Reliability-based design optimization and working capability quantification for a double-suction centrifugal fan subject to ambient temperature uncertainty

Abstract

The double-suction centrifugal fans are designed under a standard atmospheric condition but are usually operated under off-design conditions where the ambient temperature varies, in which the density and viscosity of the air are different from those of the standard condition, thereby affecting the fan’s performance. This work performed a surrogate-based multi-objective reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) on a double-suction centrifugal fan considering the ambient temperature (T) uncertainty. The RBDO intends to improve the static pressure rise (P_s) and static pressure efficiency (η_s) of the fan by optimizing the design variables of outlet installation angle, camberline radius and number of the blades, and the volute pitch. The global sensitivity analysis using Sobol’ and Borgonovo indices reveal that the volute pitch dominates η_s, while the blade camberline radius and volute pitch dominate P_s. The Borgonovo index highlights the non-negligible effect of blade outlet installation angle on the probability distribution of P_s and η_s. The effectiveness of RBDO was validated through the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations. The RBDO improves P_s and η_s by 10.44% and 1.87%, respectively, at T = 20°C where the fan is designed, and by 8.62% and 2.00% at T = 0°C, and 9.39% and 2.06% at T = 40°C, revealing a robust effectiveness of RBDO. The working capability of the optimized fan within a range of ambient temperature is quantified to evaluate the trade-off between performance improvement and feasible reliability. The design feasibility domain reduces significantly due to the temperature sensitivity which determines the safety margin as the target static pressure rise exceeds 84 Pa. An analysis on flow physics demonstrates that the optimized fans effectively suppress the separation and recirculating vortices, weaken the entropy generation, and generate a better uniform distribution of flow angle and velocity in multiple blade passages of the impeller, which contributes to the improved performance of the fan.

Keywords

Double-suction centrifugal fan reliability-based design optimization aerodynamic optimization design feasibility global sensitivity analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Eck

. Design and operation of centrifugal, axial-flow and cross-flow fans. Pergamon Press, 1973.

Bleier

. Fan handbook: selection, application, and design. McGraw-Hill, 1998.

Pérez-Lombard

Ortiz

Pout

. A review on buildings energy consumption information. Energy Build 2008; 40(3): 394–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.03.007

Neise

. Noise reduction in centrifugal fans: a literature survey. J Sound Vib 1976; 45(3): 375–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460x(76)90394-1

Wen

Mao

Yang

, et al. Design method for the volute profile of a squirrel cage fan with space limitation. J Turbomach 2016; 138(8): 081001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032537

Cho

Kawahashi

Hirahara

, et al. Application of stereoscopic particle image velocimetry to experimental analysis of flow through multi-blade fan. JSME Int J Series B 2005; 48(1): 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmeb.48.25

Kitadume

Kawahashi

Hirahara

, et al. Experimental analysis of 3D flow in scroll casing of multi-blade fan for air-conditioner. J Fluid Sci Technol 2007; 2(2): 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1299/jfst.2.302

Liu

Dang

. Performance improvement of centrifugal fan by using CFD. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 2008; 2(2): 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2008.11015216

Chen

Yang

, et al. Asymmetric flow in a double-suction centrifugal fan induced by an inclined impeller. Phys Fluids 2024; 36(1): 017113. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0178927

10.

Liu

Yang

Wei

, et al. Effect of an axially offset impeller on the transient physics of asymmetric flow in a double-suction centrifugal fan. J Appl Fluid Mech 2025; 18(7): 1873–1892. https://doi.org/10.47176/jafm.18.7.3184

11.

Liu

Jiang

Wang

, et al. Numerical and experimental investigations on non-axisymmetric D-type inlet nozzle for a squirrel-cage fan. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 2021; 15(1): 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2021.1883115

12.

Dou

Lin

, et al. Design for a squirrel cage fan with double arc blade. J Appl Fluid Mech 2020; 13(3): 881–891. https://doi.org/10.29252/jafm.13.03.30551

13.

Luo

Zhu

, et al. Surrogate model on the extension operation range of an isolated centrifugal fan. J Appl Fluid Mech 2024; 17(4): 900–911.

14.

Zhang

Yang

, et al. Noise reduction and aerodynamic performance improvement of a multiblade centrifugal fan. Phys Fluids 2024; 36(12): 125168. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0245393

15.

Liu

Wang

, et al. Orthogonal optimization design of a sirocco fan and numerical analysis on the internal flow characteristics. J Pow Energy 2024; 238(1): 90–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/09576509231195120

16.

Zhou

Yang

, et al. Research on blade design method of multi-blade centrifugal fan for building efficient ventilation based on Hicks-Henne function. Sustain Energy Technol Assessments 2021; 43: 100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100971

17.

Liu

Zhang

Yang

, et al. Optimization design and experiment of a double-suction centrifugal fan with flow physics analysis. Phys Fluids 2025; 37(2): 027183. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0254454

18.

Hasofer

Lind

. Exact and invariant second-moment code format. J Eng Mech Div 1974; 100(1): 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1061/jmcea3.0001848

19.

Rackwitz

Fiessler

. Structural reliability under combined random load sequences. Comput Struct 1978; 9(5): 489–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(78)90046-9

20.

Dai

Wang

. Reliability analysis in engineering applications. Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1992.

21.

Enevoldsen

. Reliability-based optimization as an information tool. Mech Struct Mach 1994; 22(1): 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/08905459408905207

22.

Chandu

SVL

Grandhi

. General purpose procedure for reliability based structural optimization under parametric uncertainties. Adv Eng Software 1995; 23(1): 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0965-9978(95)00049-w

23.

Choi

Park

. A new study on reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 1999; 121(4): 557–564. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2829499

24.

Aoues

Chateauneuf

. Benchmark study of numerical methods for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 2010; 41: 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-009-0412-2

25.

Lian

Kim

. Reliability-based design optimization of a transonic compressor. AIAA J 2006; 44(2): 368–375. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.16262

26.

Hong

Lee

Jun

, et al. Reliability-based design optimization of axial compressor using uncertainty model for stall margin. J Mech Sci Technol 2011; 25(3): 731–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-011-0103-y

27.

Tai

Tan

Rahman

NFA

, et al. Reliability based multi-objective thermodynamic cycle optimisation of turbofan engines using Luus-Jaakola algorithm. Energy Eng J Assoc Energy Eng 2021; 118(4): 1057–1068. https://doi.org/10.32604/ee.2021.014866

28.

Wang

Zhong

Qian

, et al. Physical properties of air. In: Wind Turbine Aerodynamic Performance Calculation. Springer, 2023, pp. 3–10.

29.

Wang

Zhang

. Numerical investigation on flow mechanisms of a squirrel cage fan. J Pow Energy 2019; 233(1): 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957650918773932

30.

Jiang

Liu

, et al. Effects of cut volute profile on squirrel cage fan performance and flow field. Adv Mech Eng 2018; 10(3): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018766915

31.

Sutherland

. The viscosity of gases and molecular force. Philosophical Magazine Series 5 1893; 36(223): 507–531.

32.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration . National aeronautics and space administration and U.S. air force. U.S. standard atmosphere, 1976. Report no. NASA-TM-X-74335. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1976.

33.

Haldar

Mahadevan

. Probability, reliability, and statistical methods in engineering design. John Wiley & Sons, 2000.

34.

Rao

. Engineering optimization: theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons, 2019.

35.

Feller

. An introduction to probability theory and its applications. John Wiley & Sons, 1968, Vol. 1.

36.

Bijl

Lucor

Mishra

, et al. Uncertainty quantification in computational fluid dynamics. Springer, 2013.

37.

Shen

Huang

Liu

. Reliability-based design optimization of a centrifugal compressor considering manufacturing uncertainties. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Reliability Systems Engineering (ICRSE), Beijing, China, 10-12 July 2017.

38.

McKay

Beckman

Conover

. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 1979; 21(2): 239–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1979.10489755

39.

Morris

Mitchell

. Exploratory designs for computational experiments. J Stat Plann Inference 1995; 43(3): 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3758(94)00035-t

40.

Stein

. Large sample properties of simulations using Latin hypercube sampling. Technometrics 1987; 29(2): 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1987.10488205

41.

Marelli

Lüthen

Sudret

. UQLab user manual – polynomial chaos expansions. ETH Zurich, 2024. Report.

42.

Lee

Chan

Zahtila

, et al. Surrogate models for multiregime flow problems. Phys Rev Fluids 2025; 10: 024703. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevfluids.10.024703

43.

Marelli

Sudret

. UQLab: a framework for uncertainty quantification in Matlab. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Vulnerability, Risk Analysis and Management (ICVRAM). Liverpool, UK, 13-16 July 2014, pp. 2554–2563.

44.

Blatman

Sudret

. An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis. Probab Eng Mech 2010; 25(2): 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2009.10.003

45.

Blatman

. Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion for uncertainty propagation and sensitivity analysis. Ph.D. thesis. Blaise Pascal University - Clermont II, 2009.

46.

Sobol’

. Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models. Math Model Civ Eng 1993; 1(4): 407–414.

47.

Borgonovo

. A new uncertainty importance measure. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2007; 92(6): 771–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.04.015

48.

Chen

. Sequential optimization and reliability assessment method for efficient probabilistic design. J Mech Des 2004; 126(2): 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1649968

49.

Deb

Pratap

Agarwal

, et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 2002; 6(2): 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017

50.

Kock

Herwig

. Local entropy production in turbulent shear flows: a high-Reynolds-number model with wall functions. Int J Heat Mass Tran 2004; 47(10-11): 2205–2215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2003.11.025

51.

Menter

. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 1994; 32(8): 1598–1605. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149

52.

Qian

Liu

, et al. Characterization of energy loss in jet mechanism of a pelton turbine. Int J Fluid Eng 2024; 1: 033502. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0209402