Effect of swirl on the performance and stability of transonic axial compressor

Abstract

To investigate the effect of twin swirl and bulk swirl on the performance and stability of a transonic axial compressor, a blade swirl generator was designed and simulated with a transonic single rotor using steady and unsteady numerical calculation methods. The bulk swirl intensity was adjusted by replacing the blades with different camber angles. The twin swirl intensity was decreased by reducing the blade number. The counter-rotating bulk swirl generated a significant drop in both the efficiency and stall margin, and resulted in an increase in the choked mass flow, and total pressure ratio. The co-rotating bulk swirl generated a decrease in the mass flow, total pressure ratio and stable operating range. The counter-rotating bulk swirl resulted in suction surface boundary layer separation beyond 50% of the span-wise height as well as more serious tip leakage blockage. The twin swirl resulted in a decrease in the total pressure ratio, maximum efficiency and stable operating range. The steady and unsteady numerical calculation results were consistent, though some differences were observed in the values. For the steady calculation, the maximum efficiency and choked mass flow decreased by 0.88% and 1.74%, respectively, and the mass flow at the stable boundary increased by 3.92% as compared to the uniform inlet flow at twin swirl intensity of 24°. During the unsteady calculation, the mass flow exhibited an increase of only 2.2% at the stable boundary. Under twin swirl and co-rotating bulk swirl and uniform inlet flow, the leading edge spillage of the tip leakage flow resulted in compressor instability. The counter-rotating bulk swirl changed the mechanism of instability. The characterisation of the swirl distortion presented a difference between the steady and unsteady calculations near the stable boundary. The unsteady calculation exhibited a lower mass flow at the stable boundary point and a higher total pressure ratio.

Keywords

Compressor transonic twin swirl bulk swirl efficiency stability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Genssler

Meyer

Fottner

. Development of intake swirl generators for turbo jet engine testing, engine response to distorted inflow conditions, Munich: AGARD, 1987, pp. 18.1–18.21.

Cousins WT, Miller R E, and Dalton K T. Distortion tolerance of the T800-LHT-800 turboshaft engine. In: Proceedings of the American helicopter society 47th annual forum, Alexandria, VA: American Helicopter Society. 2, 1991, No. A92-14326 03-01, pp.1147–1155.

Lotter KW and Jorg J. The effect of intake flow disturbances on APU compressor blade high cycle fatigue in the Airbus A300. In: Proceedings of the 13th congress of ICAS/AIAA. Seattle: ICAS28224. 6. 2, 1982.

Lecht M and Weyer HB. Unsteady rotor blade loading in an axial compressor with steady state inlet distortions [R]. AGARD CP248230, 1978.

Sheoran Y and Bouldin B. A versatile design of a controlled swirl distortion generator for testing gas turbine engines. In: ASME turbo expo 2008: turbine technical conference and exposition, Berlin, Germany, 9–13 June 2008, paper no. GT2008-50657.

Sheoran Y, Bouldin B and Krishnan PM. Advancements in the design of an adaptable swirl distortion generator for testing gas turbine engines. In: ASME turbo expo 2009: turbine technical conference and exposition, Orlando, Florida, USA, 8–12 June 2009, paper no. GT2009-59146.

Sheoran Y, Bouldin B and Krishnan PM. Compressor performance and operability in swirl distortion. In: ASME turbo expo 2010: turbine technical conference and exposition, Glasgow, UK, 14–18 June 2010, paper no. GT2010-22777.

Hoopes KM and O’Brien WF. The StreamVane method: a new way to generate swirl distortion for jet engine research. In: 49th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference, July 2013, No. AIAA 2013-3665. San Jose, California: AIAA.

Nelson MA, Lowe KT, O’Brien WF, et al. Stereoscopic PIV measurements of swirl distortion on a full-scale turbofan engine inlet. In: 52nd aerospace sciences meeting, January 2014, No. AIAA 2014-0533. National Harbor, Maryland: AIAA.

10.

Frohnapfel DJ, O’Brien WF and Lowe KT. Fan rotor flow measurements in a turbofan engine operating with inlet swirl distortion. In: 55th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, Grapevine, TX, USA, 9–13 Jan. 2017.

11.

Davis M, Beale D and Sheoran Y. Integrated test and evaluation techniques as applied to an inlet swirl investigation using the F109 gas turbine engine. In: ASME turbo expo 2008: turbine technical conference and exposition, Berlin, Germany, 9–13 June 2008, paper no. GT2008-50074.

12.

Guo

. Development of body force model for steady inlet distortions in high-speed multistage compressor. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2017; 231: 1650–1659.

13.

Sghaier TB, Mehdi A, Pachidis V, et al. A parametric numerical study of the effects of inlet swirl distortion on a transonic compressor stage. In: ASME turbo expo 2013: turbine technical conference and exposition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 3–7 June 2013, paper no. GT2013-94374.

14.

Pardo AC, Mehdi A, Pachidis V, et al. Numerical study of the effect of multiple tightly-wound vortices on a transonic fan stage performance. In: Proceedings of ASME turbo expo 2014: turbine technical conference and exposition, June 2014, No. GT2014-26481. Düsseldorf, Germany: ASME.

15.

Naseri

Boroomand

Sammak

. Numerical investigation of effect of inlet swirl and total-pressure distortion on performance and stability of an axial transonic compressor. J Thermal Sci 2016; 25: 510–510.

16.

Hou

Wang

. Effects of bending-torsional duct-induced swirl distortion on aerodynamic performance of a centrifugal compressor. J Thermal Sci 2017; 26: 97–106.

17.

Reid

Moore

. Design and overall performance of four highly-loaded, high-speed inlet stages for an advanced high-pressure-ratio core compressor. NASA. TP-1337, 1978.

18.

Peng

Yin

. Measurement of inlet swirl in flight. J Propuls Technol 1994; 15: 8–13.

19.

Chen

Zhou

Wang

et al.

Numerical investigation of boundary layer suction on certain highly loaded aspirated compressor at low speeds. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering. first published 2 Oct 2016.

20.

. Numerical simulation of low speed axial compressor with swirl distortion. J Propuls Technol 2016; 9: 1649–1656.