Transport properties of mixed convective nano-material flow considering the generalized fourier law and a vertical surface: Concept of caputo-time fractional derivative
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2022
Transport properties of mixed convective nano-material flow considering the generalized fourier law and a vertical surface: Concept of caputo-time fractional derivative
With improved characteristics and thermal stability, the nanoparticles show a significant interest in many engineering and industrial processes. The applications of nanomaterials include applications in solar energy systems, chemical reactors, heating and cooling processes, and many bio-medical applications. With such motivations, this investigation aims to address the mixed convection flow of different nanoparticles due to inclined surface in presence of Newtonian heating and slip effects. Two types of nanoparticles like titanium dioxide and aluminum oxide with water base fluid are used to improve the heat transfer rate. The dimensionless governing partial differential equations for this fractional mathematical modal are accomplished by using Caputo-time fractional derivative and Fourier’s law of thermal conductivity. The generalized solution of energy and momentum equations is conquered by applying the Laplace transformation (LT) scheme. To illustrate some more physical insight of the problem and to develop the novelty of this article some special cases of velocity field are reflected whose physical clarification is well known in the literature. Furthermore, to investigate the physical implication of the under-deliberation problem, the graphical illustrations are performed by using math software MATHEMATICA. The interesting observations claimed from this investigation revealed that the interaction of thermal rate of change is more impressive for aluminum oxide. The temperature and velocity profiles are enhanced by varying the numerical value of the fractional constraint at large time scale.
AmanSAbdeljawadTAl-MdallalQ, Natural convection flow of a fluid using Atangana and Baleanu fractional model. Advances in Difference Equations2020; 2020(1): 1–15.
2.
AliFHHamzahHKEgabK, et al.Non-newtonian nanofluid natural convection in a U-shaped cavity under magnetic field. Int J Mech Sci2020; 186: 105887.
3.
TayebiTÖztopHFChamkhaAJ. Natural convection and entropy production in hybrid nanofluid filled-annular elliptical cavity with internal heat generation or absorption. Therm Sci Eng Pro2020; 19: 100605.
4.
PaulADekaRK. Unsteady natural convection flow past an infinite cylinder with thermal and mass stratification. Int J Eng Math2017; 2017: 8410691
5.
DogonchiASTayebiTChamkhaAJ, et al.Natural convection analysis in a square enclosure with a wavy circular heater under magnetic field and nanoparticles. J Therm Anal Calorim2020; 139(1): 661–671.
6.
EzzatMAEl-BaryAAEzzatS, Combined heat and mass transfer for unsteady MHD flow of perfect conducting micropolar fluid with thermal relaxation, Energy Convers Management2011; 52: 934–945.
7.
EzzatMAEl-BaryAA, MHD free convection flow with fractional heat conduction law , Magnetohydrodynamics2012; 48(4): 503–522.
8.
YoussefHMEl-BaryAA, Generalized thermoelastic infinite layer subjected to ramp-type thermal and mechanical loading under three theories-state space approach. J Therm Stresses2009; 32; 1293–1309.
9.
EzzatMAEl-BaryAA, Magneto-thermoelectric viscoelastic materials with memory-dependent derivative involving two-temperature. Int J Appl Electromagnetics Mech2016; 50: 549–567.
10.
AhmadIAzizSAliN, et al.Radiative unsteady hydromagnetic 3D flow model for jeffrey nanofluid configured by an accelerated surface with chemical reaction, Heat Transfer2021; 50(1): 942–966.
11.
VaidyaHRajashekharCPrasadKV, et al.Channel flow of MHD bingham fluid due to peristalsis with multiple chemical reactions: an application to blood flow through narrow arteries, SN Appl Sci2021; 3: 186.
12.
AjeelRKSalimWSIWHasnanK. Design characteristics of symmetrical semicircle-corrugated channel on heat transfer enhancement with nanofluid. Int J Mech Sci2019; 151: 236–250.
13.
AjeelRKSalimWSISopianK, et al.Turbulent convective heat transfer of silica oxide nanofluid through corrugated channels: an experimental and numerical study. Int J Heat Mass Transfer2019; 145: 118806.
14.
AjeelRKSalimWIHasnanK. Experimental and numerical investigations of convection heat transfer in corrugated channels using alumina nanofluid under a turbulent flow regime. Chem Eng Res Des2019; 148: 202–217.
15.
GanvirRBWalkePVKriplaniVM. Heat transfer characteristics in nanofluid-A review. Renew Sustainable Energy Rev2017; 75: 451–460.
16.
AmanSKhanIIsmailZ, et al.Applications of fractional derivatives to nanofluids: exact and numerical solutions. Math Model Nat Phenomena2018; 13(1): 2.
17.
HussananTrungNT. Heat transfer analysis of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose based nanofluid with titania nanoparticles. J Adv Res Fluid Mech Therm Sci2019; 56(2): 248–256.
18.
FarhanaKKadirgamaKNoorMM, et al.CFD modelling of different properties of nanofluids in header and riser tube of flat plate solar collector. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2019; 469(1): 012041.
19.
ElazemNEbaidAAlyE. Radiation effect of MHD on Cu-water and Ag-water nanofluids flow over a stretching sheet: numerical study. J Appl Computat Math2015; 4(4): 1000235–1000243.
20.
NadeemSRiaz khanM.KhanAUMHD oblique stagnation point flow of nanofluid over an oscillatory stretching/shrinking sheet: existence of dual solutions. Physica Scripta2019; 94(7): 075204.
21.
KhanMRPanKKhanAU, et al.Dual solutions for mixed convection flow of SiO2−Al2O3/water hybrid nanofluid near the stagnation point over a curved surface. Physica A: Stat Mech Its Appl2020; 547: 123959.
22.
NadeemSKhanMRKhanAUMHD stagnation point flow of viscous nanofluid over a curved surface. Physica Scripta2019; 94(11): 115207.
23.
KhanMRPanKKhanAU, et al.Comparative study on heat transfer in CNTs-water nanofluid over a curved surface. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer2020; 116: 104707.
24.
LiXKhanAUKhanMR, et al.Oblique stagnation point flow of nanofluids over stretching/shrinking sheet with cattaneo-christov heat flux model: existence of dual solution. Symmetry2019; 11(9): 1070.
25.
KhanMRNumerical analysis of oblique stagnation point flow of nanofluid over a curved stretching/shrinking surface. Physica Scripta2020; 95(10): 105704.
26.
ZhangXHAbidiAAhmedAES, et al.MHD stagnation point flow of nanofluid over a curved stretching/shrinking surface subject to the influence of joule heating and convective condition. Case Stud Therm Eng2021; 26: 101184.
27.
KhanMRLiMMaoS, et al.Comparative study on heat transfer and friction drag in the flow of various hybrid nanofluids effected by aligned magnetic field and nonlinear radiation. Scientific Rep2021; 11(1): 1–14.
28.
HuangWHAbidiAKhanMR, et al.Numerical study of heat transfer and friction drag in MHD viscous flow of a nanofluid subject to the curved surface. Waves in Random and Complex Media2021: 1–16.
29.
KhanMRSaleelCASaeedT, et al.A study of a computational BVP for heat transfer and friction drag in magnetohydrodynamics viscous flow of a nanofluid subject to the curved surface. Proc Inst Mech Eng E: J Process Mech Eng2021; 09544089211046422.
30.
PodlubnyI. Fractional differential equations. Mathematics in Science and Engineering (ed): Academic Press; San Diego, CA, USA: vol. 198, 1999.
31.
BaleanuDFernandezA. On fractional operators and their classifications. Mathematics2019; 7(9): 830.
32.
WangBTahirMImranM, et al.Semi analytical solutions for fractional Oldroyd-B fluid through rotating annulus. IEEE Access2019; 7: 72482–72491.
33.
GharaNDasSMajiS, et al.Effect of radiation on MHD free convection flow past an impulsively moving vertical plate with ramped wall temperature. Am J Scientific Ind Res2012; 3(6): 376–386.
34.
KhanNASVieruDUnsteady flow of generalized casson fluid with fractional derivative due to an infinite plate. The Eur Phys J Plus2016; 131(6): 181.
35.
PodlubnyI. Fractional differential equations: an introduction to fractional derivatives, fractional differential equations, to methods of their solution and some of their applications. Elsevier, 1998.
36.
CaputoMLinear models of dissipation whose Q is almost frequency independent--II. Geophys J Int1967; 13(5): 529–539.
37.
CaputoMFabrizioM. A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel. Progr Fract Differ Appl2015; 1(2): 1–13.
38.
AtanganaAGoufoED. A model of the groundwater flowing within a leaky aquifer using the concept of local variable order derivative. J Nonlinear Sci Appl2015; 8(5): 763–775.
39.
AmkadniMAzzouziAHammouchZ. On the exact solutions of laminar MHD flow over a stretching flat plate. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulation2008; 13(2): 359–368.
40.
SinghDKHammouchZAtanganaA. A fractional epidemiological model for computer viruses pertaining to a new fractional derivative. Appl Mathematics Comput2018; 316: 504–515.
41.
AbroAKhanI. MHD flow of fractional Newtonian fluid embedded in a porous medium via Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivatives. Discrete Continuous Dynamical Syst - S2020; 13(3): 377–387.
42.
AtanganaAKocaI. Chaos in a simple nonlinear system with Atangana-Baleanu derivatives with fractional order. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals2016; 89: 447–454.
43.
AlgahtaniOJJ. Comparing the Atangana-Baleanu and Caputo-Fabrizio derivative with fractional order: Allen Cahn model. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals2016; 89: 552–559.
44.
AwanAUAliMAbroKA. Electroosmotic slip flow of Oldroyd-B fluid between two plates with non-singular kernel. J Comput Appl Mathematics2020; 376: 112885
45.
ElnaqeebTShahNARaufA. Natural convection flows of carbon nanotube Prabhakar‐like fractional second‐grade nanofluids over an infinite plate with Newtonian heating. Mathematical methods in the applied sciences, 2020.
46.
ImranIKAhmadMShahN, et al.Heat and mass transport of differential type fluid with non-integer order time-fractional Caputo derivatives. J Mol Liquids2017; 229: 67–75.
47.
RiazMBIftikharN. A comparative study of heat transfer analysis of MHD Maxwell fluid in view of local and nonlocal differential operators. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals2020; 132: 109556.
