This article investigates the problem of designing robust guidance laws for intercepting maneuvering targets with desired terminal line-of-sight angle constraint. Based on generalized model predictive control for the nominal system, the discontinuous and continuous integral sliding mode control laws are, respectively, developed. Stability analysis shows that the proposed guidance law can ensure the optimal tracking characteristic of generalized model predictive control algorithm and the line-of-sight angle tracking error as well as the line-of-sight angular rate can converge to zero asymptotically. The effectiveness of the proposed guidance law is validated by applying it to a surface-to-air missile for intercepting a head-on maneuvering target under different scenarios.
ErerKSMerttopcuogluO.Indirect impact-angle-control against stationary targets using biased pure proportional navigation. J Guid Control Dynam2012; 35(2): 700–704.
2.
RyooCKChoHTahkMJ.Time-to-go weighted optimal guidance with impact angle constraints. IEEE T Contr Syst T2006; 14(3): 483–492.
3.
TaubIShimaT.Intercept angle missile guidance under time varying acceleration bounds. J Guid Control Dynam2013; 36(3): 686–699.
4.
HeSLinD.A robust impact angle constraint guidance law with seeker’s field-of-view limit. T I Meas Control2015; 37(3): 317–328.
5.
KimMGriderKV.Terminal guidance for impact attitude angle constrained flight trajectories. IEEE T Aero Elec Sys1973; 9(6): 852–859.
6.
OhlmeyerEJPhillipsCA.Generalized vector explicit guidance. J Guid Control Dynam2006; 29(2): 261–268.
7.
LeeCHTahkMJLeeJI.Generalized formulation of weighted optimal guidance laws with impact angle constraint. IEEE T Aero Elec Sys2013; 49(2): 1317–1322.
8.
KimTHLeeCHTahkMJ.Time-to-go polynomial guidance with trajectory modulation for observability enhancement. IEEE T Aero Elec Sys2013; 49(1): 55–73.
9.
LeeCHKimTHTahkMJ.Design of impact angle control guidance laws via high-performance sliding mode control. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2013; 227(2): 235–253.
10.
NeslineFWZarchanP.A new look at classical vs modern homing missile guidance. J Guid Control Dynam1981; 4(1): 78–85.
11.
LuKXiaYYuC. Finite-time intercept-angle guidance. Int J Control2014; 88(2): 264–275.
12.
ShimaT.Intercept-angle guidance. J Guid Control Dynam2011; 34(2): 484–492.
13.
KumarSRRaoSGhoseD.Sliding-mode guidance and control for all-aspect interceptors with terminal angle constraints. J Guid Control Dynam2012; 35(4): 1230–1246.
14.
KumarSRRaoSGhoseD.Nonsingular terminal sliding mode guidance with impact angle constraints. J Guid Control Dynam2014; 37(4): 1114–1130.
15.
ZhangZLiSLuoS.Composite guidance laws based on sliding mode control with impact angle constraint and autopilot lag. T I Meas Control2013; 35(6): 764–776.
16.
ZhangZLiSLuoS.Terminal guidance laws of missile based on ISMC and NDOB with impact angle constraint. Aerosp Sci Technol2013; 31(1): 30–41.
17.
PoznyakAFridmanLBejaranoFJ.Mini-max integral sliding-mode control for multi model linear uncertain systems. IEEE T Automat Contr2004; 49(1): 97–102.
18.
LiangYWChenCCLiawDC. Nonlinear reliable control with application to a vehicle antilock brake system. IEEE T Ind Inform2013; 9(4): 2114–2123.
19.
RenTZhuZYuH. Integral sliding mode controller design for congestion problem in ATM networks. Int J Control2013; 86(3): 529–539.
20.
LiangYWChenCCLiawDC. Robust guidance law via integral-sliding-mode scheme. J Guid Control Dynam2014; 37(3): 1038–1042.
21.
LiuRLiS.Optimal integral sliding mode control scheme based on pseudospectral method for robotic manipulators. Int J Control2014; 87(6): 1131–1140.
22.
XuJ.A quasi-optimal sliding mode control scheme based on control Lyapunov function. J Franklin I2011; 349(4): 1445–1458.
23.
ImaniABahramiM.Optimal sliding mode control for spacecraft formation flying in eccentric orbits. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2013; 227(5): 474–481.
24.
ChenWHBalanceDJGawthropPJ.Optimal control of nonlinear systems: a predictive control approach. Automatica2003; 39(4): 633–641.
25.
LuP.Optimal predictive control of continuous nonlinear systems. Int J Control1995; 62(3): 633–649.
26.
MaederUMorariM.Offset-free reference tracking with model predictive control. Automatica2010; 46(9): 1469–1476.
27.
ZarchanP.Tactical and strategic missile guidance. New York: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Publications, 1998.
28.
BinazadehTYazdanpanahMJ.Robust partial control design for non-linear control systems: a guidance application. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2011; 226(2): 233–242.
29.
ZhouDSunSTeoKL.Guidance laws with finite time convergence. J Guid Control Dynam2009; 32(6): 1838–1846.
30.
ZhouDXuB.Adaptive dynamic surface guidance law with input saturation constraint and autopilot dynamics. J Guid Control Dynam. Epub ahead of print 11January2016. DOI: 10.2514/1.G001236.
31.
PhadkeSBTaloleSE.Sliding mode and inertial delay control based missile guidance. IEEE T Aero Elec Sys2012; 48(4): 3331–3346.
32.
MorganRWTharpHVincentTL.Minimum energy guidance for aerodynamically controlled missiles. IEEE T Automat Contr2011; 56(9): 2026–2037.
33.
SunXXiaY.Optimal guidance law for cooperative attack of multiple missiles based on optimal control theory. Int J Control2012; 85(8): 1063–1070.
34.
RawlingAG.On nonzero miss distance. J Spacecraft Rockets1969; 6(1): 81–83.
35.
BhatSPBernsteinDS.Finite-time stability of continuous autonomous systems. SIAM J Control Optim2000; 38(3): 751–766.
