Through the analysis of 22 European countries and Canada, this article seeks to investigate the assumption that political macro level variables such as welfare state systems and immigration regimes shape the conditions encountered by young immigrants and thus have an impact on their school performance. The results show that native students benefit from social-democratic welfare states and immigration-friendly integration regimes, whereas immigrant students underperform under these types of regimes. Thus, while the finding for native students supports the argument found in the body of literature, claiming that social-democratic welfare states lead to a reduction in inequality and to less stratification, the findings for immigrant students suggest that positive discrimination may under some circumstances lead to a counterproductive result. The argument is tested with a multilevel modelling procedure on three levels (student, school and country) based on different data sources.
BantingK.G. (2000) ‘Looking in Three Directions: Migration and the European Welfare State in Comparative Perspective’, in BommesM.GeddesA. (eds) Immigration and Welfare: Challenging the Borders of the Welfare State, pp. 13–33. London: Routledge.
4.
BourdieuP. (1966) ‘L’école conservatrice: Les inegalités devant l’école et devant la culture’, Revue Française de Sociologie7(3): 325–47.
5.
BourdieuP. (1983) ‘Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital’, in KreckelR. (ed.) Soziale Ungleichheiten, pp. 199–220. Göttingen: Verlag Otto Schwarz and Co.
6.
BrubakerR. (2000) ‘Staatsbürgerschaft als soziale Schliessung’, in HolzK. (ed.) Staatsbürgerschaft: Soziale Differenzierung und politische Inklusion, pp. 75–94. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
7.
BrykA.S.RaudenbushS.W. (1992) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
8.
CastlesS.MillerM.J. (2003) The Age of Migration. Houndsmill/New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
9.
ÇinarD.DavyU.WaldrauchH. (1999) ‘Comparing the Rights of Non-Citizens in Western Europe’, Research Perspectives on Migration2(1): 8–11.
10.
de HeusM.DronkersJ. (2009) ‘Immigrants’ Children Scientific Performance in a Double Comparative Design: The Influence of Origin, Destination, and Community’, Summer 2009 Meeting of the ISA RC28Mobility and Inequality: Intergenerational and Life Course Perspectives. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
11.
de HeusM.DronkersJ.LevelsM. (2009) ‘Immigrant Pupils’ Scientific Performance: The Influence of Educational System Features of Countries of Origin and Destination’. An older version of this paper was presented at the RC28 Spring Meeting 2008, Social Stratification and Insiders/Outsiders: Cross-national Comparisons within and between Continents. Florence, Italy, 15–18 May 2008 and Dutch-Fleming Meeting of Sociology 2008, Leuven, Belgium, 29 May 2008.
12.
DiefenbachH. (2004) ‘Bildungschancen und Bildungs(miss)erfolg von ausländischen Schülern oder Schülern aus Migrantenfamilien im System schulischer Bildung’, in BeckerR.LauterbachW. (eds) Bildung als Privileg? Erklärungen und Befunde zu den Ursachen der Bildungsungleichheit, pp. 225–49. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
13.
DronkersJ.de HeusM. (2010) ‘Negative Selectivity of Europe’s Guest-workers Immigration? The Educational Achievement of Children of Immigrants Compared with the Educational Achievement of Native Children in their Origin Countries’, in de CorteE.FenstadJ.E. (eds) From Information to Knowledge. From Knowledge to Wisdom: Challenges and Changes facing Higher Education in the Digital Age, pp. 89–104. London: Portland Press.
14.
DronkersJ.LevelsM. (2007) ‘Do School Segregation and School Resources Explain the Region-of-Origin Difference in the Mathematics Achievement of Immigrant Students?’, Educational Research and Evaluation13(5): 432–62.
15.
DupriezV.DumayX. (2006) ‘Inequalities in School Systems: Effect of School Structure or of Society Structure?’, Comparative Education42(2): 243–60.
16.
Duru-BellatM.MonsN.SuchautB (2004) ‘Caractéristiques des systèmes éducatifs et compétences des jeunes de 15 ans. L’éclairage des comparaisons entre pays’, Cahiers de l’Iredu, CNRS Université de Bourgogne.
17.
EntorfH.MinoiuN. (2004) ‘What a Difference Immigration Policy Makes: A Comparison of PISA Scores in Europe and Traditional Countries of Immigration’, German Economic Review6(3): 355–76.
18.
Esping-AndersenG. (1993) ‘Post-Industrial Class Structures: An Analytical Framework’, in Esping-AndersenG. (ed.) Changing Classes: Stratification and Mobility in Post Industrial Societies, pp. 7–32. London: Sage Publications.
19.
Esping-AndersenG. (1998) Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
European Values Study Group and World Values Survey Association (1981–2004) European and World Values Surveys Four-wave Integrated Data File, 1981–2004, v.20060423, 2006. Surveys designed and executed by the European Values Study Group and World Values Survey Association. File Producers: ASEP/JDS, Madrid, Spain and Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands. File Distributors: ASEP/JDS and GESIS, Cologne, Germany (accessed November 2010).
22.
FreemanG.P. (1986) ‘Migration and the Political Economy of the Welfare State’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science485: 51–63.
23.
FreemanG.P. (2004) ‘Immigrant Incorporation in Western Democracies’, International Migration Review38(3): 945–69.
24.
FreemanG.P. (2006) ‘National Models, Policy Types, and the Politics of Immigration in Liberal Democracies’, West European Politics29(2): 227–47.
25.
GeisslerR. (2005) ‘Die Metamorphose der Arbeitertochter zum Migrantensohn: Zum Wandel der Chancenstruktur im Bildungssystem nach Schicht, Geschlecht, Ethnie und deren Verknüpfungen’, in BergerP.A.LauterbachW. (eds) Institutionalisierte Ungleichheiten: Wie das Bildungswesen Chancen blockiert, pp. 71–100. Weinheim/München: Juventa.
26.
GomollaM.RadtkeF.-O. (2002) Institutionelle Diskriminierung: Die Herstellung ethnischer Differenz in der Schule. Opladen: Leske and Budrich.
27.
HansenG.WenningN. (2003) Schulpolitik für andere Ethnien in Deutschland. Zwischen Autonomie und Unterdrückung. Münster/New York/München/Berlin: Waxmann.
28.
HolgerS. (2004) ‘“Wer zu spät kommt”: Schulausbildung und der Erwerbseinstieg von Ausbildungsabsolventen ausländischer Herkunft in Deutschland’, in HillmertS.MayerKarl U. (eds) Geboren 1964 und 1971: Neuere Untersuchungen zu Ausbildungs-und Berufschancen in Westdeutschland. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
29.
HuberE.StephensJ.D. (2001) Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
InglehartR.F. (2008) ‘Changing Values among Western Publics form 1970 to 2006’, West European Politics31(1/2): 130–46.
31.
KoganI. (2008) ‘Education Systems of Central and Eastern European Countries’, KoganIrena. (eds) Europe Enlarged: A Handbook of Education, Labour and Welfare Regimes in Central and Eastern Europe, pp. 7–34. Bristol: The Policy Press.
32.
KoopmansR.StathamP.GiugniM.PassyF. (2005) Contested Citizenship: Immigration and Cultural Diversity in Europe. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.
33.
LangerW. (2007) ‘The End of Equal Opportunities? A Multilevel Analysis of the Luxemburg PISA 2003 Data’, ‘Économie et Statistiques’: Working Papers du STATEC17: 1–17.
34.
LevelsM.DronkersJ. (2008) ‘Educational Performance of Native and Immigrant Children from Various Countries of Origin’, Ethnic and Racial Studies31(8): 1404–25.
35.
LevelsM.DronkersJ.KraaykampG. (2008) ‘Immigrant Children’s Educational Achievement in Western Countries: Origin, Destination, and Community Effects on Mathematical Performance’, American Sociological Review73(5): 835–53.
36.
LipsetS.RokkanS. (eds) (1967) Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Crossnational Perspectives. New York: Free Press.
37.
LovenduskiJ. (2001) ‘Women and Politics: Minority Representation or Critical Mass?’, Parliamentary Affairs54: 743–58.
MorissensA.SainsburyD. (2005) ‘Migrants’ Social Rights, Ethnicity and Welfare Regimes’, Journal of Social Policy34(4): 637–60.
40.
NiessenJ.HuddlestonT.CitronL. (2007) Migrant Integration Policy Index. Brüssels: British Council and Immigration Policy Group (available at www.integrationindex.eu).
41.
NoelkeC. (2008) ‘Social Protection, Inequality and Labour Market Risks in Central and Eastern Europe’, in KoganIrena. (eds) Europe Enlarged: A Handbook of Education, Labour and Welfare State Regimes in Central and Eastern Europe, pp. 63–96. Bristol: The Policy Press.
42.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2004) Social Expenditure Database (available at www.oecd.org/els/social/expenditure).
43.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2005a) PISA 2003 Data Analysis Manual. SPSS Users (available at www.oecd.org).
44.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2005b) School Factors Related to Quality and Education: Results from PISA 2000 (available at www.oecd.org/dataoecd/15/20/34668095.pdf).
45.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2006a) PISA 2006 (available at www.oecd.org).
46.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2006b) Where Immigrant Students Succeed: A Comparative Review of Performance and Engagement in PISA 2003 (available at www.oecd.org).
47.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007) PISA 2006 Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World (available at www.oecd.org).
48.
Rabe-HeskethS.SkrondalA. (2008) Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata (second edn). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
49.
SainsburyD. (2006) ‘“Immigrants” Social Rights in Comparative Perspective: Welfare Regimes, Forms of Immigration and Immigration Policy Regimes’, Journal of European Social Policy16(3): 229–44.
50.
SchnepfS.V. (2007) ‘Immigrants’ Educational Disadvantage: An Examination Across Ten Countries and Three Surveys’, Journal of Population Economics20: 527–45.
51.
SnijdersT.A.BerkhofJ. (2008) ‘Diagnostic Checks for Multilevel Models’, in Leeuw deJ.MeijerErik (eds) Handbook of Multilevel Analysis, pp. 139–73. New York: Springer.
52.
SolgaH.WagnerS. (2004) ‘Die Zurückgelassenen: die soziale Verarmung der Lernumwelt von Hauptschülerinnen und Hauptschüler’, in BeckerR.LauterbachW. (eds) Bildung als Privileg? Erklärungen und Befunde zu den Ursachen der Bildungsungleichheit I, pp. 198–224. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: Wiesbaden.
53.
SteenbergenM.R.JonesB.S. (2002) ‘Modeling Multilevel Data Strucutres’, in American Journal of Political Science24(1): 218–37.
54.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and International Bureau of Education (2006–2007) World Data on Education (available at www.ibe.unesco.org/Countries/WDE/2006/index.html).
55.
WaldrauchH. (ed.) (2002) Die Integration von Einwanderern: Ein Index der rechtlichen Diskriminierung. Frankfurt/New York: Campus.
