Environmental and exergoeconomic assessment of a geothermal-LNG hybrid S-CO 2 system toward sustainable power generation

Abstract

This study presents a hybrid recompression supercritical CO₂ (S-CO₂) power cycle that simultaneously utilizes geothermal heat and the cryogenic exergy of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to enhance sustainable electricity generation. A comprehensive modeling framework combining thermodynamic, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental analyses, together with advanced exergy-based methods, is developed to identify the dominant sources of inefficiencies and cost/environmental burdens. The system performance is further evaluated through sensitivity analyses and multi-objective optimization using the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), considering exergy efficiency, unit product cost, and environmental impact as competing objectives. The results indicate that the natural gas turbine (NT), LNG pump (LP), and heat exchangers HE-2 and HE-3 exhibit the highest potential for improvement based on avoidable exergy destruction and cost contribution. Compared to the baseline design, the optimized configuration improves the overall exergy efficiency from 54.96% to 55.94% (1.78% improvement), reduces the average unit product cost from 5.33 to 5.10 $/GJ (4.32% decrease), and decreases the average unit environmental impact from 9.11 to 8.70 (4.50% decrease). These results demonstrate that the integration of geothermal energy with LNG cryogenic exergy provides a promising pathway for improving resource utilization and reducing the environmental footprint of hybrid power systems.

Keywords

Hybrid power geothermal-LNG integration cryogenic exergy exergoeconomic analysis exergoenvironmental assessment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Park

Lee

You

, et al. Economic process selection of liquefied natural gas regasification: power generation and energy storage applications. Ind Eng Chem Res 2019; 58: 4946–4956. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00179

Wang

, et al. Thermodynamic and economic analysis of a high-efficiency system integrating ORC power generation, CO₂ capture, and CO₂ storage driven by complementary LNG cold energy and flue gas waste heat. Acad J Sci Technol 2024; 13: 2771–3032. https://doi.org/10.54097/9gekrg40

Lee

Han

. Simulation and optimization of multi-component organic Rankine cycle integrated with post-combustion capture process. Comput Chem Eng 2015; 83: 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.03.021

Liu

Cao

, et al. Advanced exergoeconomic evaluation on supercritical carbon dioxide recompression Brayton cycle. J Clean Prod; 256: 120537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120537, Epub ahead of print 20 May 2020.

Dutta

Karimi

Farooq

. Economic feasibility of power generation by recovering cold energy during LNG (liquefied natural gas) regasification. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 2018; 6: 10687–10695. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02020

Sun

Yan

Abed

, et al. Evaluation and optimization of a new energy cycle based on geothermal wells, liquefied natural gas and solar thermal energy. Process Saf Environ Prot 2022; 168: 544–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.10.029

Zhang

Ahmad

Cui

, et al. Energy, exergy, hermoeconomic analysis of a novel multi-generation system based on geothermal, Kalina, double effect absorption chiller, and LNG regasification. Desalination; 586: 117830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2024.117830, Epub ahead of print 1 October 2024.

Xie

Zheng

. Techno-economic optimization of a geothermal multi-product layout composed of a CO₂ trans-critical Rankine-LNG system integrated with ejector cooling system and HDH desalination unit. Desalination; 593: 118180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2024.118180, Epub ahead of print 5 January 2025.

Lin

Zhou

Chauhdary

, et al. 4E assessment of a geothermal-driven combined power and cooling system coupled with a liquefied natural gas cold energy recovery unit. Renew Energy; 240: 122165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.122165, Epub ahead of print 15 February 2025.

10.

Wang

Shi

Che

. Thermodynamic optimization of the operating parameters for a combined power cycle utilizing low-temperature waste heat and LNG cold energy. Appl Therm Eng 2013; 59: 490–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.05.048

11.

Hassani Mokarram

Mosaffa

. Investigation of the thermoeconomic improvement of integrating enhanced geothermal single flash with transcritical organic Rankine cycle. Energy Convers Manag; 213: 112831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112831, Epub ahead of print 1 June 2020.

12.

Wang

Dai

, et al. Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a transcritical CO₂ geothermal power generation system based on the cold energy utilization of LNG. Appl Therm Eng 2014; 70: 531–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.05.084

13.

Uysal

Ozen

Kurt

, et al. A comparative assessment of SPECO and MOPSA on costing of exergy destruction. Int J Exergy 2020; 32: 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijex.2020.107744

14.

Özen

Hançer Güleryüz

Acılar

. Advanced exergo-economic analysis of an advanced adiabatic compressed air energy storage system with the modified productive structure analysis method and multi-objective optimization study. J Energy Storage 2024; 81: 110380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.110380, Epub ahead of print 15.

15.

Khoshgoftar Manesh

Navid

Blanco Marigorta

, et al. New procedure for optimal design and evaluation of cogeneration system based on advanced exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses. Energy 2013; 59: 314–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.06.017

16.

Tsatsaronis

Morosuk

. A general exergy-based method for combining a cost analysis with an environmental impact analysis: Part I—Theoretical Development. In: Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE2008), Boston, MA, USA, 2008, Paper No. IMECE2008-67218, pp. 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2008-67218

17.

Verma

Pant

Snasel

. A comprehensive review on NSGA-II for multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems. IEEE Access 2021; 9: 57757–57791. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3070634

18.

Wang

Dai

, et al. Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power generation system. Geothermics 2015; 55: 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2015.01.012

19.

Ruiz-Casanova

Rubio-Maya

Ambriz-Díaz

, et al. Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analyses and ANN-based three-objective optimization of a supercritical CO₂ recompression Brayton cycle driven by a high-temperature geothermal reservoir. Energy; 311: 133381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133381, Epub ahead of print 1 December 2024.