This paper presents a repetitive control-based independent design method for high-performance tracking control of piezoelectric actuators. This work applies an inverse Prandtl–Ishlinskii hysteresis model as a non-linear feedforward compensator to compensate for the hysteresis effect, and validates its inverse model by open-loop compensation. To achieve precision tracking control, the current study designs and implements the feedback control using a prototype repetitive control algorithm, integrating the inverse linear plant model-based feedforward compensation and hysteresis compensation methods to further reduce tracking error. Experimental results and performance analysis demonstrate that using the control structure further improves tracking performance.
GePJouanehM. Modeling hysteresis in piezoceramic actuators. Precis Engng1995; 17(3): 211–221.
2.
GoldfarbMCelanovicN. Modeling piezoelectric stack actuators for control of micromanipulation. IEEE Control Syst Mag1997; 17(3): 69–79.
3.
AdriaensHJMTSDe KoningWLBanningR. Modeling piezoelectric actuators. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2000; 5(4): 331–341.
4.
JanochaHKuhnenK. Real-time compensation of hysteresis and creep in piezoelectric actuators. Sens Actuators A: Phys2000; 79(2): 83–89.
5.
CroftDShedGDevasiaS. Creep, hysteresis, and vibration compensation for piezoactuators: atomic force microscopy application. Trans ASME, J Dyn Syst Meas Control2001; 123(1): 35–43.
6.
KuhnenKJanochaH. Inverse feedforward controller for complex hysteretic nonlinearities in smart-material systems. Control Intell Syst2001; 29(3): 74–83.
7.
KuhnenKPrevidiF. Modeling, identification and compensation of complex hysteretic nonlinearities: a modified Prandtl–Ishlinskii approach, discussion. Eur J Control2003; 9(4): 407–418.
8.
GePJouanehM. Tracking control of a piezoceramic actuator. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol1996; 4(3): 209–216.
9.
SongGZhaoJZhouX. Tracking control of a piezoceramic actuator with hysteresis compensation using inverse Preisach model. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2005; 10(2): 198–209.
10.
RuCSunL. Improving positioning accuracy of piezoelectric actuators by feedforward hysteresis compensation based on a new mathematical model. Rev Sci Instrum2005; 76(9): 095111.
11.
LinCJYangSR. Precise positioning of piezo-actuated stages using hysteresis observer based control. Mechatronics2006; 16(7): 417–426.
12.
ShenJCJyweWYChiangHK. Precision tracking control of a piezoelectric-actuated system. Precis Engng2008; 32(2): 71–78.
13.
TsaiMSChenJS. Robust tracking control of a piezoactuator using a new approximate hysteresis model. Trans ASME, J Dyn Syst Meas Control2003; 125(1): 96–102.
14.
LinFJShiehHJHuangPK. Adaptive wavelet neural network control with hysteresis estimation for piezo-positioning mechanism. IEEE Trans Neural Netw2006; 17(2): 432–444.
15.
BashashSJaliliN. Robust multiple frequency trajectory tracking control of piezoelectrically driven micro/nanopositioning systems. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2007; 15(5): 867–878.
16.
XieWFFuJYaoH. Neural network based adaptive control of piezoelectric actuators with unknown hysteresis. Int J Adapt Control Signal Process2009; 23(1): 30–54.
17.
LiawHCShirinzadehBSmithJ. Sliding-mode enhanced adaptive motion tracking control of piezoelectric actuation systems for micro/nano manipulation. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2008; 16(4): 826–833.
18.
PostlethwaiteI. Multivariable feedback control: analysis and design. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1996.
19.
LeeCSalapakaSM. Robust broadband nanopositioning: fundamental trade-offs, analysis, and design in a two-degree-of-freedom control framework. Nanotechnology2009; 20(3): 035501.
20.
RasmussenJTsaoTCHansonR. A piezoelectric tool servo system for variable depth of cut machining. In: ASME winter annual meeting, PED 58 (JouanehMRangwalaSS eds), Anaheim, CA, 8–13 November 1992, pp.119–130.
21.
ChoiGSLimYAChoiGH. Tracking position control of piezoelectric actuators for periodic reference inputs. Mechatronics2002; 12(5): 669–684.
22.
AnhHS. Design of a repetitive control system for a piezoelectric actuator based on the inverse hysteresis model. In: The fourth international conference on control and automation, Montreal, Canada, 9–12 June 2003, pp.128–132. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
23.
KimBSLiJTsaoTC. Two-parameter robust repetitive control with application to a novel dual-stage actuator for noncircular machining. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2004; 9(4): 644–652.
24.
FrancisBAWonhamWM. The internal model principle of control theory. Automatica1976; 12(5): 457–465.
25.
TomizukaMTsaoTCChewKK. Analysis and synthesis of discrete-time repetitive controllers. Trans ASME, J Dyn Syst Meas Control1989; 111(3): 353–358.
26.
KrishnamoorthyKLinCYTsaoTC. Design and control of a dual stage fast tool servo for precision machining. In: IEEE international conference on control applications, Taipei, Taiwan, 2–4 September 2004, pp.742–747. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
27.
LinCYTsaoTC. Nano-precision dynamic motion control. In: PostekMTAllgairJA (eds) Instrumentation, metrology, and standards for nanomanufacturing. Bellingham, WA: SPIE2007, paper number 66480H.
28.
TomizukaM. Zero phase error tracking algorithm for digital control. Trans ASME, J Dyn Syst Meas Control1987; 109(1): 65–68.
29.
AridoganUShanYLeangKK. Design and analysis of discrete time repetitive control for scanning probe microscopes. Trans ASME, J Dyn Syst Meas Control2009; 131(6): 061103.
30.
TsaoTCTomizukaM. Robust adaptive and repetitive digital tracking control and application to a hydraulic servo for noncircular machining. Trans ASME, J Dyn Syst Meas Control1994; 116(1): 24–32.
31.
DoyleJCFrancisBATannenbaumAR. Feedback control theory. New York, NY: Macmillan, 1992.
32.
Cedrat Technologies. Piezo products catalogue version 3.2, http://www.cedrat.com (2007, accessed September 2007).
33.
LeviEC. Complex-curve fitting. IRE Trans Autom Control1959; 4(03): 37–44.
