Design and analysis of an integrated sliding mode control–two-point wheelbase preview strategy for a semi-active air suspension with stepper motor-driven gas-filled adjustable shock absorber

Abstract

This article proposes an integrated sliding mode control–two-point wheelbase preview strategy for semi-active air suspension system with gas-filled adjustable shock absorber. First of all, a vehicle suspension model with rolling lobe air spring and gas-filled adjustable shock absorber is built, following with a road input model for the front wheel. By describing the detailed structure and working process of the gas-filled adjustable shock absorber, the regulating mechanism between the stepper motor and the designed gas-filled adjustable shock absorber is established. Subsequently, the sliding mode control algorithm is applied to generate the desired damping force with the real-time state of the vehicle. Moreover, to predetermine the road profile for the rear wheel, a two-point wheelbase preview approach is proposed and its superiority is also illustrated as compared with the conventional single-point wheelbase preview approach. To evaluate the performance of the proposed system, numerical analysis is conducted with other three comparative schemes, namely, passive suspension system, active suspension system with H infinity control, and sliding mode control–controlled semi-active air suspension system with adjustable shock absorber. Simulation results show that the integrated sliding mode control–two-point wheelbase preview strategy can be successfully utilized in the semi-active air suspension system with stepper motor-driven gas-filled adjustable shock absorber, and the vehicle performance with the proposed system can be greatly improved.

Keywords

Semi-active air suspension gas-filled adjustable shock absorber sliding-mode control multi-point wheelbase preview

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Mihai

Andronic

. Behavior of a semi-active suspension system versus a passive suspension system on an uneven road surface. Mechanika 2014; 20: 64–69.

Alonso

Gimenez

Nieto

et al . Air suspension characterisation and effectiveness of a variable area orifice. Vehicle Syst Dyn 2010; 48: 271–286.

Kim

Lee

. Height and leveling control of automotive air suspension system using sliding mode approach. IEEE T Veh Technol 2011; 60: 2027–2041.

Sun

Yuan

Cai

et al . Model predictive control of an air suspension system with damping multi-mode switching damper based on hybrid model. Mech Syst Signal Pr 2017; 94: 94–110.

Smith

Zhang

. Hydraulically interconnected vehicle suspension: optimization and sensitivity analysis. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2010; 224: 1335–1355.

Zhang

Smith

Jeyakumaran

. Hydraulically interconnected vehicle suspension: background and modeling. Vehicle Syst Dyn 2010; 48: 17–40.

Tang

Sun

et al . Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy control for semi-active vehicle suspension with a magnetorheological damper and experimental validation. IEEE/ASME T Mech 2017; 22: 291–300.

Weber

. Semi-active vibration absorber based on real-time controlled MR damper. Mech Syst Signal Pr 2014; 46: 272–288.

Zhang

. Semi-active control of an integrated full-car suspension with seat suspension and driver body model using ER dampers. Int J Vehicle Des 2013; 63: 159–184.

10.

Qin

Zhao

Wang

et al . Comprehensive analysis for influence of controllable damper time delay on semi-active suspension control strategies. J Vib Acoust 2017; 139: 031006.

11.

Kashem

Ektesabi

Nagarajah

. Comparison between different sets of suspension parameters and introduction of new modified skyhook control strategy incorporating varying road condition. Vehicle Syst Dyn 2012; 50: 1173–1190.

12.

Viet

Nghi

Hieu

et al . On a combination of ground-hook controllers for semi-active tuned mass dampers. J Mech Sci Technol 2014; 28: 2059–2064.

13.

Priyandoko

Mailah

Jamaluddin

. Vehicle active suspension system using skyhook adaptive neuro active force control. Mech Syst Signal Pr 2009; 23: 855–868.

14.

Xie

Wong

Zhao

et al . A noise-insensitive semi-active air suspension for heavy-duty vehicles with an integrated fuzzy-wheelbase preview control. Math Probl Eng 2013; 2013: 121953-1–121953-12.

15.

Zapateiro

Luo

Karimi

et al . Vibration control of a class of semiactive suspension system using neural network and backstepping techniques. Mech Syst Signal Pr 2009; 23: 1946–1953.

16.

Dong

Liao

et al . Comparative research on semi-active control strategies for magneto-rheological suspension. Nonlinear Dynam 2010; 59: 433–453.

17.

Guo

. Neural network control for a semi-active vehicle suspension with a magnetorheological damper. J Vib Control 2004; 10: 461–471.

18.

Canale

Milanese

Novara

. Semi-active suspension control using “fast” model-predictive techniques. IEEE T Contr Syst T 2006; 14: 1034–1046.

19.

Hung

Gao

Hung

. Variable structure control: a survey. IEEE T Ind Electron 1993; 40: 2–22.

20.

Lin

. Stable indirect adaptive type-2 fuzzy sliding mode control using Lyapunov approach. Int J Innov Comput I 2010; 6: 5725–5747.

21.

Hilton

et al . Adaptive sliding-mode control for nonlinear active suspension vehicle systems using T-S fuzzy approach. IEEE T Ind Electron 2013; 60: 3328–3338.

22.

Qin

Langari

Wang

et al . Road excitation classification for semi-active suspension system with deep neural networks. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 2017; 33: 1907–1918.

23.

Gohrle

Schindler

Wagner

et al . Design and vehicle implementation of preview active suspension controllers. IEEE T Contr Syst T 2014; 22: 1135–1142.

24.

Louam

Wilson

Sharp

. Optimal control of a vehicle suspension incorporating the time delay between front and rear wheel inputs. Vehicle Syst Dyn 1988; 17: 317–336.

25.

ElMadany

. Control and evaluation of slow-active suspensions with preview for a full car. Math Probl Eng 2012; 2012: 375080-1–375080-19.

26.

Lam

Cheung

. Multi-objective control for active vehicle suspension with wheelbase preview. J Sound Vib 2014; 333: 5269–5282.

27.

Youn

Tchamna

Lee

et al . Preview suspension control for a full tracked vehicle. Int J Automot Techn 2014; 15: 399–410.

28.

Wong

Xie

Zhao

et al . Analysis of automotive rolling lobe air spring under alternative factors with finite element model. J Mech Sci Technol 2014; 28: 5069–5081.

29.

Frank

. Fluid mechanics. 3rd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011.

30.

Sun

Gao

Kaynak

. Finite frequency H-infinity control for vehicle active suspension systems. IEEE T Contr Syst T 2011; 19: 416–422.

31.

Chen

Guo

. Constrained H_∞ control of active suspensions: an LMI approach. IEEE T Contr Syst T 2005; 13: 412–421.

32.

Zhang

. H_∞ control of active vehicle suspensions with actuator time delay. J Sound Vib 2007; 301: 236–252.

33.

Wang

Dong

Qin

et al . Suspension system state estimation using adaptive Kalman filtering based on road classification. Vehicle Syst Dyn 2017; 55: 371–398.