The shape of impeller blades of a centrifugal pump affects the best efficiency point (BEP), and splitter blades improve the pump performance at BEP. In this work, multiple parameters such as number of blades, length of splitter blade, splitter blade angle at hub, and wrap angle were modified to maximize head and minimize input power. The problem was solved by a numerical and experimental approach. Initially, an impeller was designed and tested in a laboratory setup. The same impeller was simulated in a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solver, checked the accuracy of the CFD results, optimized by an in-house surrogate-based optimization code and finally the optimal designed manufactured and tested again. The mix and match of the splitter blade with the other parameters improved the pump performance i.e. head by 8.2% and overall efficiency by 3%. The improvement was due to the reduction in pressure fluctuations and uniform blade loading throughout the impeller blade span.
SiddiqueMHAfzalASamadA. Design optimization of the centrifugal pumps via low fidelity models, 2018; 1–14.
2.
LiuHChenXWangK, et al. Multi-condition optimization and experimental study of impeller blades in a mixed-flow pump. Adv Mech Eng2016; 8(6): 1–9. 168781401665181.
3.
DingHLiZGongX, et al. The influence of blade outlet angle on the performance of centrifugal pump with high specific speed. Vacuum2019; 159: 239–246.
4.
GolcuMUstaNPancarY.Effects of splitter blades on deep well pump performance. J. Energy Resour Technol2007; 129: 169–176.
5.
Djerroud M, NgomaDGhieGW.Numerical identification of key design parameters enhancing the centrifugal pump performance: impeller, impeller-volute, and impeller-diffuser. ISRN Mech Eng2011; 1–16.
6.
LiuH.Effects of blade number on characteristics of centrifugal pumps. Chin J Mech Eng2010; 23: 742.
7.
MiyamotoHNakashimaYOhbaH.Effects of splitter blades on the flows and characteristics in centrifugal impellers. JSME Int J1992; 35: 238–246.
8.
CavazziniGPavesiGSantolinA, et al. Using splitter blades to improve suction performance of centrifugal impeller pumps. Proc IMechE. Part A: J Power Energy2015; 229: 309–323.
9.
GolcuMPancarYSekmenY.Energy saving in a deep well pump with splitter blade. Energy Convers Manag2006; 47: 638–651.
10.
NamazizadehMGevariMTMojaddamM, et al. Optimization of the splitter blade configuration and geometry of a centrifugal pump impeller using design of experiment optimization of the splitter blade configuration and geometry of a centrifugal pump impeller using design of experiment. J Appl Fluid Mech2020; 13: 89–101.
11.
BellarySAISamadA.An alternative approach to surrogate averaging for a centrifugal impeller shape optimisation. Int J Comput Aided Eng Technol2017; 9: 62.
12.
HanXKangYShengJ, et al. Centrifugal pump impeller and volute shape optimization via combined NUMECA, genetic algorithm, and back propagation neural network. Struct Multidisc Optim2020; 61: 381–409.
13.
BadhurshahRSamadA.Surrogate assisted design optimization of an air turbine. Int J Rotating Mach2014; 2014: 1–8.
14.
ForresterAIJSobesterAKeaneAJ.Engineering design via surrogate modeling. 1st ed.Hoboken/UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd./University of Southamptom, 2008; 20(3): 929–53.
15.
De DonnoRGhidoniANoventaG, et al. Shape optimization of the ERCOFTAC centrifugal pump impeller using open – source software. Optim Eng2019.
16.
QueipoNVHaftkaRTShyyW, et al. Surrogate-based analysis and optimization surrogate-based analysis and optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci2005; 41: 1–28.
17.
BellarySAIAdhavRSiddiqueMH, et al. Application of computational fluid dynamics and surrogate-coupled evolutionary computing to enhance centrifugal-pump performance. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech2016; 10(1): 171–81.
18.
SamadAKimK-YGoelT, et al. Multiple surrogate modeling for axial compressor blade shape optimization. J Propuls. Power2008; 24: 301–310.
19.
DebKPratapAAgarwalS, et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Computat2002; 6: 182–197.
20.
WangHTsukamotoH.Experimental and numerical study of unsteady flow in a diffuser pump at off-design. J Fluids Eng2003; 125: 767–778.
21.
QuailFJScanlonTStricklandM.Development of a regenerative pump impeller using rapid manufacturing techniques. Rapid Prototyp J2010; 16: 337–344.
22.
TiwariSKPandeSAgrawalS, et al. Selection of selective laser sintering materials. Rapid Prototyp J2015; 21: 630–48.
23.
YongmeiJZilongWZhaoJ.Modelling and rapid prototyping of centrifugal pump impeller based on. UG. In: MATEC Web of Conferences 2019, Vol. 291, pp. 1–5. EDP Sciences. 10.1051/matecconf/201929102009.
24.
ANSYS 16.1.Workbench. USA: ANSYS, 2015.
25.
ANSYS 2013.CFX-Pre, CFX-Solver, CFX-Post user manual. USA: ANSYS, n.d.
26.
ShojaeefardMTahaniMEhghaghiMB, et al. Numerical study of the effects of some geometric characteristics of a centrifugal pump impeller that pumps a viscous fluid. Comput Fluids2012; 60: 61–70.
27.
BellarySASiddiqueMHSamadA, et al. Effects of crude oil-water emulsions at various water-cut on the performance of the centrifugal pump. Int J Oil Gas Coal Technol2017; 16(1): 71–88.
28.
AfzalAKimKSeoJ. Effects of Latin hypercube sampling on surrogate modeling and optimization. 2017; 10: 240–253.
29.
GoelTHaftkaRTShyyW, et al. Ensemble of surrogates. Struct Multidisc Optim2007; 33: 199–216.
30.
BoxGEPWilsonKB.On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J R Stat Soc1951; 13: 1–45.
31.
MyersRHMontgomeryDC.Response surface methodology: Process and product in optimization using designed experiments. 1st ed.New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1995.
32.
MartinJDSimpsonTW.Use of kriging models to approximate deterministic computer models. AIAA J2005; 43: 853–863.
33.
ChenSCowanCNGrantPM.Orthogonal least squares learning algorithm for radial basis function networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw1991; 2: 302–309.
34.
KalyanmoyD.Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. 2nd ed. Chicherster, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2001.
35.
SrinivasNDebK.Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evol Comput1994; 2: 221–248.
36.
BellarySASamadA. Improvement of efficiency by design optimization of a centrifugal pump impeller. In: ASME Turbo Expo, Dusseldorf, Germany, June 16-20, 2014, pp.1–11. ASME.
