Based on the premise that a psychology of theatre acting can teach psychologists about social acting, I evaluate Goffman’s influential dramaturgical metaphor and discuss what theatre acting reveals about conceptions of the self. Within Goffman’s model, differences between the quotidian and theatre worlds are accidental and daily life is like theatre actors’ life on stage. First, I assess how well this version of the drama-turgical metaphor accounts for both theatre acting and social interaction. The complexly layered, psychological aspects of theatre acting reveal the limitations of Goffman’s model. The second critical issue pertains to the implications of a psychology of theatre acting for conceptions of the self. The flexible, relational nature of theatre actors’ multiple ‘selves’ challenges psychologists’ literalist applications of dramaturgy to social actors as well as essentialist conceptions of a core self, while complementing postmodern notions of relational selves.
Aaron, S. (1986). Stage fright. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
2.
Alcock, J. E. , Carment, D. W. , & Sadava, S. W. (1998). A textbook of social psychology (4th ed.). Toronto: Prentice Hall .
3.
Arnold, N. (1991). The manipulation of the audience by the director and actor. In G. D. Wilson (Ed.), Psychology and performing arts (pp. 75-81). Amsterdam/Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger .
4.
Aronson, E. , Wilson, T. D. , Akert, R. M. , & Fehr, B. (2001). Social psychology (Canadian ed.). Toronto: Prentice Hall .
5.
Barish, J. A. (1981). The antitheatrical prejudice. Berkeley: University of California Press .
6.
Bates, B. C. (1987). The way of the actor. Boston, MA: Shambhala .
7.
Bates, B. C. (1991). Performance and possession: The actor and our inner demons. In G. D. Wilson (Ed.), Psychology and performing arts (pp. 11-18). Amsterdam/Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger .
8.
Baumeister, R. F. (1987). How the self became a problem: A psychological review of historical research . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 163-176 .
9.
Baumeister, R. F. (1997). The self and society: Changes, problems, and opportunities. In R. D. Ashmore & L. Jussim (Eds.), Self and identity; Fundamental issues (pp. 191-217). New York: Oxford University Press .
10.
Bloch, S. , Orthous, P. , & Santibanez, H. G. (1987). Effector patterns of basic emotions: A psychophysiological method for training actors . Journal of Social and Biological Structure, 10, 1-19 .
11.
Bohan, J. S. (2002). Sex differences and/in the self: Classic themes, feminist variations, postmodern challenges . Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 74-88 .
12.
Brehm, S. S. , Kassin, S. M. , & Fein, S. (1999). Social psychology (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin .
13.
Brissett, D. , & Edgely, C. (1990). Life as theater: A dramaturgical sourcebook (2nd ed.). New YorkAldine de Gruyter .
14.
Burke, K. (1945). A grammar of motives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall .
15.
Burns, E. (1972). Theatricality: A study of convention in the theatre and in social life. London: Longman .
16.
Buss, A. H. , & Briggs, S. R. (1984). Drama and the self in social interaction . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1310-1324 .
17.
Calkins, M. W. (1915). The self in scientific psychology . American Journal of Psychology, 26, 495-524 .
18.
Constantinidis, S. E. (1988). Rehearsal as a subsystem: Transactional analysis and role research . New Theatre Quarterly, 4, 64-76 .
19.
Cooley, C. (1922). Human nature and social order. New York: Scribner’s .
20.
Cushman, P. (1990). Why the self is empty: Toward a historically situated psychology . American Psychologist, 45, 599-611 .
21.
Danziger, K. (1997a). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. London: Sage .
22.
Danziger, K. (1997b). The historical formation of selves. In R. D. Ashmore & L. Jussim (Eds.), Self and identity: Fundamental issues (pp. 137-159). New York: Oxford University Press .
23.
Fenichel, O. (1946). On acting . Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 15, 144-160 .
24.
Fisher, S. , & Fisher, R. L. (1981). Pretend the world is funny and forever: A psychological analysis of comedians, clowns, and actors. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
25.
Fogel, A. , de Koeyer, I. , Bellagamba, F. , & Bell, H. (2002). The dialogical self in the first two years of life: Embarking on a journey of discovery . Theory & Psychology, 12, 191-205 .
26.
Franzoi, S. L. (2000). Social psychology (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill .
27.
George, D. E. R. (1986). Letter to a poor actor . New Theatre Quarterly, 2, 352-363 .
28.
Gergen, K. J. (1971). The concept of self. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston .
29.
Gergen, K. J. (1990). Metaphor, metatheory, and the social world. In D. E. Leary (Ed.), Metaphors in the history of psychology (pp. 267-299). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
30.
Gergen, K. J. (1992). Toward a postmodern psychology. In S. Kvale (Ed.), Psychology and postmodernism (pp. 17-30). London: Sage .
31.
Gergen, K. J. , & Gergen, M. (1988). Narrative and the self as relationship. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 17-56). New York: Academic Press .
32.
Gergen, M. (1992). From mod masculinity to post-mod macho: A feminist re-play. In S. Kvale (Ed.), Psychology and postmodernism (pp. 183-193). London: Sage .
33.
Gleitman, H. (1990). Some reflections on drama and the dramatic experience. In I. Rock (Ed.), The legacy of Solomon Asch: Essays in cognition and social psychology (pp. 127-141). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
34.
Goffmann, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday .
35.
Guisinger, S. , & Blatt, S. J. (1994). Individuality and relatedness: Evolution of a fundamental dialectic . American Psychologist, 49, 104-111 .
36.
Hammond, J. , & Edelmann, R. J. (1991a). Double identity: The effect of the acting process on the self-perception of professional actors—two case illustrations. In G. D. Wilson (Ed.), Psychology and performing arts (pp. 25-44). Amsterdam/Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger .
37.
Hammond, J. , & Edelmann, R. J. (1991b). The act of being: Personality characteristics of professional actors, amateur actors and non-actors. In G. D. Wilson (Ed.), Psychology and performing arts (pp. 45-58). Amsterdam/Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger .
38.
Hare-Mustin, R. , & Maracek, J. (1990). Making a difference: Psychology and the construction of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
39.
Harré, R. (1977). The self in monodrama. In T. Mischel (Ed.), The self: Psychological and philosophical issues (pp. 318-348). Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield .
40.
Harré, R. (1991). The discursive production of selves . Theory & Psychology, 1, 51-63 .
41.
Harré, R. (1993). Social beings (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell .
42.
Hayman, R. (1973). The set-up: An anatomy of the English theatre today. London: Eyre Methuen .
43.
Henry, W. E. , & Sims, J. H. (1970). Actors’ search for self . Transaction, 7, 57-62 .
44.
Jackson, R. , & Smallwood, R. (1988). Players of Shakespeare 2: Further essays in Shakespearean performance by players with the Royal Shakespeare Company. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
45.
James, W. (1950). The principles of psychology (Vols. 1 & 2). New York: Dover . (Original work published 1890.)
46.
Kelsey, R. B. (1984). The actor’s representation: Gesture, play, and language . Philosophy and Literature, 8, 67-74 .
47.
Kochnev, V. I. (1990). The stage emotional experience: Attempt at the solution of the problem . Soviet Journal of Psychology, 11, 56-69 .
48.
Konijn, E. A. (1991). What’s on between the actor and his audience? Empirical analysis of emotion processes in the theatre. In G. D. Wilson (Ed.), Psychology and performing arts (pp. 59-74). Amsterdam/Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger .
49.
Kvale, S. (Ed.). (1992). Psychology and postmodernism. London: Sage .
50.
Landy, R. J. (1993). Persona and performance: The meaning of role in drama, therapy, and everyday life. New York: Guilford .
51.
Lather, P. (1992). Postmodernism and the human sciences. In S. Kvale (Ed.), Psychology and postmodernism (pp. 88-109). London: Sage .
52.
Leary, M. R. (1996). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. Boulder, CO: Westview .
53.
Lessing, D. (1996). Love, again. New York: HarperCollins .
54.
Lovlie, L. (1992). Postmodernism and subjectivity. In S. Kvale (Ed.), Psychology and postmodernism (pp. 119-134). London: Sage .
55.
Lykes, M. B. (1985). Gender and individualistic vs. collectivist bases for notions about the self . Journal of Personality, 53, 356-383 .
56.
Mack, M. (1962). Engagement and detachment in Shakespeare’s plays. In R. Hosley (Ed.), Essays on Shakespeare and Elizabethan drama (pp. 275-296). Columbia: University of Missouri Press .
57.
Mangham, I. L. , & Overington, C. A. (1983). Dramatism and the theatrical metaphor. In G. Morgan (Ed.), Beyond method: Strategies for social research (pp. 219-233). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
58.
Marchant-Haycox, S. E. , & Wilson, G. D. (1992). Personality and stress in performing artists . Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 1061-1068 .
59.
Marinovic, M. , & Carbonell, E. (2000). A psychological study of Chilean actors’ views of their art . The Arts in Psychotherapy, 27, 245-261 .
60.
McCall, G. J. (1977). The social looking-glass: A sociological perspective on self-development. In T. Mischel (Ed.), The self: Psychological and philosophical issues (pp. 274-287). Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield .
61.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
62.
Murray, P. B. (1996). Shakespeare’s imagined persons: The psychology of role-playing and acting. Lanham, MD: Barnes & Noble .
63.
Park, R. E. (1927). Human nature and collective behavior . American Journal of Sociology, 32, 733-741 .
64.
Pervin, L. A. (2002). Current controversies and issues in personality (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley .
65.
Rose, N. (1996). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
66.
Sampson, E. E. (1988). The debate on individualism: Indigenous psychologies of the individual and their role in personal and societal functioning . American Psychologist, 43, 15-22 .
67.
Sampson, E. E. (1993). Celebrating the other: A dialogic account of human nature. Boulder, CO: Westview .
68.
Sampson, E. E. (2003). Unconditional kindness to strangers: Human sociality and the foundation for an ethical psychology . Theory & Psychology, 13, 147-175 .
69.
Sarbin, T. R. (Ed.). (1986). Narrative psychology. New York: Praeger .
70.
Sarbin, T. R. (2003). The dramaturgical approach to social psychology: The influence of Erving Goffman. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The anatomy of impact: What makes the great works of psychology great (pp. 125-136). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
71.
Sarbin, T. R. , & Allen, V. L. (1968). Role theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 488-567). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
72.
Scheibe, K. E. (2000). The drama of everyday life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
73.
Schlenker, B. R. , & Weigold, M. F. (1992). Interpersonal processes involving impression regulation and management . Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 133-168 .
74.
Schmitt, N. C. (1986). Stanislavski, creativity, and the unconscious . New Theatre Quarterly, 2, 345-351 .
75.
Schmitt, N. C. (1990). Actors and onlookers: Theater and twentieth-century views of nature. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press .
76.
Stanislavski, C. (1948). An actor prepares (E.R. Hapgood, Trans.). New York: Theatre Arts Books .
77.
Stanislavski, C. (1958). Stanislavski’s legacy ( E. R. Hapgood , Ed. and Trans.). New York: Theatre Arts Books . (Original work published 1924.)
78.
States, B. O. (1983). The actor’s presence: Three phenomenal modes . Theatre Journal, 35, 359-375 .
79.
States, B. O. (1985). Great reckonings in little rooms: On the phenomenology of the theater. Berkeley: University of California Press .
80.
States, B. O. (1992). Hamlet and the concept of character. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press .
81.
Surrey, J. L. (1991). The self-in-relation: A theory of women’s development. In J. V. Jordan , A. G. Kaplan , J. B. Miller , I. P. Stiver , & J. L. Surrey (Eds.), Women’s growth in connection: Writings from the Stone Center (pp. 51-66). New York: Guilford .
82.
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
83.
Taylor, S. E. , Peplau, L. A. , & Sears, D. O. (2000). Social psychology (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall .
84.
Ure, P. (1974). Shakespeare and the inward self of the tragic hero. In J. C. Maxwell (Ed.), Elizabethan and Jacobean drama: Critical essays by Peter Ure (pp. 1-21). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press .
85.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1967). Play and its role in the mental development of the child . Soviet Psychology, 5, 6-18 .
86.
Walsh-Bowers, R. , O’Dell, L. , Wiltshire, C. , & Fong, J. (1994, July). Selves in relation: Actors’ views on the psychology of acting . Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Pentiction, BC.
87.
Wilshire, B. (1982a). Role playing and identity: The limits of theatre as metaphor. Bloomington: Indiana University Press .
88.
Wilshire, B. (1982b). The dramaturgical model of behavior: Its strengths and weaknesses . Symbolic Interaction, 5, 287-297 .
89.
Wilson, G. D. (1994). Psychology for performing artists: Butterflies and bouquets. London: Jessica Kingsley .
90.
Wilson, G. D. (2002). Psychology for performing artists (2nd ed.). London: Whurr .
91.
Young, N. (1992). Postmodern self-psychology mirrored in science and the arts. In S. Kvale (Ed.), Psychology and postmodernism (pp. 135-145). London: Sage .
92.
Zarrilli, P. B. (1989, Spring). Thinking and talking about acting: Re-reading Sonia Moore’s Training an actor . Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism, pp. 37-51 .
