I analyze the construction of co-membership in a high-stakes gatekeeping encounter: US permanent residency (or `green card') interviews. Co-membership is sometimes attempted (intentionally or not) by visa applicants in this critical face-to-face encounter in order to create rapport and a favorable outcome. I show how co-membership is formed or avoided through the following steps: (i) an aspect of social identity is foregrounded through small talk and/or nonverbal means; (ii) the aspect is acknowledged as shared by the interactants and therefore a potential basis for co-membership; and (iii) the attempt at co-membership is ratified, not ratified, or actively refuted by one or all of the interactants. Excerpts are drawn from videotaped visa interviews and audiotaped playback sessions with one US immigration officer and 51 visa applicants. I examine cases in which the officer ratifies, does not ratify and refutes co-membership, and how this affects the interview tone and outcome for the applicant.
Auer, P., Couper-Kuhlen, E. and Mueller, F. (1999) Language in Time: The Rhythm and Tempo of Spoken Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Blommaert, J. (2001) `Investigating Narrative Inequality: African Asylum Seekers' Stories in Belgium', Discourse & Society12(4): 413—49.
3.
Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice (R. Nice, trans)Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Bourdieu, P. (1990) The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
Duranti, A. (1997) Linguistic Anthropology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Erickson, F. (1975) `Gatekeeping and the Melting Pot: Interaction in Counseling Encounters', Harvard Educational Review45(1): 44—70.
7.
Erickson, F. (1976) `Gatekeeping Encounters: A Social Selection Process ', in P.R. Sanday (ed.) Anthropology and the Public Interest: Fieldwork and Theory, pp. 111—45. New York: Academic Press.
8.
Erickson, F. and Shultz, J. (1982) The Counselor as Gatekeeper: Social Interaction in Interviews. New York: Academic Press.
9.
Gilboy, J.A. (1991) `Deciding Who Gets In: Decisionmaking by Immigration Inspectors', Law and Society Review25(3): 571—99.
10.
Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor.
11.
Goffman, E. (1974) Frame Analysis. New York: Harper and Row.
12.
Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press.
13.
Gumperz, J. (1977) Discourse Strategies. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
14.
Gumperz, J. (1992) `Contextualization Revisited', in P. Auer and A. di Luzio (eds) The Contextualization of Language, pp. 39—54. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
15.
Johnston, A.M. (2003) `A Mediated Discourse Analysis of Immigration Gatekeeping Interviews', PhD dissertation, Department of Linguistics , Georgetown University.
16.
Kachru, B.B. (1982) `South Asian English', in R.W. Bailey and M. Goerlach (eds) English as a World Language, pp. 353—83. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press
17.
Kachru, B.B. (1983) The Indianization of English: The English Language in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
18.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Lipsky, M. (1980) Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
20.
Maryns, K. (2006) The Asylum Speaker: Language in the Belgian Asylum Procedure. Manchester: St. Jerome .
21.
Nafziger, J.A.R. (1991) `Review of Visa Denials by Consular Officers', Washington Law Review66(1): 1—105.
22.
Olaniran, B.A. and Williams, D.E. (1995) `Communication Distortion: An Intercultural Lesson from the Visa Application Process', Communication Quarterly43(2): 225—40.
23.
Ruesch, J. and Bateson, G. (1968) Communication: The Social Matrix of Psychiatry . New York: Norton.
24.
Scollon, R. (1981) Human Knowledge and the Institution's Knowledge. Final Report on National Institute of Education Grant No. G-80—0185: Communication Patterns and Retention in a Public University. Fairbanks: Center for Cross-Cultural Studies, University of Alaska.
25.
Scollon, R. (1998) Mediated Discourse as Social Interaction: A Study of News Discourse. New York: Longman .
26.
Scollon, R. (1999) `Mediated Discourse and Social Interaction', Research on Language and Social Interaction32(1/2): 149—54.
27.
Scollon, R. (2001a) Mediated Discourse: The Nexus of Practice. New York: Routledge.
28.
Scollon, R. (2001b) `Action and Text: Toward an Integrated Understanding of the Place of Text in Social (Inter)action', in R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds) Methods in Critical DiscourseAnalysis, pp. 139—83. London: SAGE.
29.
Scollon, R. (2002) `Intercultural Communication as Nexus Analysis ', Logos and Language: Journal of General Linguistics and Language Theory3(2): 1—17.
30.
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. (1981) Narrative, Literacy and Face in Interethnic Communication . Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
31.
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S.W. (2003) Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World . London: Routledge.
32.
Tannen, D. (1984) Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk Among Friends . Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
33.
Tannen, D. (1989) Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Tannen, D. (ed.) (1993) Framing in Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2004) `Ten Reasons Why Linguists Should Pay Attention to Visual Communication', in P. LeVine and R. Scollon (eds) Discourse and Technology: Multimodal Discourse Analysis, pp. 7—19. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
36.
Wertsch, J.V. (1991) Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
Wertsch, J.V. (1998) Mind as Action. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
Winn, M. (2005) `Collecting Target Discourse: The Case of the US Naturalization Interview', in M.H. Long (ed.) Second Language Needs Analysis, pp. 265—304. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
