Numerical investigation of tip flow dynamics and main flow characteristics with varying tip clearance widths for an axial-flow pump

Abstract

The effects of varying tip clearance widths on tip flows dynamics and main flows characteristics for an axial-flow pump are studied employing computational fluid dynamics method. An analysis is presented for the distributions of turbulent kinetic energy, mean axial velocity, and mean vorticity magnitude at the specific flow rate of 0.7Q_BEP , focusing on flow patterns in the tip region with different tip clearance widths and associated flows. From the simulation results we find that the flow structure of tip vortex and its transportation strongly depend on the tip clearance width, especially for the extension of tip leakage vortex, appearance of induced vortex and the area of tip separation vortex. For a small clearance of 0.15 mm at 0.7Q_BEP, there is no tip separation vortex at the tip. When tip clearance width becomes larger, a tip separation vortex attaches more on the surface of blade tip as well as vortex intensity of tip flows increases. For tip clearances of 0.9 and 1.2 mm, there is a small part of induced vortex near the blade leading edge. Meanwhile, no induced vortex can be captured for tip clearances of 0.15 and 0.45 mm. The relative angle between the blade chord and tip leakage vortex trajectory reduces gradually when tip clearance width increases from 0.45 to 1.2 mm. Additionally, the radial position of tip leakage vortex core moves inwards as tip clearance width increases. Furthermore, a larger tip clearance width has greater effects on the main-stream characteristics especially near the shroud, which is due to more energy being exchanged between tip flows and main flows. At the flow rate 0.7Q_BEP, both the efficiency and head of the pump reduce with an increasing tip clearance because of greater energy loss.

Keywords

Axial-flow pump tip clearance width tip leakage vortex turbulent kinetic energy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hsiao

Chahine

. Scaling of tip vortex cavitation inception noise with a bubble dynamics model accounting for nuclei size distribution. J Fluids Eng 2005; 127: 55–65.

Feng

Luo

Guo

et al.

Influence of tip clearance on pressure fluctuations in an axial flow pump. J Mech Sci Technol 2016; 30: 1603–1610.

Tan

Miorini

et al.

Three-dimensional flow structures and associated turbulence in the tip region of a waterjet pump rotor blade. Exp Fluids 2011; 51: 1721–1737.

Dreyer

Decaix

Münch-Alligné

et al.

Mind the gap: a new insight into the tip leakage vortex using stereo-PIV. Exp Fluids 2014; 55: 1–13.

You

Wang

Moin

et al.

Large-eddy simulation analysis of mechanisms for viscous losses in a turbomachinery tip-clearance flow. J Fluid Mech 2007; 586: 177–204.

Decaix

Balarac

Dreyer

et al.

RANS and LES computations of the tip-leakage vortex for different gap widths. J Turbul 2015; 16: 309–341.

Furukawa M, Saiki K, Yamada K, Unsteady flow behavior due to breakdown of tip leakage vortex in an axial compressor rotor at near-stall condition. Volume 1: Aircraft engine; marine; turbomachinery. In: ASME turbo expo 2000: Power for land, sea, and air, 2000, 1–12.

Shi WD, Li TT, Zhang DS, Numerical simulation of tip clearance leakage vortex flow characteristic in axial flow pump. In: 26th IAHR symposium on hydraulic machinery and systems, Beijing, 19–23, August 2012.

Shi

Zhang

Zhao

et al.

Effect of blade tip geometry on tip leakage vortex dynamics and cavitation pattern in axial-flow pump. Sci China Technol Sci 2017; 60: 1480–1493.

10.

Shi L, Zhang DS, Zhao RJ, et al. Visualized observations of trajectory and dynamics of unsteady tip cloud cavitating vortices in axial flow pump. J Fluid Sci Technol 2017; 12(1): JFST0007.

11.

Shi

Zhang

Jin

et al.

A study on tip leakage vortex dynamics and cavitation in axial-flow pump. Fluid Dyn Res 2017; 49(3): 035504,.

12.

Zhang

Shi

WD (Bart)

van Esch

BPM

et al.

Numerical and experimental investigation of tip leakage vortex trajectory and dynamics in an axial flow pump. Comput Fluids 2015; 112: 61–71.

13.

Zhang

Shi

Pan

et al.

Numerical and experimental investigation of tip leakage vortex cavitation patterns and mechanisms in an axial flow pump. J Fluids Eng 2015; 137(12): 121103–121114.

14.

Liu

Tan

Hao

et al.

Energy performance and flow patterns of a mixed-flow pump with different tip clearance sizes. Energies 2017; 10(2): 191.

15.

Feng WM, Pan JY, Guo ZW, et al. The effects of variable-inlet guide vanes on performance of an axial flow pump with tip clearance. In: ASME/JSME/KSME 2015 joint fluids engineering conference, Seoul, South Korea, 26–31 July 2015.

16.

Mao

Liu

. Numerical investigation of tip clearance size effect on the performance and tip leakage flow in a dual-stage counter-rotating axial compressor. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2017; 231: 474–484.

17.

Gao

et al.

Numerical investigations of tip clearance flow characteristics of a pumpjet propulsor. Int J Naval Archit Ocean Eng 2017; 10: 307–317.

18.

Cheng

Long

Liang

et al.

URANS simulations of the tip-leakage cavitating flow with verification and validation procedures. J Hydrodyn 2018; 30: 531–534.

19.

Long

Cheng

et al.

Large eddy simulation and Euler–Lagrangian coupling investigation of the transient cavitating turbulent flow around a twisted hydrofoil. Int J Multiphase Flow 2018; 100: 41–56.

20.

Qian

Wang

Guo

et al.

Performance evaluation of an axial-flow pump with adjustable guide vanes in turbine mode. Renew Energy 2016; 99: 1146–1152.

21.

Menter

. Review of the shear-stress transport turbulence model experience from an industrial perspective. Int J Comput Fluid Dyn 2009; 23: 305–316.

22.

Bardina JE, Huang PG and Coakley TJ. Turbulence modeling validation, testing, and development. NASA Technical Report Memorandum No. 110446, 1997.