This article explores how parents in couple families reconcile employment and child-care, and how far the current emphasis of EU-level policy on enhancing the formal provision of child-care fits with patterns and/or preferences in Western European member states. We use European Social Survey data from 2004—05 on working patterns and preferences, and on child-care use and preferences regarding the amount of formal provision. We find that working hours remain a very important dimension of work/family reconciliation practices, with large differences in both patterns and preferences. There is very little evidence of convergence towards a dual, full-time worker model family outside the Nordic countries, although the balance between the hours which men and women spend in paid work is becoming less unequal. The part that kin (partners and grandparents) play in providing child-care remains important in all but three countries, and, for the most part, mothers report that they are content with the amount of formal child-care available. We suggest that work/family reconciliation measures need to encompass a more extended policy package, the components of which are likely to be specific to member states.
Akerloff, G.A. and Kranton, R.E. (2000) `Economics and Identity', The Quarterly Journal of Economics115 (3): 715—53.
2.
Anxo, D. and Boulin, J-Y. (2006) `The Organisation of Time over the Life-course: European Trends', European Societies8 (2): 319—41.
3.
Atkinson, J. (2000) Employment Options and Labour Market Participation . Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
4.
Becker, P.E. and Moen, P. (1999) `Scaling Back: Dualearner Couples' Work—Family Strategies', Journal of Marriage and the Family61 (4): 995—1007.
5.
Bettio, F. and Plantenga, J. (2004) `Comparing Care Regimes in Europe', Feminist Economics10 (1): 85—113.
6.
Bielenski, H., Bosch, G. and Wagner, A. (2002) Working Time Preferences in Sixteen European Countries . Dublin: Eurofound.
7.
Bonoli, G. (2005) `The Politics of the New Social Policies: Providing Coverage against New Social Risks in Mature Welfare States', Policy and Politics33 (3): 431—49.
8.
Crompton, R. (2006) Employment and the Family. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Crompton, R. and Lyonette, C. (2006) `Some Issues in Cross-national Comparative Research Methods: a Comparison of Attitudes to Promotion, and Women's Employment, in Britain and Portugal', Work, Employment and Society20 (2): 389—400.
10.
Daly, M. (2002) `A Fine Balance: Women's Labor Market Participation in International Comparison', in F. W. Scharpf and V. A. Schmidt (eds) Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, Vol. II, pp. 467—510. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
de Henau, J.Meulders, D. and O'Dorchai, S. (2006) `The Childcare Triad? Indicators Assessing Three Fields of Child Policies for Working Mothers in the EU-15', Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis8 (2): 129—48.
12.
EC (2002) Increasing Labour Force Participation and Promoting Active Ageing. COM (2002) 9 final. Brussels: European Commission.
13.
EC (2006) First Stage Consultation of European Social Partners on Reconciliation of Professional, Private and Family Life, SEC(2006)1245. Brussels: European Commission.
14.
Ellingsaeter, A-L. (2006) `The Norwegian Childcare Regime and its Paradoxes ', in A-L. Ellingsaeter and A. Leira (eds) Politicising Parenthood in Scandinavia. Gender Relations in Welfare States. Bristol : Policy Press.
15.
Ellingsaeter, A-L. and Leira, A. (eds) (2006) Politicising Parenthood in Scandinavia. Gender Relations in Welfare States. Bristol : Policy Press.
16.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
17.
Eurofound (2006) Working Time Options over the Life Course: New Work Patterns and Company Strategies. Dublin: Eurofound.
18.
European Social Survey (2005) Round 2. Available at: [http://ess.nsd.uib.no].
19.
Eurostat (2005) Gender Gaps in the Reconciliation between Work and Family Life. Statistics in Focus4/2005. Brussels: Eurostat.
20.
Fagan, C., Grimshaw, D. and Rubery, J. (2006) `The Subordination of the Gender Equality Objective: the National Reform Programmes and “Making Work Pay” Policies ', Industrial Relations Journal37 (6): 571—92.
21.
Fagnani, J. (1998) `Helping Mothers to Combine Paid and Unpaid Work — or Fighting Unemployment? The Ambiguities of French Family Policy', Community, Work and Family1 (3): 297—312.
22.
Fagnani, J. and Letablier, M-T. (2004) `Work and Family Life Balance: the Impact of the 35-hour Laws in France'. Work, Employment and Society18 (3): 551—72.
23.
Finch, N. (2006) `Gender Equity and Time Use: How do Mothers and Fathers Spend their Time?', in J. Bradshaw and A. Hatland (eds) Social Policy, Employment and Family Change in Comparative Perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
24.
Finch, J. and Mason, J. (1993) Negotiating Family Responsibilities. London: Tavistock/Routledge.
25.
Flaquer, L. and Navarro, L. (2005) `Change in Family Structures and Informal Care Work', paper given at the `Hidden Work Regimes' conference (May), Hamburg.
26.
Folbre, N. and Bittman, M. (eds) (2004) Family Time. London and New York : Routledge.
27.
Gershuny, J. and Sullivan, O. (2003) `Time Use, Gender and Public Policy Regimes', Social Politics10 (2): 205—28.
28.
Gornick, J. and Heron, A. (2006) `The Regulation of Working Time as Work—Family Reconciliation Policy: Comparing Europe, Japan, and the United States', Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis8 (2): 149—66.
29.
Gornick, J. and Meyers, M. (2003) Families that Work. Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment. New York: Russell Sage.
30.
Haas, B., Steiber, N., Hartel, M. and Wallace, C. (2006) `Household Employment Patterns in an Enlarged European Union', Work, Employment and Society20 (4): 751—71.
31.
Hakim, C. (2000) Work—Lifestyle Choices in the Twenty-first Century: Preference Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
Himmelweit, S. (2005) `The Determinants of Caring Behaviour', Full Report of Research Activities and Results. Swindon: ESRC.
33.
Himmelweit, S. and Sigala, M. (2004) `Choice and the Relationship between Identities and Behaviour for Mothers with Pre-school Children: Some Implications for Policy from a UK Study', Journal of Social Policy33 (3): 455—78.
34.
Hobson, B. (2004) `The Individualised Worker, the Gender Participation and the Gender Equity Models in Sweden', Social Policy and Society3 (1): 75—83.
35.
Hobson, B., Duvander, A-Z. and Hallden, K. (2006) `Men and Women's Agency and Capabilities to Create a Worklife Balance in Diverse and Changing Institutional Contexts', in J. Lewis (ed.) Children, Changing Families and Welfare States. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
36.
Jacobs, J.A. and Gerson, K. (2004) The Time Divide. Work, Family and Gender Inequality . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
Knijn, T. and Ostner, I. (forthcoming) `The “Meaning” of Children in Dutch and German Family Policy', in A. Leira and C. Saraceno (eds) Comparative Social Research2008.
38.
Kok, W. (2004) `Report from the High Level Group'. Luxembourg: OOPEC.
39.
Kremer, M. (2006) `How Welfare States Care: Culture, Gender and Citizenship in Europe', unpublished PhD thesis, University of Utrecht .
40.
Lavalle, I., Arthur, S., Millward, C., Scott, J. and Clayden, M. (2002) Happy Families? Atypical Work and its Influence on Family Life. Bristol: Policy Press.
41.
Leitner, A. and Wroblewski, A. (2006) `Welfare States and Work—Life Balance', European Societies8 (2): 295—317.
42.
Lewis, J. (2001) `The Decline of the Male Breadwinner Model: the Implications for Work and Care', Social Politics8 (2): 152—70.
43.
Lewis, J. (2002) `Gender and Welfare State Change', European Societies4 (4): 331—57.
44.
Lewis, J. (2006) `Employment and Care: the Policy Problem, Gender Equality and the Issue of Choice', Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis8 (2): 103—14.
45.
Lewis, J. (2007) `Families, Individuals and the State', in J. Hills, J. Le Grand and D. Piachaud (eds) Making Policy Work. Bristol: Policy Press.
46.
MacInnes, J. (2006) `Work—Life Balance in Europe: a Response to the Baby Bust or Reward for the Baby Boomers?' European Societies8 (2): 223—49.
47.
McRae, S. (2003) `Constraints and Choices in Mothers' Employment Careers: a Consideration of Hakim's Preference Theory', British Journal of Sociology54 (3): 317—38.
48.
Messenger, J. C. (ed.) (2004) Working Time and Workers' Preferences in Industrialized Countries. Finding the Balance. London: Routledge.
49.
Moss, P. and O'Brien, M. (eds) (2006) International Review of Leave Policies and Related Research, Employment Relations Research Series No. 57. London: Department of Trade and Industry.
50.
Oecd (2001) Employment Outlook . Paris: OECD.
51.
Oecd (2004) Employment Outlook . Paris: OECD.
52.
Oecd (2005) Employment Outlook . Paris: OECD.
53.
Pfau-Effinger, B. (2004) `Welfare State Policies and the Development of Care Arrangements', European Societies7 (2): 321—47.
54.
Plantenga, J. and Remery, C. (2005) Reconciliation of Work and Private Life: a Comparative Review of Thirty European Countries. Brussels: European Communities.
55.
Schmid, G. (1998) Transitional Labour Markets: a New European Employment Strategy, WZB Discussion Paper FS 1 98—206. Berlin : WZB.
56.
Strohmeier, K.P. (2002) `Family Policy — How does it Work?', in F-X. Kaufman, A. Kuijsten, H-J. Schulze and K. P. Strohmeier (eds) Family Life and Family Policies in Europe, Vol 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57.
Vasblom, J.D. and Schippers, J. (2006) `Changing Dynamics in Female Employment around Childbirth: Evidence from Germany, the Netherlands and the UK', Work, Employment and Society20 (2): 329—47.
58.
Visser, J. (2002) `The First Part-time Economy in the World: a Model to be Followed?' Journal of European Social Policy12 (1): 23—42.
59.
Wallace, C. (2002) `Household Strategies: their Conceptual Relevance and Analytical Scope in Social Research', Sociology36 (2): 275—92.
60.
Warren, T. (2003) `Class- and Gender-based Working Time? Time Poverty and the Division of Domestic Labour', Sociology37 (4): 733—52.
61.
Wheelock, J., Oughton, E. and Barris, S. (2003) `Getting by with a Little Help from your Family: Towards a Policy-relevant Model of the Household', Feminist Economics9 (1): 19—45.
