This study is an analysis of several telephone conversations between FBI negotiators and David Koresh during the 51-day FBI—Branch Davidian standoff outside Waco, Texas, in 1993. The analysis shows how different reframing practices reveal interactional troubles the negotiators faced in dealing with the incompatibility of their legal frame for the situation and the Davidians' religious one. These practices shed new light on reframing in crisis negotiation steeped in moral conflict, describing it as a problematic conversational practice rather than a prescribed path to resolution.
` Activities of the Federal Law Enforcement Agencies Toward the Branch Davidians, Parts 1—3 ', 104th Cong., 1st Sess. 72 (1996).
2.
Agne, R.R. and Tracy, K. (1998) `Not Answering Questions: A Police Chief's Strategies in a Sensationalized Murder', in J.F. Klumpp (ed.) Argument in a Time of Change, pp. 238—42. Annandale, VA: National Communication Association .
3.
Agne, R.R. and Tracy, K. (2001) ` “Bible Babble”: Naming the Interactional Trouble at Waco ', Discourse Studies3: 269—94 .
4.
Atkinson, J.M. and Heritage, J. (eds) (1984) Structure of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
5.
Bailey, B. and Darden, B. (1993) Mad Man in Waco. Waco, TX: WRS .
6.
Bateson, G. (1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine .
7.
Bazerman, M.H. (1993) ` Negotiator Judgment: A Critical Look at the Rationality Assumption ', in J.W. Breslin and J.Z. Rubin (eds) NegotiationTheory and Practice, pp. 197—210 . Cambridge, MA : The Program on Negotiation Books.
8.
Beckwith, C. (1994) `What Went Wrong in Waco? Poor Planning, Bad Tactics Result in Botched Raid', in J.R. Lewis (ed.) From the Ashes: Making Sense of Waco, pp. 67—70. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield .
9.
Bodker, A.M. and Jamison, J.K. (1997) ` Mediation as Mutual Influence: Reexamining the Use of Framing and Reframing ', Mediation Quarterly14: 237—49 .
10.
Clark, A.J. (1998) ` Reframing: A Therapeutic Technique in Group Counseling' , Journal for Specialists in Group Work23: 66—73 .
11.
Conley, J.M. and O'Barr, W.M. (1998) Just Words: Law, Language, and Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
12.
Coyne, J.C. (1985) ` Toward a Theory of Frames and Reframing: The Social Nature of Frames', Journal of Marital andFamily Therapy11: 337—44 .
13.
Craig, R.T. (1989) ` Communication as a Practical Discipline ', in B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B.J. O'Keefe and E. Wartella (eds) RethinkingCommunication, Volume 1: Paradigm Issues, pp. 97—124 . Newbury Park, CA : SAGE .
14.
Craig, R.T. (1992) ` Practical Communication Theory and the Pragma—Dialectical Approach in Conversation ', in F.H. van Eemeren , R. Grootendorst, J.A. Brair and C.A. Willard (eds) Argumentation Illuminated, pp. 51—61 . Amsterdam: Sic. Sat .
15.
Craig, R.T. (1995) `The Normativity of Practical Theory: Two Approaches ', in F.H. van Eemeren , R. Grootendorst , J.A. Brair and C.A. Willard (eds) Perspectives and Approaches, pp. 173—82. Amsterdam: Sic. Sat .
16.
Craig, R.T. and Tracy, K. (1995) ` Grounded Practical Theory: The Case of Intellectual Discussion' , Communication Theory5: 248—72 .
17.
Davies, E. (1988) ` Reframing, Metaphors, Myths and Fairy-Tales ', Journal of Family Therapy10: 83—92 .
18.
De Drue, C.K.W. , Emans, B.J.M. and van de Vliert, E. (1992) `The Influence of Own Cognitive and Other's Communicated Gain or Loss Frame on Negotiation Behavior ', The International Journal of Confilict Management3: 115—32 .
19.
Deutsch, M. (2000) ` Cooperation and Competition ', in M. Deutsch and P.T. Coleman (eds) The Handbook of Confilict Resolution: Theory and Practice, pp. 21—40 . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
20.
Docherty, J.S. (2001) Learning Lessons fromWaco : When the Parties Bring Their Gods to the Table. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press .
21.
Donohue, W.A. (1998) ` Managing Equivocality and Relational Paradox in the Oslo Peace Negotiations', Journal of Language andSocial Psychology17: 72—96 .
22.
Donohue, W.A. and Roberto, A.J. (1993) ` An Empirical Examination of Three Models of Integrative and Distributive Bargaining', The International Journal of Confi lictManagement7: 209—29 .
23.
Donohue, W.A. , Ramesh, C. and Borchgrevink, C. (1991) ` Crisis Bargaining: Tracking Relational Paradox in Hostage Negotiation' , The International Journal of Confilict Management2: 257—74 .
24.
Drake, L.E. and Donohue, W.A. (1996) ` Communiative Framing Theory in Conflict Resolution' , Communication Research23: 297—322 .
25.
Drew, P. (1984) `Speakers' Reportings in Invitation Sequences', in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures in Conversation Analysis, pp. 129—51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
26.
Edwards, J.C. (2001) ` Self-fulfilling Prophecy and Escalating Commitment: Fuel for the Waco Fire', The Journal of AppliedBehavior Science37: 343—60 .
27.
Eliason, G. (2000) `Spirituality and Counseling of the Older Adult ', in A. Tomer (ed.) Death Attitudes and the Older Adult, pp. 241—56. Philadelphia : Brunner-Routledge .
28.
Elliott, M. , Gray, B. and Lewicki, R.J. (2003) `Lessons Learned about the Framing and Reframing of Intractable Environmental Conflicts', in R. Lewicki , B. Gray and M. Elliott (eds) Making Sense of Intractable Environmental Confilicts: Concepts and Cases, pp. 409—35. Washington, DC: Island Press .
29.
Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R. (1997) `Critical Discourse Analysis', in T.A. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction , pp. 258—84. London : SAGE .
30.
Fisher, R. and Ury, W. (1981) Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving in. New York: Penguin .
31.
Freeman, S.A. , Littlejohn, S.W. and Pearce, W.B. (1992) ` Communication and Moral Conflict', Western Journal ofCommunication56: 311—29 .
32.
Fuselier, G.D. , Van Zandt, C.R. and Lanceley, F.J. (1991) ` Hostage/Barricade Incidents: High-Risk Factors and the Action Criteria', FBI Law EnforcementBulletin60: 6—12 .
33.
Gaffney, E.M. (1995) `The Waco Tragedy: Constitutional Concerns and Policy Perspectives', in S.A. Wright (ed.) Armageddon in Waco: Critical Perspectives on the Branch Davidians , pp. 323—58. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
34.
Gale, J.E. and Brown-Standridge, M.D. (1988) ` Ratification and Utilization: Hypnotic Techniques to Facilitate Reframing During Early Marital Therapy', Journal of Marital andFamily Therapy14: 371—82 .
35.
Gee, J.P. (1999) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. London: Routledge .
36.
Goffman, E. (1974) Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
37.
Goodpaster, G. (1997) A Guide to Negotiation and Mediation. Irvington-on-Hudson , NY: Transnational .
38.
Gray, B. (2003) `Framing of Environmental Disputes', in R. Lewicki , B. Gray and M. Elliott (eds) Making Sense of Intractable Environmental Confilicts: Concepts and Cases, pp. 11—34. Washington, DC: Island Press .
39.
Gray, B. (2004) ` Strong Opposition: Frame-Based Resistance to Collaboration', Journal ofApplied Social Psychology14: 166—76 .
40.
Hammer, M.R. (2001) `Conflicts Under Crisis Conditions', in W.F. Eadie and P.E. Nelson (eds) The Language of Confilict and Resolution, pp. 57—80. Thousand Oaks , CA : SAGE .
41.
Hammer, M.R. and Rogan, R.G. (1997) `Negotiation Models in Crisis Situations: The Value of a Communication-Based Approach', in R.G. Rogan , M.R. Hammer and C.R. van Zandt (eds), Dynamic Processes of Crisis Negotiation: Theory, Research, and Practice, pp. 9—24. Westport, CT: Praeger .
42.
Hardy, D.T. and Kimball, R. (2001) This is Not an Assault: Penetrating the offiicial Web of Lies Regarding the Waco Incident. Philadelphia : Xlibris .
43.
Hare, A. (1997) `Training Crisis Negotiators: Updating Negotiation Techniques and Training', in R.G. Rogan , M.R. Hammer and C.R. van Zandt (eds) Dynamic Processes of Crisis Negotiation: Theory, Research, and Practice, pp. 151—60. Westport, CT: Praeger .
44.
Haus, C.H. and Hamblin, M.L. (1993) In the Wake ofWaco : Why Were Adventists Among the Victims? Hagerstown, MD : Review and Herald.
45.
Hecker, L.L. and Trepper, T.S. (2000) ` REM Approach to Conflict Resolution for Couples Therapy', Journal of FamilyPsychotherapy11: 47—57 .
46.
Hicks, R.C. (1994) `Cult Label Made Waco Violence Inevitable', in J.R. Lewis (ed.) From the Ashes: Making Sense ofWaco , pp. 63—6. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield .
47.
Holmes, M.E. (1992) `Phase Structures in Negotiation', in L.L. Putnam and M.E. Roloff (eds) Communication and Negotiation, pp. 83—105. Newbury Park , CA : SAGE .
48.
Holmes, M.E. (1997) `Processes and Patterns in Hostage Negotiations ', in R.G. Rogan , M.R. Hammer and C.R. van Zandt (eds) Dynamic Processes of Crisis Negotiation: Theory, Research, and Practice, pp. 77—94. Westport, CT: Praeger .
49.
Houteff, V.T. (1946) ` The Way Back to Eden ', Timely Greetings1(1): 1—15 .
50.
Investigation into the Tragedy at Waco: New Evidence 106th Cong., 2nd Sess 599 (2000).
51.
Isenhart, M.W. and Spangle, M. (2000) Collaborative Approaches to Resolving Confilict . Thousand Oaks , CA : SAGE .
52.
Jones, C.W. (1986) ` Frame Cultivation: Helping New Meanings Take Root in Family', The American Journal ofFamily Therapy14: 57—68 .
53.
Katz, T.Y. and Block, C.J. (2000) `Process Outcome Goal Orientations in Conflict Situations: The Importance of Framing', in M. Deutsch and P.T. Coleman (eds) The Handbook of Confilict Resolution: Theory and Practice, pp. 279—88. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
54.
Kopel, D.B. and Blackman, P.H. (1997) No More Wacos: What's Wrong with the Federal Law Enforcement and How to Fix It. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books .
55.
Krpan, I. and Horvat, N. (1999) ` Reframing in Daily Practice' , Psychiatria Danubina11: 25—9 .
Lewicki, R. , Gray, B. and Elliott, W.M. (eds) (2003) Making Sense of Intractable Environmental Confilicts: Concepts and Cases . Washington, DC: Island Press .
58.
Lindsay, S.A. (1999) ` Waco and Andover: An Application of Kenneth Burke's Concept of Psychotic Entelechy ', Quarterly Journal of Speech85: 268—84 .
59.
Linedecker, C.L. (1993) Massacre at Waco, Texas. New York: St. Martin's Press .
60.
Linell, P. (1998) ` Discourse Across Boundaries: On Recontextualizations and the Blending of Voice in Professional Discourse' , Text18: 143—57 .
61.
Littlejohn, S.W. and Domenici, K. (2001) Engaging Communication in Confilict: Systemic Practice . Thousand Oaks , CA : SAGE .
62.
McMains, M.J. (1996) Crisis Negotiations: Managing Critical Incidents and Hostage Situations in Law Enforcement and Corrections. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson .
63.
Madigan, T. (1993) See No Evil: Blind Devotion and Bloodshed in David Koresh's Holy War. Forth Worth, TX: The Summit Group .
64.
Moore, C. (1995) The Davidian Massacre: Disturbing Questions about Waco which Must Be Answered. Franklin , TN: Legacy Communications and Gun Owners Foundation .
65.
Morris, G.H. , White, C.H. and Iltis, R. (1994) `“ Well, Ordinarily I Would, But”: Reexamining the Nature of Accounts for Problematic Events' , Research on Language and Social Interaction27: 123—44 .
66.
Naughton, J. (1996) `Discursively Managing Evaluation and Acceptance at a Hospice Team Meeting: A Dilemma', Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder .
67.
Newport, K.G.C. (2006) The Branch Davidians ofWaco : The History and Beliefis of an Apocalyptic Sect. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
68.
Nyerges, J. (1993) `The Ten Commandments for a Negotiator', in J.W. Breslin and J.Z. Rubin (eds) Negotiation Theory and Practice, pp. 187—96. Cambridge, MA: The Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School .
69.
Pearce, W.B. and Littlejohn, S.W. (1997) Moral Confilict: When Social Worlds Collide. Thousand Oaks , CA : SAGE .
70.
Pierson, T. (1980) ` An Approach to Barricaded Subjects' , Law and Order28: 40—2 .
71.
Pitts, W.L. (1995) `Davidians and Branch Davidians: 1929—1987 ', in S.A. Wright (ed.) Armageddon in Waco: Critical Perspectives on the Branch Davidian Confilict , pp. 43—72. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
72.
Pomerantz, A. (1984) `Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes', in M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
73.
Psathas, G. (1995) Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction . Thousand Oaks , CA : SAGE .
74.
Putnam, L.L. and Holmer, M. (1992) ` Framing, Reframing, and Issue Development ', in L.L. Putnam and M.E. Roloff (eds) Communication and Negotiation, pp. 128—55 . Newbury Park , CA : SAGE .
75.
Putnam, L.L. and Wondelleck, J.M. (2003) `Intractability: Definitions, Dimensions, and Distinctions', in R.J. Lewicki , B. Gray and M. Elliott (eds) Making Sense of Intractable Environmental Confilicts: Concepts and Cases, pp. 35—59. Washington, DC: Island Press .
76.
Reavis, D.J. (1995) The Ashes ofWaco : An Investigation. New York: Simon and Schuster .
77.
Robertson, J.J. (1996) Beyond the Flames: The Trials of the Branch Davidian . San Diego, CA: ProMotion .
78.
Rogan, R.G. (1997) `Emotion and Emotional Expression in Crisis Negotiation ', in R.G. Rogan , M.R. Hammer and C.R. van Zandt (eds) Dynamic Processes of Crisis Negotiation: Theory, Research, and Practice, pp. 25—44. Westport, CT: Praeger .
79.
Rogan, R.G. (1999) `F.I.R.E.: A Communication-Based Approach for Understanding Crisis Negotiation', in O. Adang and E. Giebels (eds) To Save Lives: Proceedings of the First European Confierence on Hostage Negotiations, pp. 29—46. Apeldorn , The Netherlands: Elsevier Science .
80.
Rogan, R.G. and Hammer, M.R. (1994) ` Crisis Negotiations: A Preliminary Investigation of Facework in Naturalistic Conflict Discourse', Journal of AppliedCommunication Research22: 216—31 .
81.
Rogan, R.G. and Hammer, M.R. (2002) `Crisis/Hostage Negotiations: A Communication-Based Approach', in H. Giles (ed.) Law Enforcement, Communication, and Community, pp. 230—54. Amsterdam: Benjamins .
82.
Rogan, R.G. and Hammer, M.R. (2006) ` The Emerging Field of Crisis/Hostage Negotiation: A Communication-Based Perspective ', in J.G. Oetzel and S. Ting-Toomey (eds) The Sage Handbook of Confilict Communication: Integrating Theory , Research, and Practice, pp. 451—78 . Thousand Oaks, CA : SAGE .
83.
Romer, D. , Jamison, P. and Ahern, R.K. (2001) ` The Catch-22 of Smoking and Quitting ', in P. Slovic (ed.) Smoking: Risk, Perception, andPolicy, pp. 216—26 . Thousand Oaks, CA : SAGE .
84.
Ross, R.N. (1975) ` Ellipsis and the Structure of Expectation', San Jose State OccasionalPapers in Linguistics1: 183—91 .
85.
Rule, W.R. (1998) ` Unsqueezing the Soul: Expanding Choices by Reframing and Redirecting Boredom', Journal of ContemporaryPsychotherapy28: 327—36 .
86.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation, Vol. 2. Oxford: Blackwell .
87.
Sarna, P. (1997) `Models for Managing Hostage Negotiations: Pathways or Straight-jackets?', in R.G. Rogan , M.R. Hammer and C.R. van Zandt (eds) Dynamic Processes of Crisis Negotiation: Theory, Research, and Practice, pp. 95—104. Westport, CT: Praeger .
88.
Schon, D.A. and Rein, M. (1995) Frame Refilection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books .
89.
Soo-Hoo, T. (1998) ` Applying Frame of Reference and Reframing Techniques to Improve School Consultation in Multicultural Settings' , Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation9: 325—45 .
90.
Spangle, M.L. and Isenhart, M.W. (2003) Negotiation: Communication for Diverse Settings . Thousand Oaks , CA: SAGE .
91.
Tabor, J.D. and Gallagher, E.V. (1995) Why Waco? Cults and the Battle for Religious Freedom in America. Berkeley: University of California Press .
92.
Tannen, D. (1993) `What's in a Frame? Surface Evidence for Underlying Expectations', in D. Tannen (ed.) Framing in Discourse, pp. 14—56. New York: Oxford University Press .
93.
Taylor, P.J. (2002) ` A Cylindrical Model of Communication Behavior in Crisis Negotiations ', Human Communication Research28: 7—48 .
94.
Taylor, P.J. and Donald, I. (2004) ` The Structure of Communication Behavior in Simulated and Actual Crisis Negotiations' , Human Communication Research30: 443—78 .
95.
Tracy, K. (1995) ` Action-Implicative Discourse Analysis', Journal ofLanguage and Social Psychology14: 195—215 .
96.
Tracy, K. (1997) ` Interactional Trouble in Emergency Service Requests: A Problem of Frames' , Research on Language and Social Interaction30: 315—43 .
97.
Tracy, K. (2005) `Reconstructing Communicative Practices: Action-Implicative Discourse Analysis', in K.L. Fitch and R.E. Sanders (eds) Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, pp. 301—22. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
98.
Tracy, K. and Anderson, D.L. (1999) ` Relational Positioning Strategies in Police Calls: A Dilemma ', Discourse Studies1: 201—25 .
99.
Tracy, K. and Ashcraft, C. (2001) ` Crafting Policies about Controversial Values: How Wording Disputes Manage a Group Dilemma', Journal of AppliedCommunication Research29: 297—316 .
100.
Tracy, K. and Muller, H.L. (2000) ` Diagnosing a School Board's Interactional Trouble: Theorizing Problem Formulating ', Communication Theory11: 84—104 .
101.
Tracy, K. and Tracy, S.J. (1998) ` Rudeness at 911: Reconceptualizing Face and Face Attack ', Human Communication Research25: 225—51 .
102.
Ury, W. ( 1991) Getting Past No: Negotiating with Difi fiicult People . New York: Bantam Books .
103.
US Department of Justice (1993a) Evaluation of the Handling of the Branch Davidian Stand-offi in Waco, Texas (Publication No. ISBN 0—16—042975—7). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office .
104.
US Department of Justice (1993b) Lessons of Waco: Proposed Changes in Federal Law Enforcement (Publication No. ISBN 0—16—042976—5). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office .
105.
US Department of Justice (1993c) Recommendations of Experts for Improvements in Federal Law Enforcement Afiter Waco (Publication No. ISBN 0—16—042974—9). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office .
106.
US Department of Justice (1993d) Report to the Deputy Attorney General on the Events at Waco, Texas: February 28 to April 19, 1993 (Publication No. ISBN 0—16—042973—0). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office .
107.
US Department of the Treasury (1993) Report of the Department of the Treasury on the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms Investigation of Vernon Wayne Howell Also Known as David Koresh (Publication No. ISBN 0—16—0420253). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office .
108.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1993) ` Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis' , Discourse & Society4: 249—83 .
109.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1997) `Discourse as Interaction in Society', in T.A. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Vol. 2, pp. 1—37. London : SAGE .
110.
Walker, M.A. and Harris, G.L. (1995) Negotiations: Sex Steps to Success. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall .
111.
Watanabe, S. (1993) `Cultural Differences in Framing: American and Japanese Group Discussions', in D. Tannen (ed.) Framing in Discourse, pp. 176—209. New York: Oxford University Press .
112.
Watzlawick, P. , Weakland, J. and Fisch, R. (1974) Change: Principles of Problems Formation and Problem Resolution. New York: W.W. Norton .
113.
Weber, M. (1964) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (A.M. Henderson and T. Parsons, trans.). New York: Free Press .
114.
Williams, R.H. (1995) `Breaching the “Wall of Separation”', in S.A. Wright (ed.) Armageddon in Waco: Critical Perspectives on the Branch Davidians, pp. 299—322. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
115.
Womack, D.F. and Walsh, K. (1997) `A Three-Dimensional Model of Relationship Development in Hostage Negotiations', in R.G. Rogan , M.R. Hammer and C.R. van Zandt (eds) Dynamic Processes of Crisis Negotiation: Theory, Research, and Practice, pp. 57—76. Westport, CT: Praeger .
116.
Wright, S.A. (1994) `Misguided Tactics Contributed to the Apocalypse in Waco', in J.R. Lewis (ed.) From the Ashes: Making Sense ofWaco , pp. 95—8. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield .
117.
Wright, S.A. (1995) `Construction and Escalation of a Cult Threat: Dissecting Moral Panic and Official Reaction to the Branch Davidians', in S.A. Wright (ed.) Armageddon in Waco: Critical Perspectives on the Branch Davidians, pp. 75—94. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
