In this paper, steady RANS (Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes) numerical modeling of the return system of a centrifugal compressor is carried out to investigate the effects of various geometrical parameters on the aerodynamic performance of the return system. The effects of using splitter vanes in the return-channel, the width ratio of the return channel and the diverging angle of the walls are examined. Numerical results revealed that using splitter vanes can enhance the stage averaged pressure ratio and polytropic efficiency by 0.74 and 3.21%, respectively. Results showed that increasing the width ratio can enhance the efficiency and pressure ratio near the choke region, however, it has marginal effects on the performance at low flow coefficients. Results also showed that, due to the negligible effects of the diverging angle on the stage performance, using diverging hub wall can reduce the total axial length of the multistage compressor. Finally, a new return system is designed based on the combination of the best geometrical parameters found in the current study. Simulation results demonstrated that the average pressure ratio and efficiency of the compressor have been improved by 0.99% and 4%, respectively, by the newly developed return system compared to the original design.
Al-BusaidiWPilidisP. A new method for reliable performance prediction of multi-stage industrial centrifugal compressors based on stage stacking technique: part II–new integrated model verification. Appl Therm Eng2015; 90: 927–936.
2.
MoosaniaSMZhengX. Effect of internal heat leakage on the performance of a high pressure ratio centrifugal compressor. Appl Therm Eng2017; 111: 317–324.
3.
WangJWenSWangW, et al.Intelligence design method for three-dimensional vaned diffusers in a centrifugal compressor. Proc Inst Mech Eng, A: J Power Energy2018; 232: 674–690.
4.
FranzHRubeCWedekingM, et al.Numerical investigation of the return channel of a high-flow centrifugal compressor stage. In: Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2015: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, Quebec, Canada, June 15–19, 2015.
5.
RubeCRossbachTWedekingM, et al.Experimental and numerical investigation of the flow inside the return channel of a centrifugal process compressor. J Turbomach2016; 138.
6.
RossbachTRubeCWedekingM, et al.Performance measurements of a full-stage centrifugal process gas compressor test rig. In: Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Turbomachinery Fluid dynamics and Thermodynamics, Madrid, Spain, March 23–27, 2015: European Turbomachinery Society.
7.
FowlerHS. The distribution and stability of flow in a rotating channel. J Eng Power1968; 90: 229–235.
8.
DeanR. On the unresolved fluid dynamics of the centrifugal compressor. In Advanced centrifugal compressors. New York, NY, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers. 1971: pp. 1–55.
9.
EckardtD. Detailed flow investigations within a high-speed centrifugal compressor impeller. J Fluids Eng1976; 98: 390–399.
10.
RothsteinE. Experimentelle und theoretische untersuchung der strömungsvorgänge in rückführkanälen von radialverdichterstufen, insbesondere solcher mit geringen kanalbreiten. PhD Thesis. Aachen, Germany: RWTH-Aachen University. 1984.
11.
SimonHRothsteinE. On the development of return passages of multi-stage centrifugal compressors. ASME Fed1983; 3: 1–11.
12.
InoueYKoizumiT. An experimental study on flow patterns and losses in return passages for centrifugal compressors. In: Applied Mechanics, Bioengineering and Fluids Engineering Conference Houston, Texas, 20–22 June 1983.
13.
FisterWZahnGTascheJ. Theoretical and experimental investigations about vaneless return channels of multi-stage radial flow turbomachines. In: Proceedings of the ASME 1982 International Gas Turbine Conference and Exhibit, London, UK, April 18–22, 1982: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), p. V001T01A69.
14.
LenkeLJSimonH. Numerical simulation of the flow through the return channel of multi-stage centrifugal compressors. In: Proceedings of the ASME 1998 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition, Stockholm, Sweden, June 2–5, 1998.
15.
KimSParkJBaekJ. A numerical study of the effects of blade angle distribution on the performance and loss generation of centrifugal compressor impellers. Proc Inst Mech Eng, A: J Power Energy2011; 226: 208–217.
16.
SimpsonAAalburgCSchmitzMB, et al.Application of flow control in a novel sector test rig. J Turbomach2013; 136.
17.
EllisGO. Crossover systems between the stages of centrifugal compressors. J Basic Eng1960; 82: 155–167.
18.
IntholoD. Investigation on the aerodynamic performance of the centrifugal compressor stage for ideal gas. Tianjin University, 2016.
19.
ToyokuraTKanemotoTHattaM. Studies on circular cascades for return channels of centrifugal turbomachinery: 1st report, inverse method and cascade design. Bulletin JSME1986; 29: 2885–2892.
20.
VeressAVan den BraembusscheR. Inverse design and optimization of a return channel for a multistage centrifugal compressor. J Fluids Eng2004; 126: 799–806.
21.
AalburgCSimpsonACarreteroJ, et al.Extension of the stator vane upstream across the 180° bend for a multistage radial compressor stage. In: Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air 2009, Orlando, FL, USA, June 8–12, 2009. pp. 1273–1282.
22.
GlassB. Improved return passages for multistage centrifugal compressors. In: Aeronautics and astronautics. Cambridge, MA, USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2010.
23.
AubryA-R. Return channel loss reduction in multi-stage centrifugal compressors. Cambridge, MA, USA: Dept of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2012.
24.
ReddyKSMurtyGRDasguptaA, et al.Flow investigations in the crossover system of a centrifugal compressor stage. Int J Fluid Mach Syst2010; 3: 11–19.
25.
Srinivasa ReddyKRamana MurtyGSharmaKV. Aerodynamic studies in the static components of a centrifugal compressor stage. Int J Fluid Mach Syst2011; 1: 75–86.
26.
HildebrandtA. Aerodynamic optimisation of a centrifugal compressor return channel and u-turn with genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2011 Turbo Expo: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, Canada, June 6–10, 2011. pp. 1869–1880.
27.
NishidaYKobayashiHNishidaH, et al.Performance improvement of a return channel in a multistage centrifugal compressor using multiobjective optimization. J Turbomach2013; 135: 0310261–0310268.
28.
HildebrandtASchillingF. Numerical and experimental investigation of return channel vane aerodynamics with 2D and 3D vanes. In: Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2016: Turbomachinery technical conference and Exposition, Seoul, South Korea, June 13–17, 2016.
29.
De BellisFGuidottiERubinoDT. Centrifugal compressors return channel optimization by means of advanced 3D CFD. In: Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2015: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, Quebec, Canada. June 15–19, 2015: American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection.
30.
JiCLiCFangJ, et al.Loss mechanism of static interstage components of multistage centrifugal compressors for integrated blade design. Math Probl Eng2018; 2018: 1–16.
31.
GalerkinYRekstinAMareninaL, et al.Optimization of return channels of high flow rate centrifugal compressor stages using CFD methods. Energies2020; 13: 5968.
32.
DixonSLHallC. Fluid mechanics and thermodynamics of turbomachinery. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2013.
33.
FranzH. Numerische untersuchung der durchströmung einer rückführung eines mehrstufigen radialverdichters. Aachen, Germany: RWTH Aachen University2015.
34.
OhJMEngedaAChungMK. A numerical study of the u-turn bend in return channel systems for multistage centrifugal compressors. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci2005; 219: 749–756.
35.
Srinivasa ReddyKRamana MurtyGSharmaK. Aerodynamic studies in the static components of a centrifugal compressor stage. J Mech Eng Scien2011; 1: 75–86.
36.
PinnintiRRSaikiranM. Aerodynamic analysis of return channel vanes in centrifugal compressors. Int J Mech Eng2016; 5: 73–82.
37.
HuangJ-MChiangC-PChenJ-F, et al.Numerical investigation of the intercooler of a two-stage refrigerant compressor. Appl Therm Eng2007; 27: 2536–2548.
38.
HariharanCGovardhanM. Improving performance of an industrial centrifugal blower with parallel wall volutes. Appl Therm Eng2016; 109: 53–64.
39.
XiGTianYGuoY, et al.Experimental and numerical investigations on flow losses of a u-bend and return channel system for centrifugal compressor. In: Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2019: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, Phoenix, AZ, USA, June 17–21, 2019.
40.
SwainDEngedaA. Effect of impeller blade trimming on the performance of a 5.5:1 pressure ratio centrifugal compressor. Proc Inst Mech Eng, A: J Power Energy2014; 228: 602–613.
41.
DuPNingF. Validation of a novel mixing-plane method for multistage turbomachinery steady flow analysis. Chinese J Aeronaut2016; 29: 1563–1574.
42.
YangMShuMWangX, et al.Rotor-stator aerodynamic interaction of centrifugal compressor at pulsating backpressure conditions. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2022; 96: 109009.
43.
ZouZDingC. A new similarity method for turbomachinery with different working media. Appl Therm Eng2018; 133: 170–178.
44.
AnishSSitaramN. Computational investigation of impeller—diffuser interaction in a centrifugal compressor with different types of diffusers. Proc Inst Mech Eng, A: J Power Energy2008; 223: 167–178.
45.
HalderPRheeSHSamadA. Numerical optimization of wells turbine for wave energy extraction. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng2017; 9: 11–24.
CaoZGaoXZhangX, et al.Effect of endwall passage vortex generator on corner stall of a tandem compressor cascade. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2022; 94: 108946.
48.
GalindoJGilANavarroR, et al.Analysis of the impact of the geometry on the performance of an automotive centrifugal compressor using CFD simulations. Appl Therm Eng2019; 148: 1324–1333.
49.
PinarbasiA. Experimental hot-wire measurements in a centrifugal compressor with vaned diffuser. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2008; 29: 1512–1526.
50.
PinarbasiA. Turbulence measurements in the inlet plane of a centrifugal compressor vaneless diffuser. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2009; 30: 266–275.
51.
RossbachTBispingJGratesDR, et al.Secondary flows in the return system of a centrifugal compressor stage. J Turbomach2020; 142: 142.
52.
FradinC. Investigation of the three dimensional flow near the exit of two backswept transonic centrifugal impellers. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines, Cincinnati, OH, USA, June 14–19, 1987. 149–155.
53.
MillourV. 3D flow computations in a centrifugal compressor with splitter blade including viscous effect simulation. In: Proceedings of the ICAS Congress, Jerusalem, Israel, August 28–September 2, 1988, pp. 842–847.
54.
MalikAZhengQ. Effect of double splitter blades position in a centrifugal compressor impeller. Proc Inst Mech Eng, A: J Power Energy2018; 233: 689–701.
55.
XuCAmanoRS. Centrifugal compressor performance improvements through impeller splitter location. J Energy Resour Technol2017; 140: 140.
56.
KhalafallahMGSalehHSAliSM, et al.CFD investigation of flow through a centrifugal compressor diffuser with splitter blades. J Eng Appl Sci2021; 68: 43.
