Against recent attempts to forge a reconciliation between constructionism and realism, I contend that, in psychology at least, stirring up conflict is a more fruitful strategy. To illustrate this thesis, I confront a school of psychology with strong realist leanings, evolutionary psychology, with the relativist critique of realism proposed by Edwards, Ashmore, and Potter. I show that evolutionary psychology employs the kind of “bottomline arguments” that they identify as typical of realist rhetoric. However, it also proposes a modified realism based on a concept of mediation, which accommodates a moderate social constructionism. I argue that there are good reasons to reject such a settlement between realism and constructionism. The theories of emergence that have been developed both in biology and in science and technology studies cast doubt on the view of the brain as a fully specifiable mediator.
Adriaens, P.R., & de Block, A. ( 2006). The evolution of a social construction: The case of male homosexuality. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 49, 570-585.
2.
Barrett, L., Dunbar, R., & Lycett, J. ( 2002). Human evolutionary psychology. New York, NY: Palgrave.
3.
Bijker, W.E., & Law, J. (Eds.). (1992). Shaping technology/Building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
4.
Bridgeman, B. ( 2003). Psychology and evolution: The origins of mind. London: Sage.
5.
Buller, D. ( 2005a). Adapting minds: Evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
Buller, D. ( 2005b). Get over: Massive modularity. Biology and Philosophy, 20, 881-891.
7.
Buss, D.M. ( 2008). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
8.
Cassidy, A. ( 2006). Evolutionary psychology as public science and boundary work. Public Understanding of Science, 15, 175-206.
9.
Clark, A. ( 2003). Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.
Cosmides, L. ( 2001). Leda Cosmides interviewed by Alvaro Fischer and Roberto Araya. Retrieved September 24, 2007, from http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/ledainterview.htm
11.
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. ( 1994). Beyond intuition and instinct blindness: Toward an evolutionarily rigorous cognitive science. Cognition, 50, 41-77.
12.
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. ( 1997). Evolutionary psychology: A primer. Retrieved August 25, 2009, from http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/primer.html
13.
Crawford, C. ( 2004). Public policy and personal decisions: The evolutionary context. In C. Crawford & C. Salmon, (Eds.), Evolutionary psychology, public policy and personal decisions (pp. 3-22). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
Daly, M., Wilson, M., & Weghorst, S.J. (1982). Male sexual jealousy. Ethology and Sociobiology, 3, 11-27.
15.
Dear, P. ( 2001). Science studies as epistemography. In J. Labinger & H. Collins (Eds.), The one culture? A conversation about science (pp. 128-141). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Derksen, M. ( 2007). Cultivating human nature. New Ideas in Psychology, 25, 189- 206.
17.
Dixson, A., Halliwell, G., East, R., Wignarajah, P., & Anderson, M. ( 2003). Masculine somatotype and hirsuteness as determinants of sexual attractiveness to women. Archives of Sexual Behavior , 32, 29-39.
18.
Dupré, J. ( 2002). Humans and other animals. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19.
Edley, N. ( 2001). Unravelling social constructionism. Theory & Psychology, 11, 433-441.
20.
Edwards, D., Ashmore, M., & Potter, J. ( 1995). Death and furniture: The rhetoric, politics and theology of bottom line arguments against relativism. History of the Human Sciences, 8(2), 25-49.
21.
Fodor, J.A. ( 2000). The mind doesn’t work that way: The scope and limits of computational psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22.
Freese, J., & Meland, S. ( 2002). Seven tenths incorrect: Heterogeneity and change in the waist-to-hip ratios of Playboy centerfold models and Miss America pageant winners. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 133-138.
23.
Gangestad, S.W., Haselton, M.G., & Buss, D.M. ( 2006). Evolutionary foundations of cultural variation: Evoked culture and mate preferences. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 75-95.
24.
Gergen, K.J. ( 1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology . American Psychologist, 40, 266-275.
25.
Hackett, E.J.,Amsterdamska, O.,Lynch, M., & Wajcman, J. (Eds.). (2008). The handbook of science and technology studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Society for Social Studies of Science .
26.
Hacking, I. ( 1995). The looping effects of human kinds. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 351-383). Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
27.
Hampton, S.J. ( 2004). Adaptations for nothing in particular. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 34, 35-53.
28.
Holcomb, H. ( 2004). Darwin and evolutionary moral psychology. In C. Crawford & C. Salmon (Eds.), Evolutionary psychology, public policy and personal decisions (pp. 73-95). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
29.
James, W. ( 1907). Pragmatism, a new name for some old ways of thinking . New York, NY: Longmans, Green, and Co.
30.
Jensen, C. ( 2004). A nonhumanist disposition: On performativity, practical ontology, and intervention. Configurations, 12, 229-261.
31.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. ( 2000). Why babies’ brains are not Swiss army knives. In H.R. &. S. Rose (Eds.), Alas poorDarwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology (pp. 144-156). London, UK: Cape.
32.
Knorr Cetina, K. ( 1993). Strong constructivism-from a sociologist’s point of view: A personal addendum to Sismondo’s paper. Social Studies of Science, 23, 555-563.
33.
Latour, B. ( 1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
Latour, B. ( 2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35.
Levy, N. ( 2004). Evolutionary psychology, human universals, and the standard social science model. Biology & Philosophy, 19, 459-472.
36.
Lewontin, R.C., Rose, S.P.R., & Kamin, L.J. ( 1984). Not in our genes: Biology, ideology, and human nature . New York, NY: Pantheon.
37.
Lickliter, R., & Honeycutt, H. ( 2003a). Developmental dynamics: Toward a biologically plausible evolutionary psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 819-35.
38.
Lickliter, R., & Honeycutt, H. ( 2003b). Developmental dynamics and contemporary evolutionary psychology: Status quo or irreconcilable views? Reply to Bjorklund (2003), Krebs (2003), Buss and Reeve (2003), Crawford (2003), and Tooby et al. (2003) . Psychological Bulletin, 129, 866-872.
39.
Lynch, M. ( 2001). Is a science peace process necessary? In J. Labinger & H. Collins (Eds.), The one culture? A conversation about science (pp. 48-60). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
40.
Mallon, R. ( 2007). A field guide to social construction. Philosophy Compass, 2, 93- 108.
41.
Mallon, R., & Stich, S.P. ( 2000). The odd couple: The compatibility of social construction and evolutionary psychology. Philosophy of Science, 67, 133-154.
42.
Nicholson, N. ( 2005). Objections to evolutionary psychology: Reflections, implications and the leadership exemplar. Human Relations, 58, 393-409.
43.
Oyama, S. ( 1993). How shall I name thee? The construction of natural selves . Theory & Psychology, 3, 471-496.
44.
Pickering, A. ( 1993). The mangle of practice: Agency and emergence in the sociology of science. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 559-589.
45.
Pinker, S. ( 1997). How the mind works. New York, NY: Norton.
46.
Pinker, S. ( 2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. London, UK: Penguin.
47.
Pinker, S. ( 2008). Have humans stopped evolving?Edge. Retrieved June 4, 2008, from http://www.edge.org/q2008/q08_8.html
48.
Plotkin, H. ( 2002). The imagined world made real: Towards a natural science of culture. London, UK: Allen Lane/Penguin.
49.
Ridley, M. ( 2003). Nature via nurture: Genes, experience and what makes us human. London, UK: Fourth Estate .
50.
Rose, H. ( 1996). My enemy’s enemy is, only perhaps, my friend. Social Text, 14, 61-80.
51.
Rossano, M.J. ( 2003). Evolutionary psychology: The science of human behavior and evolution. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley .
52.
Singh, D. ( 1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293-307.
53.
Soler, C., Nunez, M., Gutierrez, R., Nunez, J., Medina, P., Sancho, M., et al. (2003). Facial attractiveness in men provides clues to semen quality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 199-207.
54.
Stam, H.J. (Ed.). (2001). Social constructionism and its critics [Special issue]. Theory & Psychology, 11(3).
55.
Stam, H.J. (Ed.). (2002). Varieties of social constructionism [Special issue]. Theory & Psychology, 12(5).
56.
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. ( 1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind; evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19-136). Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press.
57.
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. ( 2005). Conceptual foundations of evolutionary psychology. In D. Buss (Ed.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 5-67). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
58.
Voight, B., Kudaravalli, S., Wen, X., & Pritchard, J. ( 2006). A map of recent positive selection in the human genome . PLOS Biology, 4, 446-458.
59.
Wilson, D.S. ( 2005). Evolutionary social constructivism. In J. Gottschall & D.S. Wilson (Eds.), The literary animal: Evolution and the nature of narrative (pp. 20-37). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
