In this article I examine one of the thorniest aspects of the relationship between feminism and postmodernism, in order to see what a discursive analytic approach can contribute to this important debate. The problem I refer to concerns the threat that the postmodern turn-despite its benefits-is said to pose for a politically committed feminism. I begin with a brief recapping of the postmodernist challenge to the tenets of social science. I then advance a two-part argument promoting discourse analysis for feminist scholars who seek to benefit from postmodernism's respect for difference and inclusivity, yet refuse to give up a critical perspective. The first part of the argument deals with the charge that the postmodern turn disables critical inquiry; the second with the related debate over the need for `generalizing' or `totalizing' concepts (e.g. the concept `women') in the service of a feminist politics. I argue that postmodernist scholars' wide-spread tendency to discuss language outside its context of use has hobbled their ability to respond to this serious challenge, and I suggest that a closer look at routine talk can help feminists reframe these debates about politicality in helpful ways.
Alcoff, L. (1988). Cultural feminism versus post-structuralist feminism: The identity crisis in feminist theory. Signs, 13(3), 405-436.
2.
Antaki, C. (1994). Explaining and arguing: The social organization of accounts. London/Thousand Oaks, CA/New Delhi: Sage.
3.
Barrett, M. , & McIntosh, M. (1982). The anti-social family. London: Verso.
4.
Best, S. , & Kellner, D. (1991). Postmodern theory: Critical interrogations. New York: Guilford.
5.
Bologh, R.W. (1992). The promise and failure of ethnomethodology from a feminist perspective: Comment on Rogers. Gender and Society, 6(2), 199-206.
6.
Bordo, S. (1990). Feminism, postmodernism and gender skepticism. In L. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism. London/New York: Routledge.
7.
Brantlinger, P. (1990). Crusoe's footprints: Cultural studies in Britain and America. London/New York: Routledge.
8.
Burman, E. (1991). What discourse is not. Philosophical Psychology, 4(3), 325-342.
9.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble, feminist theory, and psychoanalytic discourse. In L. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism. London/New York: Routledge.
10.
Butler, J. , & Scott, J.W. (Eds.). (1992). Feminists theorize the political. London/New York: Routledge.
Curti, L. (1998). Female stories, female bodies: Narrative, identity and representation. Washington Square: New York University Press.
13.
Darrough, W.D. (1990). Neutralizing resistance: Probation work as rhetoric. In G. Miller & J.A. Holstein (Eds.), Perspectives on social problems. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
14.
Davies, B. (1989). Frogs and snails and feminist tales: Preschool children and gender. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
15.
Diamond, I. , & Quinby, L. (Eds.). (1988). Feminism and Foucault: Reflections on resistance. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
16.
Dumont, C. (1998). The analytical and political utility of poststructuralism: Considering affirmative action. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 23(2-3), 216-237.
17.
Edwards, D. (1995). Sacks and psychology. Theory & Psychology, 5(4), 579-596.
18.
Edwards, D. , Ashmore, M., & Potter, J. (1995). Death and furniture: The rhetoric, politics and theology of bottom line arguments against relativism. History of the Human Sciences, 8(2), 25-49.
19.
Egger, L. , & Stam, H.J. (1999). The discursive production of gender in therapy. Unpublished manuscript, the University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
20.
Flax, J. (1992). The end of innocence. In J. Butler & J.W. Scott (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political. London/New York: Routledge.
21.
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage. (Original work published 1975.)
22.
Fraser, N. (1997). Structuralism or pragmatics: On discourse theory and feminist politics. In Justice interruptus. London/New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1990.)
23.
Fraser, N. , & Nicholson, L. (1990). Social criticism without philosophy. In L. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism. London/New York: Routledge.
24.
Gill, R. (1995). Relativism, reflexivity and politics: Interrogating discourse analysis from a feminist perspective. In S. Wilkinson & C. Kitzinger (Eds.), Feminism and discourse. London/Thousand Oaks, CA/New Delhi: Sage.
25.
Gittins, D. (1986). The family in question: Changing households and familiar ideologies. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
26.
Gubrium, J.F. , & Holstein, J.A. (1997). The new language of qualitative method. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14, 575-599.
28.
Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
29.
Hartsock, N. (1990). Foucault on power: A theory for women? In L. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism. London/New York: Routledge.
30.
Holstein, J.A. (1987). Producing gender effects in involuntary mental hospitalization. Social Problems, 34, 141-155.
31.
Holstein, J.A. , & Gubrium, J.F. (1994). Phenomenology, ethnomethodology and interpretive practice. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.
32.
Holstein, J.A. , & Miller, G. (Eds.). (1993). Reconsidering social constructionism: Debates in social problems theory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
33.
Ibarra, P.R. , & Kitsuse, J.I. (1993). Vernacular constitutuents of moral discourse: An interactionist proposal for the study of social problems. In J. Holstein & G. Miller (Eds.), Reconsidering social constructionism. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
34.
Kitzinger, C. (1987). The social construction of lesbianism. London: Sage.
35.
Lakoff, R.T. (1990). Talking power: The politics of language. New York: Basic Books.
36.
Lipman-Blumen, J. (1984). Gender roles and power. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37.
McHugh, P. , Raffel, S., Foss, D.C., & Blum, A.F. (1974). On the beginning of social inquiry. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
38.
Metcalfe, J.L. (1995). Negotiating collective identity in the Calgary women's movement: A new social movements perspective. Unpublished MA thesis, the University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.
39.
Miller, G. (1991). Enforcing the work ethic: Rhetoric and everyday life in a work incentive program. Albany: State University of New York Press.
40.
Miller, L.J. (1990). Violent families and the rhetoric of harmony. British Journal of Sociology, 41, 263-288.
41.
Miller, L.J. (1993). Claims-making from the underside: Marginalization and social problems analysis. In J. Holstein & G. Miller (Eds.), Reconsidering social constructionism. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
42.
Miller, L.J. , & Metcalfe, J. (1998). Strategically speaking: The problem of essentializing terms in feminist theory and feminist organizational talk. Human Studies, 21, 235-257.
43.
Miller, L.J. , & Penz, O. (1991). Talking bodies: Female bodybuilders colonize a male preserve. Quest, 43, 148-163.
44.
Nicholson, L. (1990). Introduction. In L. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism. London/New York: Routledge.
45.
Nicholson, L. (Ed.). (1990). Feminism/Postmodernism. London/New York: Rout-ledge.
46.
Nicholson, L. (1992). On the postmodern barricades: Feminism, politics, and theory. In S. Seidman & D.G. Wagner (Eds.), Postmodernism and social theory: The debate over general theory. Cambridge, MA/Oxford: Blackwell.
47.
Nicholson, L. (1998). Bringing it all back home: Reason in the twilight of foundationalism. Keynote address, Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society for Women in Philosophy, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
48.
Potter, J. , & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology. London/ Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
49.
Riley, D. (1988). Am I That Name? Feminism and the Category of `Women' in History. London: Macmillan; Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
50.
Rundblad, G. (1993). Politics of anatomy: Women's work roles in early undertaking. American Sociological Association paper.
51.
Schultz, V. (1992). Women `before' the law: Judicial stories about women, work and sex segregation on the job. In J. Butler & J.W. Scott (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political. London/New York: Routledge.
52.
Scott, J.W. (1990). Deconstructing equality-versus-difference: Or, the uses of post-structuralist theory for feminism. In M. Hirsch & E. Fox Keller (Eds.), Conflicts in feminism. London/New York: Routledge.
53.
Seidman, S. (1991). The end of sociological theory: The postmodern hope. Sociological Theory, 9(2), 131-146.
54.
Seidman, S. (1992). Embattled Eros: Sexual politics and ethics in contemporary America. London/New York: Routledge.
55.
Seidman, S. (1994). Contested knowledge: Social theory in the postmodern era. Cambridge, MA/Oxford: Blackwell.
56.
Shotter, J. (1993). Conversational realities: Constructing life through language. London: Sage.
57.
Smith, D.E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
58.
Smith, D.E. (1997). Telling the truth after postmodernism. Symbolic Interaction, 19(3), 171-202.
59.
Spector, M. , & Kitsuse, J.I. (1987). Constructing social problems. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter. (Original work published 1977.)
60.
Squire, C. (1995). Pragmatism, extravagance and feminist discourse analysis. In S. Wilkinson & C. Kitzinger (Eds.), Feminism and discourse. London/Thousand Oaks, CA/New Delhi: Sage.
61.
Stenner, P. , & Marshall, H. (1995). Critical discourse analysis? (D & S Forum), Discourse & Society, 6(4), 568-570.
62.
Tannen, D. (1994). Gender and discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
63.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249-283.
64.
Van Loon, J. (1998). The future is ANT: Theorising bodies in medical practices. In Ampersand (Newsletter of the Theory, Culture and Society Network). Nottingham: The Theory, Culture and Society Centre.
65.
West, C. (1984). Routine complications: Troubles in talk between doctors and patients. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
66.
West, C. , & Zimmerman, D.H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125-151.
67.
Wetherell, M. (1995). Romantic discourse and feminist analysis: Interrogating investment, power and desire. In S. Wilkinson & C. Kitzinger (Eds.), Feminism and discourse. London/Thousand Oaks, CA/New Delhi: Sage.
68.
Widdicombe, S. (1995). Identity, politics and talk: A case for the mundane and the everyday. In S. Wilkinson & C. Kitzinger (Eds.), Feminism and discourse. London/Thousand Oaks, CA/New Delhi: Sage.
69.
Young, I.M. (1996). Gender as seriality: Thinking about women as a collective. In R.E. Joeres & B. Laslett (Eds.), The second SIGNS reader: Feminist scholarship 1983-1996. Chicago, IL/London: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1994.)
