Billard, S.
(1999) ‘How Q Methodology Can Be Democratized’, Feminism & Psychology9(3): 357-366.
2.
Brittan, A.
(1989) Masculinity and Power. Oxford: Blackwell.
3.
Brown, S.
(1980) Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4.
Buckbinder, D.
(1994) Masculinities and Identity. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
5.
Butler, J.
(1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
6.
Connell, R.
(1987) Gender and Power. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
7.
Edwards, T.
(1997) Men in the Mirror: Men’s Fashion, Masculinity and Consumer Society. London: Cassell.
8.
Febbraro, A.
(1995) ‘On the Epistemology, Metatheory, and Ideology of Q-methodology: A Critical Analysis’, pp. 144-150 in I. Lubek and R. Van Hezwijk (eds) Trends and Issues in Theoretical Psychology.New York: Springer.
9.
Good, G.
, Borst, T. and Wallace, D. (1994) ‘Masculinity Research: A Review and Critique’, Applied & Preventative Psychology3: 3-14.
10.
Hanmer, J.
(1990) ‘Men, Power and the Exploitation of Women’, pp. 21-42 in J. Hearn and D. Morgan (eds) Men, Masculinities, and Social Theory. London: Unwin Hyman.
11.
Hearn, J.
(1998) ‘Theorising Men and Men’s Theories: Varieties of Discursive Practices in Men’s Theorising of Men’, Theory and Society27(6): 781-788.
12.
Horwood, J.
, Gleeson, K. and Waite, J. (1999) ‘Construction of “Other” Men in Media Representations’, paper presented at the British Psychological Society Social Psychology Section Annual Conference, Lancaster University, UK.
13.
Hunter, A.
and Davis, J. (1992) ‘Constructing Gender: An Exploration of Afro-American Men’s Conceptualisation of Manhood’, Gender and Society6(3): 464-479.
14.
Kimmel, M.
(1990) ‘After Fifteen Years: The Impact of Sociology of Masculinity on the Masculinity of Sociology’, pp. 93-123 in J. Hearn and D. Morgan (eds) Men, Masculinity and Social Theory.London: Unwin Hyman.
15.
Kitzinger, C.
(1986) ‘Introducing and Developing Q as a Feminist Methodology: A Study of Accounts of Lesbianism’, pp. 152-172 in S. Wilkinson (ed.) Feminist Social Psychology: Developing Theory and Practice. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
16.
Millward, L.
(1995) ‘Contextualizing Social Identity in Considerations of What it Means to be a Nurse’, European Journal of Social Psychology25: 303-324.
17.
Nixon, S.
(1996) Hard Looks: Masculinities, Spectatorship and Contemporary Consumption. London: UCL Press.
18.
Nolan, J.
(1997) ‘Death of the New Man: Social Representations of Masculinity in Young Men’s Magazines’, BPS Proceedings, December.
19.
Potter, J.
and Wetherell, M. (1987) Discourse and Society. London: Sage.
20.
Saco, D.
(1992) ‘Masculinity as Signs: Poststructuralist Feminist Approach to the Study of Gender’, pp. 23-39 in S. Craig (ed.) Men, Masculinity and the Media: Research on Men and Masculinities. London: Sage.
21.
Senn, C.
(1996) ‘Q-Methodology as Feminist Methodology: Women’s Views and Experience of Pornography’, pp. 201-217 in S. Wilkinson (ed.) Feminist Social Psychologies: International Perspectives.Buckingham: Open University Press.
22.
Snelling, S.
(1996) ‘Perspectives on Feminism: A Q-methodological Investigation’, Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences4: 319-341.
23.
Stainton Rogers, R.
(1995) ‘Q Methodology’, pp. 178-192 in J. Smith, R. Harré and L. Van Langenhove (eds) Rethinking Methods in Psychology. London: Sage.
24.
Stanley, L.
and Wise, S. (1983) Breaking Out: Feminist Consciousness and Feminist Research. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
25.
Stephenson, W.
(1953) The Study of Behaviour: Q-technique and its Methodology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Thomas, A.
(1990) ‘The Significance of Gender Politics in Men’s Accounts of their “Gender Identity”’, pp. 143-159 in J. Hearn and D. Morgan (eds) Men, Masculinities, and Social Theory. London: Unwin Hyman.
27.
Wetherell, M.
and Edley, N. (1999) ‘Negotiating Hegemonic Masculinity’, Feminism & Psychology9(3): 335-356.
28.
Wong T.
and Sun, M. (1998) ‘Dissolution and Reconstruction of National Identity: The Experience of Subjectivity in Taiwan’, Nations and Nationalism4: 247-272.
29.
Woodward, K.
(1997) Identity and Difference. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.