The engineering challenges of CO 2 storage

Abstract

The permanent underground storage of large quantities of anthropogenic carbon dioxide from thermal energy and industrial plant is widely recognised as a fundamental tool which can help to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. To achieve this effectiveness, it will require widespread global deployment in a new industry which would rival the current oil and gas industry in its scale and ambition. Many of the technologies for carbon dioxide storage are the adaptations of oil and gas technology, but there are some important differences. These arise from:

1. the thermodynamic properties of carbon dioxide,

2. the essential requirement for long-term storage site integrity,

3. the absence of an established and mature business model for the industry and

4. the contrasting regulatory environments between carbon capture and storage and oil and gas extraction.

Whilst the underground injection of carbon dioxide can truly be considered a proven technology, there are a range of engineering challenges to achieve this in a safe and cost effective manner. This paper sets out to explore some of these challenges and concludes with a view of what next steps are required to progress carbon dioxide storage effectively within the UK.

• The challenges of injecting carbon dioxide into offshore subsurface reservoirs:

^ Arrival processing (heating before injection)

^ Injectivity assessment – how many wells?

^ Platform or subsea?

^ Well design for long service operations and monitoring

• The challenges of forecasting reservoir and injection performance within porous and permeable storage reservoirs:

^ Issues influencing carbon dioxide storage capacity

^ Assuring storage site containment integrity

^ Geology and engineering – uncertainty and risk

• Where has the industry got to and what are the practical next steps?

Keywords

Carbon capture and sequestration carbon capture and storage carbon dioxide

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Oil & Gas Authority. Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) strategy, Aberdeen: Oil & Gas Authority, 2016.

Tollefson J. ‘Flaring’ wastes 3.5% of world's natural gas. Nature International Weekly Journal of Science, www.nature.com/news/flaring-wastes-3-5-of-world-s-natural-gas-1.19141 (2016, accessed 15 January 2018).

NIST. NIST Chemistry WebBook. National Institute of Standards and Technology, http://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?ID=C124389&Mask=4 (2017, accessed 15 January 2018).

Energy Technologies Institute. Progressing development of the UK's strategic carbon dioxide storage resource. Loughborough, UK: Pale Blue Dot Energy Ltd, 2016.

Pruess JE. Flow instabilities during injection of CO₂ into saline aquifers. In: Proceedings of TOUGH Symposium 2003, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA, 12–14 May 2003. Austin, TX, USA: Energy Procedia, Elsevier.

Maas DL. Thermal effects in a depleted gas field by cold CO₂ injection in the presence of methane. In: 12th international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies, GHGT-12, vol. 63, 2014, pp.3632–3647. Austin, TX, USA: Elsevier.

BAINES SJ. Geological storage of carbon dioxide, London: Geological Society, 2004, pp. 1–6.

ETI. CO₂ stored, www.co2stored.co.uk (accessed 15 January 2018).

Ji-Quan Shi CI. Snøhvit CO₂ storage project: assessment of CO₂ injection performance through history matching of the injection well pressure over a 32-months period. In: GHGT-11 proceedings of the 11th international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies, Kyoto, Japan, 18–22 November 2012. Kyoto: Elsevier.

10.

Pale Blue Dot Energy AW. D10: WP5A – Bunter Storage Development Plan – 10113ETIS-Rep-13-02. Loughborough, UK: Energy Technologies Institute, 2015.

11.

Society of Petroleum Engineers. Guidelines for application of the petroleum resources management system, www.spe.org/industry/docs/PRMS_Guidelines_Nov2011.pdf (2011, accessed 15 January 2018).

12.

Pale Blue Dot Energy AW. D12: WP5C – Hamilton Storage Development Plan – 10113ETIS-Rep-17-03. Loughborough, UK: Energy Technologies Institute, 2016.

13.

IEAGHG. Extraction of formation water from CO₂ storage, http://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/2012-12.pdf (2012, accessed 15 January 2018).

14.

Muller

Mackie

et al.

CO₂ injection impairment due to halite precipitation. Energy Procedia 2009; 1: 3507–3514.

15.

Benson

. The CO₂ capture and storage project (CCP) for carbon dioxide storage in deep geologic formations for climate change mitigation, vol. 2: geologic storage of carbon dioxide with monitoring and verification, London: Elsevier, 2004.