Positioning control of hydraulic cylinder with unknown friction using on/off directional control valve

Abstract

In this study, a prediction-based positioning control scheme is proposed for the hydraulic cylinder controlled by a solenoid operated on/off directional control valve. The discrete-valued input, low switching frequency and significant delay of directional control valve make the control problem very complex. Only a discrete-valued control input can be used here; meanwhile, the input has switching frequency constraint and time-delay. Existing methods such as pulse-width modulation control and sliding-mode control are not suitable for this problem, because chattering may arise due to the control input restrictions. The newly proposed prediction-based positioning control scheme consists of two parts: a switching law based on predictions of future states and learning algorithms which learn required predictive models online. According to accurate predictions, the switching law can control the hydraulic cylinder to target position in an optimal way, and chattering is avoided. Meanwhile, the required predictive models are identified by a generalized growing and pruning for radial basis function network and a recursive least square estimation algorithm in real time. Essentially, the problems caused by input restrictions, time-delay and model uncertainty are solved by the accurate identifications to some well-designed models. The control scheme is verified by physical experiments. Fast and accurate positioning control can be achieved for the hydraulic cylinder with unknown nonlinear friction.

Keywords

Restricted control input time-delay unknown friction non-model-based identification directional control valve hydraulic positioning control

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Van Varseveld

Bone

. Accurate position control of a pneumatic actuator using on/off solenoid valves. IEEE/ASME T Mech 1997; 2: 195–204.

Shen

Zhang

Barth

et al . Nonlinear averaging applied to the control of pulse width modulated (PWM) pneumatic systems. In: Proceedings of the 2004 American control conference, vol. 5, Boston, MA, 30 June–2 July 2004, pp.4444–4448. New York: IEEE.

Hodgson

Tavakoli

Pham

et al . Nonlinear discontinuous dynamics averaging and PWM-based sliding control of solenoid-valve pneumatic actuators. IEEE/ASME T Mech 2015; 20: 876–888.

Guglielmino

Semini

Yang

et al . Energy efficient fluid power in autonomous legged robotics. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2009 dynamic systems and control conference, Hollywood, CA, 12–14 October 2009, pp.847–854. New York: ASME.

Kogler

Scheidl

. 6 Linear motion control with a low-power hydraulic switching converter - Part II: flatness-based control. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering 2015; 229: 818–828.

Nguyen

. Accurate sliding-mode control of pneumatic systems using low-cost solenoid valves. IEEE/ASME T Mech 2007; 12: 216–219.

Márton

Fodor

Sepehri

. A practical method for friction identification in hydraulic actuators. Mechatronics 2011; 21: 350–356.

Tran

Khaing

Endo

et al . Effect of friction model on simulation of hydraulic actuator. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering 2014; 228: 690–698.

Bonchis

Corke

Rye

. A pressure-based, velocity independent, friction model for asymmetric hydraulic cylinders. In: Proceedings 1999 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (Cat. No.99ch36288c), vol. 3, Detroit, MI, 10–15 May 1999, pp.1746–1751. New York: IEEE.

10.

Yao

Reedy

et al . Adaptive robust motion control of single-rod hydraulic actuators: theory and experiments. IEEE/ASME T Mech 2000; 5: 79–91.

11.

Yao

Jiao

Yao

. Nonlinear adaptive robust backstepping force control of hydraulic load simulator: theory and experiments. J Mech Sci Technol 2014; 28: 1499–1507.

12.

Huang

Saratchandran

Sundararajan

. A generalized growing and pruning RBF (GGAP-RBF) neural network for function approximation. IEEE T Neural Networ 2005; 16: 57–67.

13.

Cetinkunt

. Mechatronics with experiments. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.

14.

Gawthrop

Wang

. Constrained intermittent model predictive control. Int J Control 2009; 82: 1138–1147.

15.

Gawthrop

Wang

. Intermittent model predictive control. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering 2007; 221: 1007–1018.

16.

Lowe

. Adaptive radial basis function nonlinearities, and the problem of generalisation. In: Proceedings of the first IEE international conference on artificial neural networks, London, 16–18 October 1989, pp.171–175. New York: IEEE.

17.

Landau

Lozano

Fettweis

et al . Adaptive control. Springer: London, 2011.