Mach 2012; 15: 41–45.

11.

Campos-Amezcua

Khelladi

Mazur-Czerwiec

. Numerical and experimental study of cavitating flow through an axial inducer considering tip clearance. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy 2013; 0957650913497357: 1–11.

12.

Kim

Choi

Kim

. Effects of tip clearance on performance and characteristics of backflow in a turbopump inducer. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy 2013; 227: 847–857.

13.

Kim

Choi

Kim

. Tip clearance effects on cavitation evolution and head breakdown in turbopump inducer. AIAA J Propul Power 2013; 29: 1357–1366.

14.

ANSYS CFX 13.0 User’s Guide.

15.

Franc JP. Physics and control of cavitation. In: Design and Analysis of High Speed Pumps, Educational Notes RTO-EN-AVT-143, Paper 2, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France: RTO, 2006, pp.2-1-2-36.

16.

Choi

Noh

Kim

. Effects of floating-ring seal clearance on the pump performance for turbopumps. AIAA J Propul Power 2009; 25: 191–195.

17.

Medvitz

Kunz

Boger

. Performance analysis of cavitating flow in centrifugal pumps using multiphase CFD. J Fluid Eng 2002; 124: 377–383.

18.

Brennen CE. Hydrodynamics of pumps. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2011, chap. 7.

19.

Kim C, Choi C, Kim S, et al. Numerical study on the effects of installing an inducer on a pump in a turbopump. (unpublished).

20.

Yamamoto

Tsujimoto

. A backflow vortex cavitation and its effects on cavitation instabilities. Int J Fluid Mach Syst 2009; 2: 40–54.

21.

Shimiya

Fujii

Horiguchi

. Suppression of cavitation instabilities in an inducer by J Groove. J Fluid Eng 2008; 130: 1–7.

22.

Enomoto N, Kim JH, Ishizaka K, et al. Suppression of cavitation surge of a helical inducer occurring in partial flow conditions. In: Proceedings of 5th international symposium on cavitation, Osaka, Japan, 1–4 November 2003, pp.1–8.