In recent decades social science writing has given renewed attention to the notion of the self in human functioning. One tradition in social science writing has emphasized the importance of sociocultural influences on self-development, and some theorists seem to argue that such factors are primary in understanding the sense of individuality. This paper takes issue with the strong statement of this `social constructionist' view. While it is true that the content of personhood is fashioned in social context and varies across cultures, irreducible processes of individual human psychological agency also contribute to the development and functioning of the person. The universal capacity for `dialectical' thinking is discussed here as one such process. The importance of individual agency is highlighted in an example from a `sociocentrically' organized society. Both social and individual psychological perspectives are necessary to obtain a better grasp of the complexity of individuality.
Chein, I. (1972). The science of behavior and the image of man. New York: Basic Books.
2.
Cooley, C.H. (1983). Human nature and the social order. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. (Original work published 1902.)
3.
Curtis, R.C. (Ed.). (1991). The relational self: Theoretical convergences in psychoanalysis and social psychology. New York: Guilford.
4.
Cushman, P. (1995). Constructing the self constructing America: A cultural history of psychotherapy. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5.
Edelson, M. (1971). The idea of a mental illness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
6.
Gergen, K. (1985). The social constructionist movement in Modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 266-275.
7.
Gergen, K. (1988). If persons are texts. In S. Messer, L. Sass, & R. Woolfolk (Eds.), Hermeneutics and psychological theory (pp. 28-51). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
8.
Gergen, K.J. (1997). The place of the psyche in a constructed world. Theory & Psychology, 7, 723-746.
9.
Harré, R. (Ed.). (1986). The social construction of emotions. Oxford: Blackwell.
10.
Heelas, P. (1981). Introduction: Indigenous psychologies. In P. Heelas & A. Lock (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: The anthropology of the self (pp. 3-18). New York: Academic Press.
11.
Hormuth, S.E. (1991). An ecological perspective on the self-concept. In R. C. Curtis (Ed.), The relational self: Theoretical convergences in psychoanalysis and social psychology (pp. 94-108). New York: Guilford.
12.
Howard, G.S. , & Conway, C.G. (1986). Can there be an empirical science of volitional action?American Psychologist, 41, 1241-1251.
13.
Jenkins, A.H. (1989). The liberating value of constructionism for minorities. The Humanistic Psychologist, 17, 161-168.
14.
Jenkins, A.H. (1995). Psychology and African Americans: A humanistic approach (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
15.
Keen, E. (1970). Three faces of being: Toward an existential clinical psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
16.
Kohut, H. , & Wolf, E.S. (1978). The disorders of the self and their treatment: An outline. International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 59, 413-425.
17.
Landrine, H. (1992). Clinical implications of cultural differences: The referential versus the indexical self. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 401-415.
18.
Lykes, M.B. (1985). Gender and individualistic vs. collectivist bases for notions about the self. Journal of Personality, 53, 356-383.
19.
Markus, H.R. , & Kitayama, S. (1994). The cultural construction of self and emotion: Implications for social behavior. In S. Kitayama & H.R. Markus (Eds.), Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence (pp. 89-130). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
20.
Marsella, A.J. , DeVos, G., & Hsu, F.L.K. (Eds.). (1985). Culture and self: Asian and western perspectives. New York: Tavistock.
21.
Martin, J. , & Sugarman, J. (1999). The psychology of human possibility and constraint. Albany: State University of New York Press.
22.
Maybury-Lewis, D. (1992). Millennium: Tribal wisdom and the Modern world. New York: Viking.
23.
Mead, G.H. (1952). Language and the development of the self. In G.E. Swanson, T.M. Newcomb, & E.L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (rev. ed., pp. 44-54). New York: Holt.
24.
Nobles, W.W. (1973). Psychological research and the black self-concept: A critical review. Journal of Social Issues, 29(1), 11-31.
25.
Ramirez, M. (1998). Multicultural/multiracial psychology: Mestizo perspectives in personality and mental health (2nd ed.). Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
26.
Richardson, F.C. , Fowers, B.J., & Guignon, C.B. (1999). Re-envisioning psychology: Moral dimensions of theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Roland, A. (1991). The self in cross-civilizational perspective: An Indian-Japanese-American comparison. In R.C. Curtis (Ed.), The relational self: Theoretical convergences in psychoanalysis and social psychology (pp. 160-180). New York: Guilford.
28.
Roland, A. (1996). Cultural pluralism and psychoanalysis: The Asian and North American experience. New York: Routledge.
29.
Rychlak, J.F. (1988). The psychology of rigorous humanism (2nd ed.). New York: New York University Press.
30.
Rychlak, J.F. (1994). Logical learning theory: A human teleology and its empirical support. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
31.
Rychlak, J.F. (1997). In defense of human consciousness. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
32.
Sampson, E.E. (1988). The debate on individualism: Indigenous psychologies of the individual and their role in personal and social functioning. American Psychologist, 43, 15-22.
33.
Sampson, E.E. (1989). The challenge of social change for psychology: Globalization and psychology's theory of the person. American Psychologist, 44, 914-921.
34.
Schafer, R. (1976). A new language for psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35.
Shotter, J. (1993). Conversational realities: Constructing life through language. London: Sage.
36.
Shweder, R. (1996). Cultural psychology: What is it? In N. Goldberger & J. Veroff (Eds.), Culture and psychology (pp. 41-86). New York: New York University Press.
37.
Tu Wei-ming . (1985). Selfhood and otherness in Confucian thought. In A.J. Marsella, G. DeVos, & F.L.K. Hsu (Eds.). Culture and self: Asian and western perspectives (pp. 231-251). New York: Tavistock.
38.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
