Both the UK and German governments have sought to expand child-care provision. There is some evidence of convergence between the two countries in respect of changes in governance as well, but we suggest that the differences remain more striking. The paper draws on national-level data and local case-studies in both countries. We comment on the nature of the expansion of child care and, briefly, on the degree of commitment to it, before exploring the operation of the mixed economy of child care in each country and the relationship between local and central government. We seek the explanation for the differences we observe in the articulation between these two key modes of governance.
Amna, E. , and Montin, St (eds) (2000) Towards a New Concept of Local Self-government. Oslo: Fagbokforlaget .
2.
BMFSFJ (ed.) (2003) Auf den Anfang kommt es an. Perspektiven zur Weiterentwicklung des Systems der Tageseinrichtungen für Kinder in Deutschland. Weinheim: Beltz.
3.
Bode, I. (2003) ‘The Organisational Evolution of the Childcare Regime in Germany: Issues and Dynamics of a Public-Private Partnership’ , Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics (74) 4: 631-657 .
4.
Bode, I. and Evers, A. (2004) ‘From Institutional Fixation to Entrepreneurial Mobility? The German Third Sector and its Contemporary Challenges’, in A. Evers and J. L. Laville (eds) The Third Sector in Europe, pp. 101-121. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar .
5.
Buhlman, E. (2002) Press release 10/1/02, Berlin.
6.
Cm. 3959 (1998) ‘Meeting the Childcare Challenge: a Framework and Consultation Document’. London: Stationery Office.
7.
DfEE (2001) ‘Early Years Development and Childcare Partnerships: Planning Guidance’. London: DfEE .
8.
DfES (2001) ‘Early Years Development and Childcare Partnerships: Planning Guidance’. London: DfES .
9.
Diller, A. (2002) ‘Der Pisa-Schock: Konzepte und Finanzierungen der Kindertageseinrichtungen auf dem Prüfstand’, Theorie und Praxis der sozialen Arbeit 2: 89-94.
10.
Duncan, S. and Edwards, R. (1999) Lone Mothers, Paid Work and Gendered Moral Rationalities. London: Macmillan .
11.
EC (2003) ‘Scoreboard on Implementing the Social Policy Agenda’, COM (2003) 57 final. Brussels: European Commission .
12.
Engelbrech, G. (2001) ‘Der Arbeitsmarkt für Mütter und Väter - Zwischen Hindernissen und neuen Perspektiven’, Netzwerk für örtliche und regionale Familienpolitik Rundbrief 11: 5-15.
13.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press .
14.
Esping-Andersen, G. (2002) ‘A Child-centred Social Investment Strategy’ and ‘A New Gender Contract’, in G. Esping-Andersen , D. Gallie , A. Hemerijck and J. Myles (eds) Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
15.
Esping-Andersen, G. (2003) ‘Against Social Inheritance’, in A. Giddens (ed.) The Progressive Manifesto, pp. 97-119. Cambridge: Polity .
16.
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (2000) Employment and Working Time in Europe. Dublin: European Foundation .
17.
Evers, A. (ed.) (2004) ‘Eine neue Architektur der Sozialen Sicherung in Deutschland?’, Zeitschrift für Sozialreform 50 (1-2).
18.
Evers, A. and Sachße, C. (2002) ‘Social Care Services for Children and Older People in Germany: Distinct and Separate Histories’, in A. Anttonen , J. Baldock and J. Sippilä (eds) The Young, the Old and the State: Social Care Systems in Five Industrial Nations, pp. 55-80. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar .
19.
Glendinning, C. , Powell, M. and Rummery, K. (eds) (2002) Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare. Bristol: Policy Press .
20.
Hakim, C. (2000) Work-Lifestyle Choices in the Twenty-first Century: Preference Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
21.
Hank, K., Tillmann, K. and Wagner, G. (2001) ‘Außerhäusliche Kinderbetreuung in Ostdeutschland vor und nach der Wiedervereinigung. Ein Vergleich mit Westdeutschland in den Jahren 1990-1999’, Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft (26) 1: 55-65.
22.
HC 564-1 (2003) ‘House of Commons’ Work and Pensions Committee. Childcare for Working Parents. Fifth Report of Session 2002-3’.
23.
Heinze, R. G., Schmid, J. and Strünck, C. (1997) ‘Zur politischen ökonomie der sozialen Dienstleistungsproduktion. Der Wandel der Wohlfahrtsverbände und die Konjunkturen der Theoriebildung’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 49 (2): 242-71.
24.
Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2003) ‘Unraveling the Central State, But How? Types of Multi-level Governance’, Institut für Höhere Studien (IHS) Political Science Series No. 87, Vienna .
25.
Kooiman, J. (1999) ‘Social-Political Governance: Overview, Reflections and Design’ , Public Management1 (1): 67-92 .
26.
Kooiman, J. (2000) ‘Societal Governance: Levels, Models and Orders of Social-Political Interaction’, in J. Pierre (ed.) Debating Governance: Authority, Steering and Democracy, pp. 138-166. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
27.
Kreyenfeld, M., Spieß, K. and Wagner, G. (2002) ‘Kinderbetreuungspolitik in Deutschland - Möglichkeiten nachfrageorientierter Steuerungsund Finanzierungsinstrumente’, Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaften (5) 2: 201-21.
28.
Land, H. and Lewis, J. (1998) ‘Gender, Care and the Changing Role of the State in the UK’, in J. Lewis (ed.) Gender, Social Care and Welfare State Restructuring in Europe, pp. 51-84. Aldershot: Ashgate .
29.
Le Grand, J. and Bartlett, W. (1993) Quasi-markets and Social Policy. Basingstoke: Macmillan .
30.
Lewis, J. (1992) ‘Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes’ , Journal of European Social Policy2 (3): 159-173 .
31.
Lewis, J. (2001) ‘The Decline of the Male Breadwinner Model: the Implications for Work and Care’ , Social Politics8 (2): 152-170 .
32.
Lewis, J. (2002) ‘Gender and Welfare State Change’ , European Societies4 (4): 331-357 .
33.
Lewis, J. (2003) ‘Developing Early Years Childcare in England, 1997-2002: the Choices for (Working) Mothers’ , Social Policy and Administration37 (3): 219-238 .
34.
Lewis, J. and Ostner, I. (1994) ‘Gender and the Evolution of European Social Policies’, ZeS Working Paper No. 4/94. Bremen: Centre for Social Policy Research .
35.
Lewis, J. and Surender, R. (2004) Welfare States and Welfare Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
36.
LH München (1999) ‘Die Entwicklung der Kindergärten in den vegangenen 15 Jahren’, Münchner Statistik 6: 87-90.
37.
Lister, R. (2002) ‘Towards a New Welfare Settlement?’, in C. Hay (ed.) British Politics Today. Cambridge: Polity Press .
38.
Mamier, J. , Pluto, L. , van Santen, E. , Seckinger, M. and Zink, G. (2002) ‘Jugendhilfe und sozialer Wandel’ , DJI-Bulletin59: 4-7 .
39.
Marquand, D. (1998) Must Labour Win?London: Fabian Society .
40.
Meyer, T. (2003) ‘Reasonable Measures for a Sustainable Future? An Analysis of the Expansion of Family Policies in Strong Breadwinner Models. Britain and Germany Compared’ , paper presented at the 2003 ESPAnet Conference (Nov.), Copenhagen.
41.
Moss, P. and Deven, F. (eds) (1999) Parental Leave: Progress or Pitfall?Brussels: NIDI CBGS Publication .
42.
National Audit Office (2004) ‘Early Years. Progress in Developing High Quality Childcare and Early Education Accessible to All’, HC 268. London: Stationery Office .
43.
Newman, J. (2001) Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society. London: Sage .
44.
OECD (2001a) Knowledge and Skills for Life: First Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD .
45.
OECD (2001b) Starting Strong. Early Childhood Education and Care. Paris: OECD .
46.
Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1993) Reinventing Government. New York: Penguin Books .
47.
Paull, G. , Taylor, A and Duncan, A. (2002) Mothers’ Employment and Childcare Use in Britain. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies .
48.
Peters, B. G. (2000) ‘Governance and Comparative Politics’, in J. Pierre (ed.) Debating Governance. Authority, Steering, and Democracy. Oxford: University Press .
49.
Peters, B. G. and Pierre, J. (2001) ‘Developments in Intergovernmental Relations: Towards Multi-level Governance’ , Policy and Politics29 (2): 131-135 .
50.
Pierson, P. (2000a) ‘Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics’ , American Political Science Review92 (4): 251-267 .
51.
Pierson, P. (ed.) (2000b) The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
52.
Powell, M. (1999) (ed.) New Labour, New Welfare State?Bristol: Policy Press .
53.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997) Understanding Governance. Buckingham: Open University Press .
54.
Sachße, C. (1994) ‘Subsidiarität: Zur Kariere eines sozialpolitischen Ordnungsbegriffs’, Zeitschrift für Sozialreform 44 (11): 717-38.
55.
Scharpf, F. W. (2001) ‘Notes towards a Theory of Multilevel Governing in Europe’ , Scandinavian Political Studies24: 1-26 .
56.
Schilling, M. (1997) Die Situation der Beschäftigten in Kindertageseinrichtungen in den neuen Bundesländern und Berlin-Ost Ende 1994. Frankfurt: Gewerkschaft Erziehung und Wissenschaft (GEW).
57.
Sibeon, R. (2000) ‘Governance and the Policy Process in Contemporary Europe’ , Public Management (2) 3: 289-310 .
58.
Spieß, K. and Wagner, G. (1997) ‘Verbesserung der außerhäusigen Kinderbetreuung - geordneter Wettbewerb statt öffentliches Angebot?’, Nachrichtendienst des Deutschen Vereins für öffentliche und private Fürsorge 4: 104-8.
59.
Stadt Frankfurt am Main (2002) Statistisches Jahrbuch Frankfurt/Main. Frankfurt am Main: Stadt Frankfurt.
60.
Statistisches Bundesamt (2001) ‘Fachserie 13. Reihe 6.3.1’. Tageseinrichtungen für Kinder (Erhebungsjahr 1998). Stuttgart: Metzler-Poeschel.
61.
Statistisches Bundesamt (2003) Arbeiten und Leben in Deutschland. Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus 2002. Wiesbaden [http://www.destatis.de/presse/deutsch/pk/2003/Mikrozensus_2002.pdf].
62.
Statistisches Bundesamt (2004) Kindertagesbetreuung in Deutschland 2002. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.
63.
Stoker, G. (2002) ‘Life is a Lottery: New Labour’s Strategy for the Reform of Devolved Governance’ , Public Administration80 (3): 417-434 .
64.
Strategy Unit (2002) ‘The Report of the Inter-Departmental Committee Childcare Review: Delivering for Children and Families’. London: Strategy Unit .
65.
Travers, T. (2001) ‘Local Government’, in A. Seldon (ed.) The Blair Effect. London: Little, Brown and Company .
66.
Trube, A. (2001) ‘Hauptelemente des Neuen Steuerungsmodells’, in K.H. Boeßenecker, A. Trube and N. Wohlfahrt (eds) Verwaltungsreform von unten? Lokaler Sozialstaat im Umbruch aus verschiedenen Perspektiven. Münster: Votum.
67.
Van Kersbergen, K. (1995) Social Capitalism. A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State. London: Routledge .
68.
White, S. (2001) (ed.) New Labour. The Progressive Future?Basingstoke: Palgrave .
69.
Wilsford, D. (1994) ‘Path Dependency, or Why History Makes it Difficult but not Impossible to Reform Health Care Systems in a Big Way’ , Journal of Public Policy14 (3): 251-283 .
70.
Wissenschaftlicher Beirat für Familienfragen (2001) Gerechtigkeit für Familien: Zur Begründung und Weiterentwicklung des Familienlasten- und Familienleistungsausgleichs (Schriftenreihe des Bundesministeriums für Familien, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend 202). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
71.
Woodland, S. , Miller, M. and Tipping, S. (2002) Repeat Study of Parents’ Demand for Childcare. London: DfES .
