Computational investigation of the cavitation vortex dynamics in flow over a three-dimensional hydrofoil by a new transport-based model

Abstract

Cavitation is of significant practical interest due to its unsteady features which could induce destructive effects such as drastic drop in efficiency, noise, vibration, and corrosion for propulsion systems, rudders and other hydraulic machinery. A thorough understanding of the hydrodynamics in the cavitating flow past a three-dimensional hydrofoil makes indicators for an improved control performance of these hydraulic systems. Hence, a computational investigation of the cavitating flow over the Delft Twist-11 hydrofoil was performed with special emphasis on the cavitation vortex dynamics. A new transport-based cavitation model was proposed and compared with the conventional Schnerr–Sauer model through the predictions of cavitation characteristics, for which available experimental data were also provided. The results show that, as compared with the Schnerr–Sauer model, the proposed model can predict closer engineering parameters, including time-mean lift coefficient and vapor shedding frequency with the experiments. In addition, more reasonable structure and dynamics of the three-dimensional unsteady sheet/cloud cavitation patterns, including the cavity growth, break-off, and collapse downstream are captured by the proposed model. With the help of the vorticity transport equation in a variable density flow, further analysis of the flow field predicted by the proposed model reveals that cavitation promotes the production of vortex as well as the flow instabilities. Vorticity production in the cavitating flow is mainly induced by the terms of vortex stretching and vortex dilatation, while the baroclinic torque only contributes in the region of shedding and collapse of the cloud cavity and the contribution of the viscous diffusion term is negligible as compared with the other three terms. The main significance of this study is that it demonstrates the potential of a robust transport-based cavitation model to investigate the unsteady dynamics in the cavitating flow past a three-dimensional twisted hydrofoil and expected to make sense for other hydraulic machinery.

Keywords

Cavitation hydrofoil transport-based model vortex dynamics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wang

Zheng

. Research status and development of the bowed-twisted blade for turbomachines. Eng Sci 2000; 2: 40–48. in Chinese).

Zheng

. The internal flows of axial flow fans with skewed-swept in leading-edge. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol (Nature Science Edition) 2003; 31: 79–81. in Chinese).

Zhang

Feng

. A numerical analysis of the impact of solidity on bowed and swept cascade flow fields in a transonic compressor cascade. J Eng Therm Energy Power 2007; 22: 237–240. in Chinese).

Tao

Xiao

Wang

. Detached eddy simulations for high speed axial flow fuel pumps with swept and straight blade impellers. Eng Comput 2016; 33: 2530–2545.

Liu

Xiao

, et al. Effect of swept blade on hump and cavitation characteristics of axial flow pump. J Drain Irrig Mach Eng 2012; 30: 270–273. in Chinese).

Jiang

Zhu

, et al. Entropy generation analysis for the cavitating head-drop characteristic of a centrifugal pump. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science 2018; 232: 4637–4646.

Brennen

. Cavitation and bubble dynamics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

Schnerr

Sezal

Schmidt

. Numerical investigation of three-dimensional cloud cavitation with special emphasis on collapse induced shock dynamics. Phys Fluids 2008; 20: 040703–040703.

Arndt

REA

. Cavitation in vortical flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2002; 34: 143–175.

10.

Arabnejad

Amini

Farhat

, et al. Numerical and experimental investigation of shedding mechanisms from leading-edge cavitation. Int J Multiph Flow 2019; 119: 123–143.

11.

Movahedian

Pasandidehfard

Roohi

, et al. LES investigation of sheet-cloud cavitation around a 3-D twisted wing with a NACA 16012 hydrofoil. Ocean Eng 2019; 192: 106547.

12.

Luo

Arndt

REA

, et al. Numerical simulation of three dimensional cavitation shedding dynamics with special emphasis on cavitation–vortex interaction. Ocean Eng 2014; 87: 64–77.

13.

Wang

Huang

, et al. Numerical investigation of cavitation vortex dynamics in unsteady cavitating flow with shock wave propagation. Ocean Eng 2018; 156: 424–434.

14.

Wang

Cheng

, et al. Numerical investigation of unsteady cloud cavitating flow around the Clark-Y hydrofoil with adaptive mesh refinement using OpenFOAM. Ocean Eng 2020; 206: 107349–107349.

15.

Bonometti

Magnaudet

. An interface-capturing method for incompressible two-phase flows. Validation and application to bubble dynamics. Int J Multiph Flow 2007; 33: 109–133.

16.

Hong

Yuan

Zhou

, et al. Modeling of unsteady structure of sheet/cloud cavitation around a two-dimensional stationary hydrofoil. Proc IMechE, Part E: J Process Mechanical Engineering 2017; 231: 455–469.

17.

Delannoy Y. Two phase flow approach in unsteady cavitation modelling. Proceedings of cavitation and multiphase flow forum, ASME Fluids Engineering Division 1990; 98: 153–158.

18.

Coutier-Delgosha

Reboud

, et al. Numerical simulation of the unsteady behaviour of cavitating flows. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 2003; 42: 527–548.

19.

Wang

Ostoja-Starzewski

. Large eddy simulation of a sheet/cloud cavitation on a NACA0015 hydrofoil. Appl Math Model 2007; 31: 417–447.

20.

Gopalan

Katz

. Flow structure and modeling issues in the closure region of attached cavitation. Phys Fluids 2000; 12: 895–911.

21.

Kubota

Kato

Yamaguchi

. A new modelling of cavitating flows: a numerical study of unsteady cavitation on a hydrofoil section. J Fluid Mech 1992; 240: 59–96.

22.

Singhal

Athavale

, et al. Mathematical basis and validation of the full cavitation model. J Fluids Eng 2002; 124: 617–624.

23.

Schnerr GH and Sauer J. Physical and numerical modeling of unsteady cavitation dynamics. In: Proceedings of 4th international conference on multiphase flow, ICMF New Orleans, USA, 2001.

24.

Yuan

Schnerr

. Numerical simulation of two-phase flow in injection nozzles: interaction of cavitation and external jet formation. J Fluids Eng 2003; 125: 963–969.

25.

Zwart PJ, Gerber AG and Belamri T. A two-phase flow model for predicting cavitation dynamics. In: Proceedings of 5th international conference on multiphase flow, ICMF, Yokohama, Japan, 2004.

26.

Kunz

Boger

Stinebring

, et al. A preconditioned Navier–Stokes method for two-phase flows with application to cavitation prediction. Comput Fluids 2000; 29: 849–875.

27.

Launder

Spalding

. Lectures in mathematical models of turbulence, London: Academic Press, 1972.

28.

Zhang

Appiah

Hong

, et al. Energy loss evaluation in a side channel pump under different wrapping angles using entropy production method. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 2020; 113: 104526–104526.

29.

Dular

Bachert

Stoffel

, et al. Experimental evaluation of numerical simulation of cavitating flow around hydrofoil. Eur J Mech B Fluids 2005; 24: 522–538.

30.

Huang

Young

Wang

, et al. Combined experimental and computational investigation of unsteady structure of sheet/cloud cavitation. J Fluids Eng 2013, pp. 135–135. 071301.

31.

Girimaji

. Partially-averaged Navier-Stokes model for turbulence: a Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes to direct numerical simulation bridging method. J Appl Mech 2006; 73: 413–421.

32.

Shur

Spalart

Strelets

, et al. Detached-eddy simulation of an airfoil at high angle of attack. Engineering turbulence modelling and experiments, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Ltd, 1999.

33.

Spalart

Deck

Shur

, et al. A new version of detached-eddy simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn 2006; 20: 181–181.

34.

Wang

Zhang

Yuan

, et al. Effect of unrans and hybrid rans-les turbulence models on unsteady turbulent flows inside a side channel pump. ASME J Fluids Eng 2020; 142: 061503–061503.

35.

Sezal IH. Compressible dynamic of cavitating 3D multiphase flows. PhD Thesis, Technische Universität München, Germany, 2009.

36.

Shen

, et al. Extended compressible thermal cavitation model for the numerical simulation of cryogenic cavitating flow. Int J Hydrog Energy 2020; 45: 10104–10118.

37.

. Modeling of hydrodynamic cavitating flows considering the bubble-bubble interaction. Int J Multiph Flow 2016; 84: 155–164.

38.

Zhu

Lai

, et al. Application of the semi-analytical cavitation model to flows in a centrifugal pump. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 2017; 86: 92–100.

39.

Hong

Yuan

Zhou

. Application of a new cavitation model for computations of unsteady turbulent cavitating flows around a hydrofoil. J Mech Sci Technol 2017; 31: 249–260.

40.

Hong

Zhang

. Numerical investigation of turbulent cavitating flow in an axial flow pump using a new transport-based model. J Mech Sci Technol 2020; 34: 745–756.

41.

Smirnov

Menter

. Sensitization of the SST turbulence model to rotation and curvature by applying the Spalart–Shur correction term. J Turbomach 2009; 131: 041010–041010.

42.

Huang

Wang

Zhao

, et al. Physical and numerical investigation on transient cavitating flows. Sci China Technol Sci 2013; 56: 2207–2218.

43.

Foeth EJ. The structure of three-dimensional sheet cavitation. PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands, 2008.

44.

Grekula

Lindell

. Towards numerical prediction of unsteady sheet cavitation on hydrofoils. J Hydrodyn 2010; 22: 699–704.

45.

Bensow RE. Simulation of the unsteady cavitation on the Delft Twist11 foil using RANS, DES and LES. In: Second international symposium on marine propulsors Workshop proceedings, Hamburg, Germany, 2011.

46.

Roohi

Zahiri

Passandideh-Fard

. Numerical simulation of cavitation around a two-dimensional hydrofoil using VOF method and LES turbulence model. Appl Math Model 2013; 37: 6469–6488.

47.

Laberteaux

Ceccio

. Partial cavity flows, Part 1: cavities forming on models without spanwise variation. J Fluid Mech 2001; 431: 1–41.