The correct prediction of the flow field is of crucial importance to drive numerical optimization to a real improvement of a design. For this purpose, different numerical approaches can be used to study the fluid dynamics characteristics and the performance of the design. In particular, in the present work the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes and large eddy simulation approach are compared for an internal aerodynamic application. The obtained solutions are validated against experiments through a quantitative and qualitative comparison, i.e. pressure measurements and particle image velocimetry flow visualizations, respectively.
VerstraeteTColettiFVanderwielenT, et al.Optimization of a u-bend for minimal pressure loss in internal cooling channels-part I: numerical method. J Turbomach2013; 135: 051015.
2.
ColettiFVerstraeteTVanderwielenT, et al.Optimization of a u-bend for minimal pressure loss in internal cooling channels-part II: experimental validation. J Turbomach2013; 135: 051016.
3.
HanJDuttaSEkkadS. Gas turbine heat transfer and cooling technology, Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis, 2000.
4.
HumphreyJWhitelawJYeeG. Turbulent flow in a square duct with strong curvature. J Fluid Mech1981; 103: 443–463.
5.
ChangSHumphreyJModaviA. Turbulent flow in a strongly curved u-bend and downstream tangent of square cross-sections. Physico-Chem Hydrodyn1983; 4: 243–269.
6.
Monson D, Seegmiller H, Jackson D, et al. An experimental investigation of subsonic flow in a two dimensional u-duct. NASA Report TM-103931, 1992.
7.
Schabacker J, Boelcs A and Johnson B. PIV investigation of the flow characteristics in an internal coolant passage with two ducts connected by a sharp 180° bend. ASME Paper 98-GT-544, 1998.
8.
LiouTChenC. LDV study of developing flow through a smooth duct with a 180° straight-corner turn. J Turbomach1999; 121: 167–174.
9.
YuRPuJWangP, et al.Auxiliary hole influence on internal flow characteristics in bend region of a real investment-casting blade coolant channel. Exp Therm Fluid Sci2019; 102: 123–136.
10.
LuoLZhaoZKanX, et al.On the heat transfer and flow structures characteristics of turbine blade tip underside with dirt purge holes at different locations by using topological analysis. J Turbomach2019; 141: 1–24.
11.
UllalAHungSHuangS, et al.Experimental investigation of the effect of compound protrusion-pin array on heat transfer in an internal rotating cooling channel. Appl Therm Eng2018; 140: 23–33.
12.
DuWLuoLWangS, et al.Flow structure and heat transfer characteristics in a 90° turned pin fined duct with different dimple/protrusion depths. Appl Therm Eng2019; 146: 826–842.
13.
SinghAPrasadB. Influence of novel equilaterally staggered jet impingement over a concave surface at fixed pumping power. Appl Therm Eng2019; 148: 609–619.
14.
SinghPZhangMAhmedS, et al.Effect of micro-roughness shapes on jet impingement heat transfer and fin-effectiveness. Int J Heat Mass Transfer2019; 132: 80–95.
15.
Namgoong H, Son C and Ireland P. U-bend shaped turbine blade cooling passage optimization. In: 12th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, Victoria, Canada, 10–12 September 2008, Vol. 3, 2008, pp.1439–1447.
16.
ZehnerSSteinbruckHNeumannS, et al.The ice formation method: a natural approach to optimize turbomachinery components. Int J Des Nature2009; 3: 259–272.
17.
VerstraeteTMüllerLMüllerJ. Adjoint-based design optimisation of an internal cooling channel u-bend for minimised pressure losses. Int J Turbomach Propul Power2017; 2: 10.
18.
Verstraete T and Li J. Multi-objective optimization of a u-bend for minimal pressure loss and maximal heat transfer performance in internal cooling channels. In: ASME turbo expo 2013: turbine technical conference and exposition: Volume 3A: heat transfer, San Antonio, TX, USA, 3–7 June 2013.
19.
LuoLDuWWangS, et al.Multi-objective optimization of the dimple/protrusion channel with pin fins for heat transfer enhancement. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow2019; 29: 790–813.
20.
Elsayed K, Miranda J and Lacor C. Minimization of the pressure loss in internal cooling channels using the adjoint method. In: 1st aviation engineering innovations conference paper, Luxor, Egypt, 21–22 March 2015, AEIC-2015-000.
21.
Alessi G, Koloszar L, Verstraete T, et al. Node-based adjoint surface optimization of u-bend duct for pressure loss reduction. In: Andrés-Pérez et al. (ed.) Evolutionary and deterministic methods for design optimization and control with applications to industrial and societal problems computational methods in applied sciences. New York: Springer, 2018, pp.61–75.
22.
Lucci J, Amano R and Guntur k. Turbulent flow and heat transfer in variable geometry u-bend blade cooling passage. ASME Paper GT2007-27120, 2007.
23.
SchülerMNeumannSWeigandB. Numerical investigations of pressure loss and heat transfer in a 180° bend of a ribbed two-pass internal cooling channel with engine-similar cross-sections. J Power Energy2010; 224: 349–361.
24.
IacovidesHLaunderB. Computational fluid dynamics applied to internal gas-turbine blade cooling: a review. Int J Heat Fluid Flow1996; 16: 454–470.
LaunderBSharmaB. Application of the energy-dissipation model of turbulence to the calculation of flow near a spinning disc. Lett Heat Mass Transfer1974; 1: 131–137.
27.
NicoudFDucrosF. Subgrid-scale stress modelling based on the square of the velocity gradient tensor. Flow Turbul Combust1999; 62: 183–200.
28.
SorannaFChowYCUzolO, et al.The effect of inlet guide vanes impingement on the flow structure and turbulence around a rotor blade. J Turbomach2006; 128: 82–95.
29.
BradshawP. Effects of streamline curvature on turbulent flows. AGARDograph1973, pp. 169.
30.
DeanWHurstJ. Note on the motion of fluid in a curved pipe. Mathematika1959; 6: 77–85.
