Substantial cross-national differences in poverty alleviation are well documented. But the extent to which different parts of the social transfer system account for this variation is still relatively unexamined. This paper analyses the redistributive effects of specific social policy institutions in a comparative perspective. The main question is to what extent non-means-tested entitlements and means-tested benefits reduce relative economic poverty in different institutional settings. It is shown that the structure of non-means-tested benefits is more important than that of meanstested benefits in explaining differences in poverty alleviation across countries. The paper also presents a new method for estimating the anti-poverty effects of separate parts of the social transfer system. This method decomposes the anti-poverty effects of a set of social transfers into independent and combined effects, which produces more valid results than prevalent methods used to assess the impact of a particular transfer on poverty. The countries included in this study are Canada, Germany, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States. The empirical analyses are based on data from the Social Citizenship Indicators Programme (SCIP) and Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) describing the situation in the mid-1990s.
Aaberge, R. and Aslaksen, J. (1996) ‘Decomposition of the Gini Coefficient by Income Components: Various Types of Applications and Interpretations’, Discussion Papers 182. Research Department of Statistics Norway.
2.
Atkinson, A. B. , Rainwater, L. and Smeeding, T. (1995) Income Distribution in OECD Countries: Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study. Paris: OECD .
3.
Bäckman, O. (1998) Longitudinal Studies on Sickness Absence in Sweden. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research .
4.
Barry, B. (1990) ‘The Welfare State Versus the Relief of Poverty’, in A. Ware and R. E. Goodin (eds) Needs and Welfare, pp. 73-103. London: Sage .
5.
BÂvner, P. (2001) Half Full or Half Empty? Part-time Work and Well-being Among Swedish Women. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research .
6.
Beckerman, W. (1979a) ‘The Impact of Income Maintenance Payments on Poverty in Britain, 1975’ , The Economic Journal89: 261-279 .
7.
Beckerman, W. (1979b) The Impact of Income Maintenance Programmes on Poverty in Four Developed Countries. Geneva: International Labour Organisation .
8.
Behrendt, C. (2000a) ‘Do Means-tested Benefits Alleviate Poverty? Evidence on Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom from the Luxembourg Income Study’ , Journal of European Social Policy10 (1): 23-42 .
9.
Behrendt, C. (2000b) ‘A Safeguard Against Poverty? An Analysis of the Effectiveness of Social Assistance Schemes in Alleviating Poverty in Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom Based on LIS Data’, doctoral dissertation, University of Konstanz.
10.
Besley, T. (1990) ‘Means Testing Versus Universal Provisions in Poverty Alleviation Programmes’ , Economica57 (225): 119-129 .
11.
Bradshaw, J. and Finch, N. (2002) A Comparison of Child Benefit Packages in 22 Countries. Huddersfield: Department for Work and Pensions .
12.
Bradshaw, J. , Ditch, J. , Holmes, H. and Whiteford, P. (1993) ‘Support for Children: a Comparison of Arrangements in Fifteen Countries’ (Report to the Department of Social Security). University of York .
13.
Carroll, E. (1999) Emergence and Structuring of Social Insurance Institutions. Comparative Studies on Social Policy and Unemployment Insurance. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research .
14.
Castles, F. G. (1997) ‘The Institutional Design of the Australian Welfare State’ . International Social Security Review50 (2): 25-41 .
15.
Creedy, J. (1996) ‘Comparing Tax and Transfer Systems: Poverty, Inequality and Target Efficiency’ , Economica63: 163-174 .
16.
Danziger, S. and Jäntti, M. (1992) ‘Does the Welfare State Work? Evidence on Antipoverty Effects from the Luxembourg Income Study’, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper, No. 74.
17.
Danziger, S. and Jäntti, M. (2000) ‘Income Poverty in Advanced Countries’, in A. B. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon (eds) Handbook on Income Distribution. Amsterdam: Elsevier .
18.
Deleeck, H. , Van den Bosch, K. , and De Lathouwer, L. (1992) Poverty and the Adequacy of Social Security in the EC. A Comparative Analysis. Aldershot: Avebury .
19.
Eardley, T.Bradshaw, J.Ditch, J.Gough, I. and Whiteford, P. (1996) Social Assistance in OECD Countries: Synthesis Report. London: HMSO Books .
20.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press .
21.
Ferrarini, T. (2003) ‘Parental Leave Institutions in Eighteen Post-war Welfare States’, Dissertation Series, No. 58. Thesis. Stockholm University: Swedish Institute for Social Research.
22.
Ferrarini, T. and Nelson, K. (2002) ‘Estimating Posttax Social Insurance Benefits: Validity Problems in Comparative Analyses of Net Income Components from Household Income Data’, Working Paper No. 6. Stockholm University: Swedish Institute for Social Research.
23.
Forma, P. (1996) ‘Interests, Institutions and the Welfare State. Studies on Public Opinion Towards the Welfare State’, Research report No. 102. University of Turku: Stakes.
24.
Förster, M. (1993) ‘Comparing Poverty in 13 OECD Countries: Traditional and Synthetic Approaches’, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper No. 100.
25.
Haataja, A. (1999) ‘Unemployment, Employment and Social Exclusion’, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper No. 195.
26.
Hölsch, K. and Kraus, M. (2002) ‘European Schemes of Social Assistance: an Empirical Analysis of Setups and Distributive Impacts’, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper No. 312.
27.
Jeandidier, B. and Albiser, E. (1999) ‘To What Extent do Family Policy and Social Assistance Transfers Reduce the Frequency and Intensity of Child Poverty? A Comparison Between France, the US and Luxembourg’, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper No. 255.
28.
Kangas, O. (1991) ‘The Politics of Social Rights. Studies on the Dimensions of Sickness Insurance in OECD Countries’, Doctoral Dissertation Series No. 19. Thesis. Stockholm University: Swedish Institute for Social Research.
29.
Kangas, O. (1995) ‘Attitudes to Means-tested Social Benefits in Finland’ , Acta Sociologica38: 299-310 .
30.
Kangas, O. (2000) ‘From Workmen’s Compensation to Working Women’s Insurance: Institutional Development of Work Accident Insurance in OECD Countries’, ZeS-Arbeitspapier No. 10/2000. University of Bremen: Centre for Social Policy Research .
31.
Kangas, O. and Forma, P. (1999) ‘Need, Citizenship or Merit?’, in S. Svallfors and P. Taylor-Gooby (eds) The End of the Welfare State? Responses to State Retrenchment. London: Routledge&Kegan Paul .
32.
Kangas, O. and Palme, J. (1993) ‘Eroding Statism? Labour Market Benefits and the Challenges to the Scandinavian Welfare States’, in E. J. Hansen , S. Ringen , H. Uusitalo and R. Erkson (eds) Scandinavian Welfare Trends. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe .
33.
Kangas, O. and Ritakallio, V-M. (1998) ‘Social Policy or Structure? Income Transfers, Socio-demographic Factors and Poverty in the Nordic Countries and in France’, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper No. 190.
34.
Kemp, P. (1997) A Comparative Study of Housing Allowances. London: The Stationery Office .
35.
Korpi, W. (1980) ‘Approaches to the Study of Poverty in the United States. Critical Notes from a European Perspective’, in V. T. Covello (ed.) Poverty and Public Policy. Boston, MA: Schenken .
36.
Korpi, W. (1983) The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge .
37.
Korpi, W. (1985) ‘Power Resources vs. Action and Conflict: on Causal and Intentional Explanations in the Study of Power’ , Sociological Theory3: 31-45 .
38.
Korpi, W. (1989) ‘Power, Politics, and State Autonomy in the Development of Social Citizenship: Social Rights During Sickness in Eighteen OECD Countries Since 1930’ , American Sociological Review54 (3): 309-328 .
39.
Korpi, W. (1995) Arbetslöshet och arbetslöshetsfärsäkring I Sverige. En studie bland arbetslöshetskassornas medlemmar. Stockholm: Arbetsmarknadsdepartementet .
40.
Korpi, W. (2001) ‘Contentious Institutions. An Augmented Rational-action Analysis of the Origins and Path Dependency of Welfare State Institutions in Western Countries’ , Rationality and Society13 (2): 235-283 .
41.
Korpi, W. and Palme, J. (1998) ‘The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare Institutions, Inequality and Poverty in the Western Countries’ , American Sociological Review63: 661-687 .
42.
Lee, D. R. (1987) ‘The Trade-off Between Equality and Efficiency: Short-run Politics and Long-run Realities’ , Public Choice53: 149-165 .
43.
Le Grand, J. (1982) The Strategy of Equality. Redistribution and the Social Services. London. George Allen & Unwin .
44.
Leisering, L. and Leibfried, S. (1999) Time and Poverty in Western Welfare States. United Germany in Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
45.
Lerman, R. and Townsend, A. A. (1974) ‘Conflicting Objectives in Income Maintenance Programs’ , The American Economic Review64 (2): 205-211 .
46.
Lerman, R. I. and Yitzhaki, S. (1985) ‘Income Inequality Effects by Income Source: a New Approach and Applications to the United States’ , Review of Economics and Statistics67: 151-156 .
47.
Mitchell, D. (1991) Income Transfers in Ten Welfare States. Aldershot: Avebury .
48.
Myles, J. (1989) Old Age in the Welfare State: the Political Economy of Public Pensions, revised edn.Lawrence: University Press of Canada .
49.
Nelson, K. (2003) ‘Fighting Poverty. Comparative Studies on Social Insurance, Means-tested Benefits and Income Redistribution’, Dissertation Series No. 60. Stockholm University: Swedish Institute for Social Research.
50.
Palme, J. (1990) Pension Rights in Welfare Capitalism. The Development of Old-age Pensions in 18 OECD Countries 1930 to 1985. Stockholm University: Swedish Institute for Social Research .
51.
Palme, J. (1996) ‘Välfärdsstaten som en strategi för jämlikhet’, in J. Palme and I. Wennemo , Generell välfärd. Hot och möjligheter?Stockholm: Nordstedts .
52.
Palme, J. (1999) The Nordic Model and the Modernisation of Social Protection in Europe. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers .
53.
Palme, J. and Wennemo, I. (1998) Swedish Social Security in the 1990s: Reform and Retrenchment. Stockholm: The Ministry of Health and Social Affairs .
54.
Pedersen, A. W. (1999) ‘The Taming of Inequality in Retirement. A Comparative Study of Pension Policy Outcomes’, Fafo-report 317. Oslo.
55.
Pyatt, G. (1976) ‘The Interpretation and Disaggregation of Gini Coefficients’ , Economic Journal86: 243-255 .
56.
Rainwater, L. (1993) ‘The Social Wage in the Income Package of Working Parents’, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper No. 89.
57.
Rainwater, L. , Rein, M. and Schwarz, J. (1986) Income Packaging in the Welfare State. A Comparative Study of Family Income. New York: Oxford University Press .
58.
Rao, V. M. (1969) ‘Two Decompositions of the Concentration Ratio’ , Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 132: 418-425 . Review63(5): 661-87.
59.
Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
60.
Ringen, S. (1987) The Possibility of Politics: a Study in the Political Economy of the Welfare State. Oxford: Clarendon .
61.
Ritakallio, V-M. (2001) ‘Trends of Poverty and Income Inequality in Cross-national Comparison’. Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper No. 272.
62.
Sainsbury, D. and Morissens, A. (2002) ‘Poverty in Europe in the Mid-1990s: the Effectiveness of Means-tested Benefits’ , Journal of European Social Policy12 (4): 307-328 .
63.
Shorrocks, A. F. (1982) ‘Inequality Decomposition by Factor Components’ , Econometrica50 (1): 193-211 .
64.
Shorrocks, A. F. (1983) ‘The Impact of Income Components on the Distribution of Family Incomes’ , Quarterly Journal of Economics97: 311-326 .
65.
Smeeding, T. (1997) Financial Poverty in Developed Countries: the Evidence from LIS’, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper No. 155.
66.
Smeeding, T. (2002) ‘The LIS/LES Project: Overview and Recent Developments’, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper No. 294.
67.
Svallfors, S. (1989) Vem älskar välfärdsstaten? Lund: Arkiv.
68.
Svallfors, S. (1996) Välfärdsstatens moraliska ekonomi. Välfärsopinionen i 90-talets Sverige. UmeÂ: Borea.
69.
Svallfors, S. (1997) ‘Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: a Comparison of Eight Western Nations’ , European Sociological Review13 (3): 283-304 .
70.
Svallfors, S. (1999) ‘The Middle Class and Welfare State Retrenchment: Attitudes to Swedish Welfare Policies’, in S. Svallfors and P. Taylor-Gooby (eds) The End of the Welfare State?London: Routledge .
71.
Tullock, G. (1983) Economics of Income Redistribution. Amsterdam: Kluwer-Nijhoff .
72.
Väisänen, I. (1992) ‘Conflict and Consensus in Social Policy Developments in 18 OECD Countries’ , European Journal of Political Research23: 307-327 .
73.
Whiteford, P. (1995) ‘The Use of Replacement Rates in International Comparisons of Benefit Systems’ , International Social Security Review48 (2): 3-31 .
74.
Whiteford, P. and Bradshaw, J. (1994) ‘Benefits and Incentives for Lone Parents: a Comparative Analysis’ , International Social Security Review47 (3-4): 69-89 .
