Adaptive-gain fast nonsingular terminal sliding mode for position control of a piezo positioning stage

Abstract

This article proposed a variable gain fast terminal sliding mode controller with an estimator of the uncertainty model for a piezo positioning stage system. The designed terminal sliding mode control has some advantages over the linear sliding mode control such as fast convergence and chattering reduction while maintains its robustness to the uncertainties. Next, an indirect technique is developed to enable the elimination of the singularity problem corresponding to initial terminal sliding mode control. In addition, a cerebellar model articulation controller is carried out to estimate the nonlinear dynamics of the piezo positioning stage. To deal with unknown bounds of uncertainties and disturbances, the proposed scheme consists of using online tuning control gains that ensure the establishment of a real terminal sliding mode in a finite time. Moreover, a fuzzy logic scheme is presented to smooth out the discontinuity part of the control signal, hence improve the control performance. Stability analysis of closed loop system is provided using the Lyapunov function method. Experiment results are presented to evaluate the effectiveness of the designed control approach.

Keywords

Terminal sliding mode control cerebellar model articulation controller fuzzy system

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Shieh

Huang

. Trajectory tracking of piezoelectric positioning stages using a dynamic sliding-mode control. IEEE T Ultrason Ferr 2006; 53: 1872–1882.

Zhong

Yao

. Adaptive robust precision motion control of a piezoelectric positioning stage. IEEE T Contr Syst T 2008; 16: 1039–1046.

Huang

Venkataramanan

et al . High-performance tracking of piezoelectric positioning stage using current-cycle iterative learning control with gain scheduling. IEEE T Ind Electron 2014; 61: 1085–1098.

Dinh

Ahn

. Radial basis function neural network based adaptive fast nonsingular terminal sliding mode controller for piezo positioning stage. Int J Control Autom 2017; 15: 2892–2905.

Meng-Shiun

Cheng-Hsueh

Sheng-Hung

. Dynamic modeling and analysis of a bimodal ultrasonic motor. IEEE T Ultrason Ferr 2003; 50: 245–256.

Lin

Shieh

Huang

et al . An adaptive recurrent radial basis function network tracking controller for a two-dimensional piezo-positioning stage. IEEE T Ultrason Ferr 2008; 55: 183–198.

Chang

Shen

. Disturbance-observer-based hysteresis compensation for piezoelectric actuators. IEEE: ASME T Mech 2009; 14: 456–464.

Lin

C-J

Yang

S-R

. Precise positioning of piezo-actuated stages using hysteresis-observer based control. Mechatronics 2006; 16: 417–426.

Chen

Hisayama

. Adaptive sliding-mode position control for piezo-actuated stage. IEEE T Ind Electron 2008; 55: 3927–3934.

10.

Truong

BNM

Ahn

. Inverse modeling and control of a dielectric electro-active polymer smart actuator. Sensor Actuat A: Phys 2015; 229: 118–127.

11.

Nam

DNC

Ahn

. Identification of an ionic polymer metal composite actuator employing Preisach type fuzzy NARX model and particle swarm optimization. Sensor Actuat A: Phys 2012; 183: 105–114.

12.

Tan

Heng

Zhou

. Micro-positioning of linear-piezoelectric motors based on a learning nonlinear PID controller. IEEE: ASME T Mech 2001; 6: 428–436.

13.

Lin

Chiang

Lin

. Tuning PID control parameters for micro-piezo-stage by using grey relational analysis. Expert Syst Appl 2011; 38: 13924–13932.

14.

Sebastian

Salapaka

. Design methodologies for robust nano-positioning. IEEE T Contr Syst T 2005; 13: 868–876.

15.

Sumeet

Santosh

Moheimani

SOR

. High-bandwidth control of a piezoelectric nanopositioning stage in the presence of plant uncertainties. Nanotechnology 2008; 19: 125503.

16.

Chang-Qing

Ya-Peng

. Optimal control of active structures with piezoelectric modal sensors and actuators. Smart Mater Struct 1997; 6: 403–409.

17.

Zou

. Iterative control approach to compensate for both the hysteresis and the dynamics effects of piezo actuators. IEEE T Contr Syst T 2007; 15: 936–944.

18.

Huang

Venkataramanan

et al . Extreme precise motion tracking of piezoelectric positioning stage using sampled-data iterative learning control. IEEE T Contr Syst T 2013; 21: 1432–1439.

19.

Shieh

Huang

. Precise tracking of a piezoelectric positioning stage via a filtering-type sliding-surface control with chattering alleviation. IET Control Theory A 2007; 1: 586–594.

20.

. Adaptive sliding mode control with perturbation estimation and PID sliding surface for motion tracking of a piezo-driven micromanipulator. IEEE T Contr Syst T 2010; 18: 798–810.

21.

Man

. Terminal sliding mode control design for uncertain dynamic systems. Syst Control Lett 1998; 34: 281–287.

22.

Feng

Man

. Non-singular terminal sliding mode control of rigid manipulators. Automatica 2002; 38: 2159–2167.

23.

Xinghuo

Man

. Fast terminal sliding-mode control design for nonlinear dynamical systems. IEEE T Circuits: I 2002; 49: 261–264.

24.

Chuntao

Yonghong

. A neural networks model for hysteresis nonlinearity. Sensors Actuat A: Phys 2004; 112: 49–54.

25.

Ahn

Kha

. Internal model control for shape memory alloy actuators using fuzzy based Preisach model. Sensors Actuat A: Phys 2007; 136: 730–741.

26.

Wang

Liu

Shi

. Observer-based fuzzy adaptive output-feedback control of stochastic nonlinear multiple time-delay systems. IEEE T Cybernetics 2017; 47: 2568–2578.

27.

Zhao

Yang

Xia

et al . Adaptive fuzzy hierarchical sliding mode control for a class of MIMO nonlinear time-delay systems with input saturation. IEEE T Fuzzy Syst 2017; 47: 2568–2578.

28.

Tai

Ahn

. A RBF neural network sliding mode controller for SMA actuator. Int J Control Autom 2011; 8: 1296–1305.

29.

. Radial basis function neural network control of an XY micropositioning stage without exact dynamic model. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics, Singapore, 14–17 July 2009. New York: IEEE.

30.

Wang

Shi

et al . Adaptive neural tracking control for a class of nonlinear systems with dynamic uncertainties. IEEE T Cybernetics 2017; 47: 3075–3087.

31.

Wang

Sun

Liu

. Adaptive intelligent control of nonaffine nonlinear time-delay systems with dynamic uncertainties. IEEE T Syst Man Cy: S 2017; 47: 1474–1485.

32.

H-C

Chuang

C-Y

Yeh

M-F

. Design of a hybrid adaptive CMAC with supervisory controller for a class of nonlinear system. Neurocomputing 2009; 72: 1920–1933.

33.

Yang

Yan

. Trajectory tracking for robotic airships using sliding mode control based on neural network approximation and fuzzy gain scheduling. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering 2015; 230: 184–196.

34.

Yang

Niu

et al . High-bandwidth control of nanopositioning stages via an inner-loop delayed position feedback. IEEE T Autom Sci Eng 2015; 12: 1357–1368.

35.

Tokat

Eksin

Güzelkaya

. A new design method for sliding mode controllers using a linear time-varying sliding surface. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering 2002; 216: 455–466.

36.

Eksin

Güzelkaya

Tokat

. Self-tuning mechanism for sliding surface slope adjustment in fuzzy sliding mode controllers. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering 2002; 216: 393–406.

37.

Roopaei

Balas

. Adaptive gain sliding mode control in uncertain MIMO systems. In: Proceedings of the 2009 3rd international workshop on soft computing applications, Arad, 29 July–1 August 2009, pp.77–82. New York: IEEE.

38.

Roopaei

Jahromi

Jafari

. Adaptive gain fuzzy sliding mode control for the synchronization of nonlinear chaotic gyros. Chaos 2009; 19: 013125.

39.

Saghafinia

Ping

Uddin

et al . Adaptive fuzzy sliding-mode control into chattering-free IM drive. IEEE T Ind Appl 2015; 51: 692–701.

40.

Vyshnevsky

Kovalev

Wischnewskiy

. A novel, single-mode piezoceramic plate actuator for ultrasonic linear motors. IEEE T Ultrason Ferr 2005; 52: 2047–2053.

41.

Mohan

Undeland

Robbins

. Power electronics: converters, applications, and design. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1989.

42.

Yao

. Modeling and analysis of stick-slip motion in a linear piezoelectric ultrasonic motor considering ultrasonic oscillation effect. Int J Mech Sci 2016; 107: 215–224.

43.

Albus

. A new approach to manipulator control: the cerebellar model articulation controller (CMAC). J Dyn Syst 1975; 97: 220–227.

44.

Peng

Y-F

Lin

C-M

. Adaptive recurrent cerebellar model articulation controller for linear ultrasonic motor with optimal learning rates. Neurocomputing 2007; 70: 2626–2637.

45.

Jin

Lee

Ahn

. Continuous nonsingular terminal sliding-mode control of shape memory alloy actuators using time delay estimation. IEEE: ASME T Mech 2015; 20: 899–909.

46.

Slotine

. Applied nonlinear control. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1991.

47.

Shirinzadeh

et al . Continuous finite-time control for robotic manipulators with terminal sliding mode. Automatica 2005; 41: 1957–1964.

48.

Zou

Kumar

Hou

et al . Finite-time attitude tracking control for spacecraft using terminal sliding mode and chebyshev neural betwork. IEEE T Syst Man Cy B 2011; 41: 950–963.

49.

Plestan

Shtessel

Brégeault

et al . New methodologies for adaptive sliding mode control. Int J Control 2010; 83: 1907–1919.

50.

Lee

Utkin

. Chattering suppression methods in sliding mode control systems. Annu Rev Control 2007; 31: 179–188.

51.

Ahn

. Speed control of a hydraulic pressure coupling drive using an adaptive fuzzy sliding-mode control. IEEE: ASME T Mech 2012; 17: 976–986.

52.

Burton

Zinober

ASI

. Continuous approximation of variable structure control. Int J Syst Sci 1986; 17: 875–885.

53.

Hilton

et al . Adaptive sliding-mode control for nonlinear active suspension vehicle systems using TS fuzzy approach. IEEE T Indus Electron 2013; 60: 3328–3338.

54.

Zhang

Yan

Zhang

. Robust adaptive backstepping control for piezoelectric nano-manipulating systems. Mech Syst Sig Pr 2017; 83: 130–148.