Character is central to positive psychology's efforts to understand and promote human flourishing. Despite the importance of character and ubiquitous references to Aristotle, virtue theory remains underdeveloped in positive psychology. This article elaborates three key aspects of virtue ethics for understanding flourishing: goodness, the unity of character, and character types. Positive psychologists have not developed a substantial concept of what is good, which is essential because virtues are defined as the enduring personal qualities necessary for pursuing particular goods. Positive psychologists present virtue in a fragmented manner, focusing on a few `signature strengths,' whereas virtue ethicists generally emphasize the unity of character and the development of a full range of virtues. Because positive psychologists have not recognized the four character types in addition to virtuous character, they often misconstrue the continent character as virtuous, and many of their descriptors of the good life do not differentiate well between the virtuous and the vicious character types.
Aristotle. (1998). The Nicomachean ethics (D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. (Original work published c. 330 BCE)
2.
Baumeister, R.F., & Exline, J.J. (1999). Virtue, personality, and social relations: Self-control as the moral muscle. Journal of Personality, 67, 1165-1194.
3.
Baumeister, R.F., & Exline, J.J. (2000). Self-control, morality, and human strength. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 29-42.
4.
Broadie, S. (1991). Ethics with Aristotle. Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press.
5.
Chang, E.C., & Sanna, L.J. (Eds.). (2003). Virtue, vice, and personality: The complexity of behavior. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6.
Csikszentmihályi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
7.
Cushman, P. (1995). Constructing the self, constructing America: A cultural history of psychotherapy. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8.
Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Fowers, B.J. (2000). The myth of marital happiness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Fowers, B.J. (2001). The limits of a technical concept of a good marriage: Examining the role of virtues in communication skills. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27, 327-340.
11.
Fowers, B.J. (2003). Reason and human finitude: In praise of practical wisdom. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 415-426.
12.
Fowers, B.J. (2005). Virtue and psychology: Pursuing excellence in ordinary practices. Washington, DC: APA Press.
13.
Fowers, B.J., & Davidov, B.J. (2006). The virtue of multiculturalism: Personal transformation, character, and openness to the other. American Psychologist , 61, 581-594.
14.
Fromm, E. (1965). Escape from freedom. New York : Avon. (Original work published 1941)
15.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1994). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D.G. Marshall, Trans.; 2nd rev. ed.). New York : Continuum. (Original work published 1960)
16.
Guignon, C. (2002). Hermeneutics, authenticity, and the aims of psychology . Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 22, 83-102.
17.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row. (Original work published 1927)
18.
Held, B. (2004). The negative side of positive psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 44, 9-46.
19.
Held, B. (2005). The `virtues' of positive psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 25, 1-34.
20.
Hursthouse, R. (1999). On virtue ethics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21.
Jorgensen, I.S., & Nafstad, H.E. (2004). Positive psychology: Historical, philosophical, and epistemological perspectives. In M.E.P. Seligman, P.A. Linley, & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 15-34). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
22.
Keyes, C.L.M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C.D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 82, 1007-1022.
23.
King, L.A., Eells, J.E., & Burton, C.M. (2004). The good life, broadly and narrowly considered . In M.E.P. Seligman, P.A. Linley, & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 35-52). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
24.
MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
25.
MacIntyre, A. (1999). Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. Chicago: Open Court .
26.
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M.E.P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Washington, DC : American Psychological Association.
27.
Prilleltensky, I. (1997). Values, assumptions, and practices: Assessing the moral implications of psychological discourse and action. American Psychologist, 5, 517-535.
28.
Richardson, F.C., Fowers, B.J., & Guignon, C. (1999). Re-envisioning psychology: Moral dimensions of theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29.
Rorty, A.O. (Ed.). (1980). Essays on Aristotle's ethics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
30.
Ryff, C.D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081.
