This article undertakes a first stock-taking of the practice under the Maastricht Social Policy Agreement between the E U member states except the UK. It provides an overview of the rules and experience to date concerning the legal nature, its policy innovations, its corpor atist potentials, and the UK opt-out. The trends can be summarized as normalization, concerning the Agreement's legal character, and as trend continuation, concerning policy competences and majority voting. However, two surprising developments may already be observed: evolving patterns of 'Euro-corpora tism'; and significant effects from and on the UK. This country's opt-out, on the one hand, and the 1996 Intergovernmental Conference, on the other, have so far been considerable factors determining the application of the new powers. Therefore, the policy innovations of the Social Agreement might have much more of an impact in the longer run.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agence Europe (various years) Brussels/Luxembourg, S.A.
2.
Barnard, C. (1992) A social policy for Europe: politicians 1, lawyers 0, The International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations1: 15-32.
3.
Blanpain, R. and Windey, P. (1994) European Works Councils. Information and Consultation of Employees in Multinational Enterprises in Europe, Leuven, Uitgervij Peeters.
4.
Ebbmghaus, B. and Visser, J. (1994) Barneren und Wege 'grenzenloser' Solidaritat: Gewerkschaften und Europaische Integration, in W. Streeck (ed.) Staat und Verbande, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 223-55.
5.
EuroAS (Informationsdienst Europaeisches Arbeits- und Sozialrecht) (monthly information bulletin), ed. Manfred Bobke et al., Neuwied (Germany) , Luchterhand Verlag.
6.
European Industrial Relations Review (various years) London, Andrew Brode.
7.
Falkner, G. (1993a) Sozialpartnerschaftliche Politikmuster und Europaische Integration, in E. Tálos (ed.) Sozialpartnerschaft zwischen Kontinuitat und Wandel, Wien, Verlag fur Gesellschaftskritik, pp. 79-103.
8.
Falkner, G. (1993b) 'Sozialdumping' im EG-Bmnenmarkt : Betrachtungen aus politikwissenschaftlicher Sicht, Osterreichische Zeitschrift fuer Politikwissenschaft3: 261-77.
9.
Falkner, G. and Tálos, E. (1994) The role of the State m social policy, West European Politics2: 52-76.
10.
Gold, M. and Hall, M. (1994) Statutory European Works Councils: the final countdown? , Industrial Relations3: 177-86.
11.
Hailbronner, K. (1994) Das Spannungsverhaltnis zwischen der Sozialpolitik der EG und der Sozialpolitik der Elf nach dem Abkommen uber die Sozialpolitik in W. Hummer (ed.) Die Europaische Union und Osterreich , Wem, Verlag Osterreich, pp. 113-24.
12.
Hall, M. (1994) Industrial relations and the social dimension of European integration: before and after Maastncht, in R. Hyman and A. Ferner (eds) New Frontiers in European Industrial Relations , Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 281-31.
13.
Hall, M., Carley, M., Gold, M., Margmson, O. and Sisson, K. (1995) European Works Councils: Planning for the Directive , Industrial Relations Research Unit (University of Warwick) and Eclipse Group Ltd, London.
14.
Hornung-Draus, R. (1994) Euro-Betriebsräte - Praxistauglichkeit auf den Prufstand, EuroAS12: 4-6.
15.
Obradovich, D. (1995) Prospects for corporatist decision-making in the European Union: the Social Policy Agreement, Journal of European Public Policy2: 261-83.
16.
Schmitter, P. (1981) Interest intermediation and regime governability in contemporary western Europe and North Amenca, in S. Berger (ed.) Organising Interests in Western Europe, Cambridge, Cambndge University Press, pp. 285-327.
17.
Schuster, G. (1992) Rechtsfragen der Maastnchter Vereinbarungen zur Sozialpolitik, Europaische Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftsrecht (Munchen) 6: 178-87.
18.
Séché, J.-C. (1993) L'Europe sociale après Maastricht, Cahiers de Droit Européen29 (5-6): 509-36.
19.
Streeck, W. (1995) Neo-Voluntarism: A New European Social Policy Regime?, European Law Journal1: 31-50.
20.
Streeck, W. and Schmitter, P. (1991) From national corporatism to transnational pluralism: organized interests in the Single European Market, Politics and Society 2: 133-65; also published in W. Streek (ed.) (1992) Social Institutions and Economic Performance, London, Sage (cited pages from this edition).
21.
Traxler, F. and Schmitter, P.C. (1995) The emerging Euro-polity and organised interests , European Journal of International Relations2: 191-218.
22.
Unice (1991) Letter to the Secretary General of the Council of Ministers of the EC, 14 March 1991.
23.
Vogel-Polsky, E. (1994) Maastricht ou la voie ètroite du social, M. Telò (ed.) Quelle union social européenne?Brussels, Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles , pp. 79-96.
24.
Watson, P. (1993) Social policy after Maastricht, Common Market Law Review30: 481-513.
25.
Weiss, M. (1992) The Significance of Maastncht for European Community Social Policy, The International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations1: 3-15.
