Energy,economic,and environmental analysis of combined heating and power-organic Rankine cycle and combined cooling,heating,and power-organic Rankine cycle systems

Abstract

Combined heating and power (CHP) and combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) systems generate electricity and usable heat on-site from one fuel source while organic Rankine cycles (ORC) generate power from low-temperature heat sources. During the operation of CHP and CCHP systems, there are many instances when the recovered exhaust heat is greater than the required thermal load of the building. In these situations, an ORC can be used to capture the excess heat in order to produce additional electricity. Therefore, combining an ORC system with a CHP system (CHP-ORC) or a CCHP system (CCHP-ORC) can further increase the fuel utilization of the system, thereby reducing the operational costs, primary energy consumption (PEC), and carbon dioxide emissions (CDE). This article examines the economic, energetic, and environmental performance of CHP-ORC and CCHP-ORC systems under the operational strategies of follow the electric load (FEL) and follow the electric load with the option of turning off (FEL/OFF) for the city of Boulder, Colorado. Their performance is compared to a stand-alone CHP and CCHP system, respectively, between systems, and to a reference building. Results show that under the FEL operation, the addition of an ORC to either the CHP or CCHP system lowered the operational costs, PEC, and CDE by about 12 per cent, 13 per cent, and 17 per cent, respectively, from the standalone system. In addition, only when the systems operate FEL/OFF strategy minimizing cost or PEC, the cost and PEC could be reduced below the levels of the reference building.

Keywords

combined heating and power combined cooling heating and power organic Rankine cycle waste heat recovery primary energy consumption

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cardona

Piacentino

Cardona

, ‘Matching economical, energetic and environmental benefits: an analysis for hybrid CHCP-heat pump systems’ Energy Convers. Manage. 47 (2002): 3530–3542.

Mago

P. J.

Fumo

Chamra

L. M.

, ‘Performance analysis of CCHP and CHP systems operating following the thermal and electric load’ Int. J. Energy Res. 33 (2002): 852–864.

Mago

P. J.

Chamra

L. M.

, ‘Analysis and optimization of CCHP systems based on energy, economical, and environmental considerations’ Energy Build. 41 (2002): 1099–1106.

Hueffed

A. K.

Mago

P. J.

, ‘Influence of prime mover size and operational strategy on the performance of combined cooling, heating, and power systems under different cost structures’ Proc. IMechE, Part A: J. Power and Energy 224 (5) (2010): 591–605 DOI: 10.1243/09576509JPE922.

Hueffed

, Analysis and optimization of CHP, CCHP, CHP-ORC, and CCHP-ORC systems (Mississippi State University 2010) Dissertation.

Jalalzadeh-Azar

A. A.

, ‘A Comparison of electrical and thermal load following CHP systems’ ASHRAE Trans. 110 (2) (2004): 85–94.

Jalalzadeh-Azar

A. A.

, ‘A parametric analysis of a grid-independent BCHP system: focusing on impact of technological advancements’ ASHRAE Trans. 109 (2002): 69–78.

Mago

P. J.

Hueffed

Chamra

L. M.

, ‘Analysis and optimization of the use of CHP-ORC systems for small commercial buildings’ Energy Build. 42 (2012): 1491–1498.

Chacartegui

Sánchez

Muñoz

Sánchez

, ‘Alternative ORC bottoming cycles for combined cycle power plants’ Appl. Energy 86 (2002): 2162–2170.

10.

Al-Sulaiman

F. A.

Dincer

Hamdullahpur

, ‘Exergy analysis of an integrated solid oxide fuel cell and organic Rankine cycle for cooling, heating and power production’ J. Power Sources 195 (2012): 2346–2354.

11.

Akkaya

A. V.

Sahin

, ‘A study on performance of solid oxide fuel cell-organic Rankine cycle combined system’ Int. J. Energy Res. 33 (2002): 553–564.

12.

Maizza

, ‘Working fluids in non-steady flows for waste energy recovery systems’ Appl. Thermal Eng. 16 (7) (1996): 579–590.

13.

Vijayaraghavan

Goswami

D. Y.

, ‘Organic working fluids for a combined power and cooling cycle’ ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol. 127 (2002): 125–130.

14.

Maizza

, ‘Unconventional working fluids in organic Rankine-cycles for waste energy recovery systems’ Appl. Thermal Eng. 21 (3) (2001): 381–390.

15.

Niggeman

R. E.

Greenlee

W. J.

Lacey

, ‘Fluid selection and optimization of an organic Rankine cycle waste heat power conversion system’ In Proceedings of the ASME 78-WA, 6 January 1978, vol. 6.

16.

Lee

M. J.

Tien

D. L.

Shao

C. T.

, ‘Thermophysical capability of ozozno safe working fluids for an organic Rankine-cycle system’ Heat Recov. Syst. CHP 13 (1991): 409–418.

17.

Dai

Wang

Gao

, ‘Parametric optimization and comparative study of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for low grade waste heat recovery’ Energy Convers. Manage. 50 (2002): 576–582.

18.

Mago

P. J.

Chamra

L. M.

Somayaji

, ‘Performance analysis of different working fluids for use in organic Rankine cycles’ Proc. IMechE, Part A: J. Power and Energy 221 (2002): 255–263 DOI: 10.1243/09576509JPE372.

19.

Torcellini

Deru

Griffith

Benne

Halverson

Winiarski

Crawley

D. B.

, ‘DOE commercial buildings benchmark models: preprint, National Renewable Energy Laboratory’ (2008): NREL/CP-550-43291.

20.

US Department of Energy. ‘EnergyPlus energy simulation software’ (2010) available from http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/energyplus/.

21.

Cho

, Dynamic simulation and optimal real-time operation of CHP systems for buildings (Mississippi State University 2009) Dissertation.

22.

Kohler Company. (2010) available from www.kohlerpower.com/residential.

23.

US Department of Energy. ‘New construction benchmark data files’ (2010) available from http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/commercial_initiative/new_construction.html.