Abstract
During its development, titanium was found to be incompatible with conventional dental porcelains due to weak bond strength brought about by titanium's high yet oxidative nature. In spite of the development of new low‐fusing porcelains designed for titanium application, previous studies have shown that sandblasting pre‐treatment prior to porcelain application led to weakening of the metal–ceramic bonding. The aim of this study is to search for an effective alternative to sandblasting for the surface treatment of the titanium substrate in the titanium–porcelain system. The research evaluated the bond strength of 165 samples of titanium–porcelain systems divided into 11 groups. A three‐point flexural bend test was conducted to measure the force required to fracture the porcelain on the titanium substrate. A correlation between the type of surface treatment and the bond strengths of each group was evaluated if it resulted to significant differences.
The study found significantly differences in the energy‐to‐break of titanium–porcelain systems treated with hydrochloric acid and sandblasting compared with the control group. The bonds strength achieved by the titanium–porcelain system when treated with hydrochloric acid is comparable to that of conventional metal–ceramic alloy system. Hydrochloric acid treatment of the titanium substrate is a promising alternative to sandblasting for the surface treatment of the titanium substrate in the titanium–porcelain system.