Effect of porosity gradient in cathode gas diffusion layer of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells on the liquid water transport using lattice Boltzmann method
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2021
Effect of porosity gradient in cathode gas diffusion layer of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells on the liquid water transport using lattice Boltzmann method
In this paper, a two-dimensional model has been developed to simulate the liquid water transport in a cathode gas diffusion layer with different porosity gradients in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). Due to the complexity of porous media, the simulation was carried out by lattice Boltzmann method. According to dimensionless numbers that characterize liquid water transport in porous media, simulation conditions were similar to the liquid water transfer into the gas diffusion layer of PEMFC. Different gas diffusion layers were created randomly by solid circular particles with an average diameter of and the numerical code was validated by conducting several tests. The results indicated that capillary force is the main factor in liquid water transport in the gas diffusion layer, while viscous and gravitational forces do not have a significant effect. In addition to improve the water management, the gas diffusion layer should have a positive porosity gradient, i.e. the porosity increases along the thickness. Also, under the same boundary conditions and at the average porosity (0.659), the saturation distribution curves in three porous media were compared including the gas diffusion layer with porosity gradient, the gas diffusion layer with the micro-porous layer, and the gas diffusion layer with uniform porosity. The average liquid water saturation in the gas diffusion layer with the 10% porosity gradient was 20.2% lower than in the gas diffusion layer with uniform porosity and 10.5% lower than the gas diffusion layer + micro-porous layer. Furthermore, upon elevation of the porosity gradient in the gas diffusion layer, the average liquid water saturation in the gas diffusion layer decreased. Specifically, as the porosity gradient rose from 10% to 14% and 18.5%, the average liquid water saturation values decreased to 29.8% and 38.8%, respectively compared with the gas diffusion layer with uniform porosity.
TanerT. A flow channel with nafion membrane material design of pem fuel cell. J Therm Eng2019; 5: 456–468.
2.
TanerT. Alternative energy of the future: a technical note of PEM fuel cell water management. J Fundam Renew Energy Appl2015; 5: 1–4.
3.
TanerTNaqviSAHOzkaymakM. Techno‐economic analysis of a more efficient hydrogen generation system prototype: a case study of PEM electrolyzer with Cr‐C coated SS304 bipolar plates. Fuel Cells2019; 19: 19–26.
4.
TanerT. Energy and exergy analyze of PEM fuel cell: a case study of modeling and simulations. Energy2018; 143: 284–294.
5.
BerningTDjilaliN. A 3D, multiphase, multicomponent model of the cathode and anode of a PEM fuel cell. J Electrochem Soc2003; 150: A1589–A1598.
6.
ChenLLuanH-BHeY-L, et al.Numerical investigation of liquid water transport and distribution in porous gas diffusion layer of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell using lattice Boltzmann method. Russ J Electrochem2012; 48: 712–726.
7.
ChenLLuanH-BTaoW-Q. Liquid water dynamic behaviors in the GDL and GC of PEMFCs using lattice Boltzmann method. Front Heat Mass Transf2010, pp. 1–1.
8.
LuoGJuHWangC-Y. Prediction of dry-wet-dry transition in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc2007; 154: B316–B321.
9.
BarclayF. Fundamental thermodynamics of fuel cell, engine, and combined heat and power system efficiencies. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power Energy2002; 216: 407–417.
10.
ShenJXuLChangH, et al.Partial flooding and its effect on the performance of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Energy Convers Manage2020; 207: 112537–112537.
11.
SongDWangQLiuZ-S, et al.Transient analysis for the cathode gas diffusion layer of PEM fuel cells. J Power Sources2006; 159: 928–942.
12.
ZhanZXiaoJLiD, et al.Effects of porosity distribution variation on the liquid water flux through gas diffusion layers of PEM fuel cells. J Power Sources2006; 160: 1041–1048.
13.
Al-BaghdadiMSAl-JanabiHS. Numerical analysis of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Part 2: parametric study. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy2007; 221: 931–939.
14.
NamJHLeeK-JHwangG-S, et al.Microporous layer for water morphology control in PEMFC. Int J Heat Mass Transf2009; 52: 2779–2791.
15.
GerteisenDHeilmannTZieglerC. Enhancing liquid water transport by laser perforation of a GDL in a PEM fuel cell. J Power Sources2008; 177: 348–354.
16.
NaingKSSTabeYChikahisaT. Performance and liquid water distribution in PEFCs with different anisotropic fiber directions of the GDL. J Power Sources2011; 196: 2584–2594.
17.
GurauVBarbirFLiuH. An analytical solution of a half‐cell Model for PEM fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc2000; 147: 2468–2477.
18.
ShiZWangXDraperO. Effect of porosity distribution of gas diffusion layer on performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. ECS Trans2007; 11: 637–646.
19.
RoshandelRFarhaniehBSaievar-IranizadE. The effects of porosity distribution variation on PEM fuel cell performance. Renew Energy2005; 30: 1557–1572.
20.
HuangY-XChengC-HWangX-D, et al.Effects of porosity gradient in gas diffusion layers on performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Energy2010; 35: 4786–4794.
21.
Lee C-I, Jung S-P, Hsueh K-L, et al. Effect of porosity gradient in gas diffusion layer on cell performance with thin-film agglomerate model in cathode catalyst layer of a PEM fuel cell. In: ASME 2011 9th International Conference on Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology collocated with ASME 2011 5th International Conference on Energy Sustainability, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, 2012, pp.895–901.
22.
TsengC-JLoS-K. Effects of microstructure characteristics of gas diffusion layer and microporous layer on the performance of PEMFC. Energy Convers Manage2010; 51: 677–684.
23.
ParkJMatsubaraMLiX. Application of lattice Boltzmann method to a micro-scale flow simulation in the porous electrode of a PEM fuel cell. J Power Sources2007; 173: 404–414.
24.
ChenFChangM-HHsiehP-T. Two-phase transport in the cathode gas diffusion layer of PEM fuel cell with a gradient in porosity. Int J Hydrogen Energy2008; 33: 2525–2529.
25.
KartouzianDMohseniniaAMarkötterH, et al.Impact of porosity gradients within catalyst layer and MPL of a PEM fuel cell on the water management and performance: a neutron radiography investigation. ECS Trans2019; 92: 135–135.
26.
HaoLChengP. Lattice Boltzmann simulations of water transport in gas diffusion layer of a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. J Power Sources2010; 195: 3870–3881.
27.
KimKNKangJHLeeSG, et al.Lattice Boltzmann simulation of liquid water transport in microporous and gas diffusion layers of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. J Power Sources2015; 278: 703–717.
28.
MolaeimaneshGAkbariM. Impact of PTFE distribution on the removal of liquid water from a PEMFC electrode by lattice Boltzmann method. Int J Hydrogen Energy2014; 39: 8401–8409.
29.
ShakerinejadEKayhaniMNazariM, et al.Increasing the performance of gas diffusion layer by insertion of small hydrophilic layer in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy2018; 43: 2410–2428.
30.
ZhangDCaiQGuS. Three-dimensional lattice-Boltzmann model for liquid water transport and oxygen diffusion in cathode of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell with electrochemical reaction. Electrochim Acta2018; 262: 282–296.
31.
ShanXChenH. Lattice Boltzmann model for simulating flows with multiple phases and components. Phys Rev E1993; 47: 1815–1815.
32.
SalahYBTabeYChikahisaT. Two phase flow simulation in a channel of a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell using the lattice Boltzmann method. J Power Sources2012; 199: 85–93.
33.
HuangHSukopMLuX. Multiphase lattice Boltzmann methods: theory and application, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
34.
WeißJ-P. Numerical analysis of lattice Boltzmann methods for the heat equation on a bounded interval, Germany: KIT Scientific Publishing, 2006.
35.
ChenLKangQMuY, et al.A critical review of the pseudopotential multiphase lattice Boltzmann model: methods and applications. Int J Heat Mass Transfer2014; 76: 210–236.
36.
PorterMLCoonEKangQ, et al.Multicomponent interparticle-potential lattice Boltzmann model for fluids with large viscosity ratios. Phys Rev E2012; 86: 036701–036701.
37.
ZouQHeX. On pressure and velocity boundary conditions for the lattice Boltzmann BGK model. Phys Fluids1997; 9: 1591–1598.
38.
MukherjeePPWangC-YKangQ. Mesoscopic modeling of two-phase behavior and flooding phenomena in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Electrochim Acta2009; 54: 6861–6875.
39.
KavianyM. Principles of heat transfer in porous media, New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
40.
FeserJPrasadAAdvaniSG. Experimental characterization of in-plane permeability of gas diffusion layers. J Power Sources2006; 162: 1226–1231.
41.
HossainMIslamSZPollardP. Numerical study of the effect of effective diffusivity and permeability of the gas diffusion layer on fuel cell performance. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy2012; 226: 907–921.
42.
MauranSRigaudLCoudevylleO. Application of the Carman–Kozeny correlation to a high‐porosity and anisotropic consolidated medium: the compressed expanded natural graphite. Transp Porous Media2001; 43: 355–376.
43.
SukopMCThorneDT. Lattice Boltzmann modeling, New York: Springer, 2006.
44.
GhassemiAPakA. Numerical study of factors influencing relative permeabilities of two immiscible fluids flowing through porous media using lattice Boltzmann method. J Petrol Sci Eng2011; 77: 135–145.
45.
YiotisAGPsihogiosJKainourgiakisME, et al.A lattice Boltzmann study of viscous coupling effects in immiscible two-phase flow in porous media. Colloids Surf A2007; 300: 35–49.
46.
LiHPanCMillerCT. Pore-scale investigation of viscous coupling effects for two-phase flow in porous media. Phys Rev E2005; 72: 026705–026705.
47.
ChenLFengY-LSongC-X, et al.Multi-scale modeling of proton exchange membrane fuel cell by coupling finite volume method and lattice Boltzmann method. Int J Heat Mass Transfer2013; 63: 268–283.
48.
KhanMASundénBYuanJ. Analysis of multi-phase transport phenomena with catalyst reactions in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells – a review. J Power Sources2011; 196: 7899–7916.
