Admixed recurrent Gegenbauer polynomials neural network with mended particle swarm optimization control system for synchronous reluctance motor driving continuously variable transmission system
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2020
Admixed recurrent Gegenbauer polynomials neural network with mended particle swarm optimization control system for synchronous reluctance motor driving continuously variable transmission system
To cut down influence of nonlinear time-varying uncertainty action in a synchronous reluctance motor driving continuously variable transmission system, an admixed recurrent Gegenbauer polynomials neural network with mended particle swarm optimization control system is posed for improving control performance. The admixed recurrent Gegenbauer polynomials neural network with mended particle swarm optimization control system involves an observer control, a recurrent Gegenbauer polynomial neural network control and a remunerated control. The weights of recurrent Gegenbauer polynomials neural network controller are regulated by using the adaptive law and the gradient descent technology. The remunerated control with a reckoned law is derived and computed by means of the Lyapunov stability theorem so as to pledge stability of the control system. Likewise, to speedup convergence of weights in the recurrent Gegenbauer polynomial neural network, the mended particle swarm optimization algorithm is used for regulating two kinds of learning rates. At last, three kinds of experimental results are demonstrated to confirm the usefulness of the put forward control system with comparative studies.
ChaiWZhaoWKwonB.Optimal design of wound field synchronous reluctance machines to improve torque by increasing the saliency ratio. IEEE Trans Magnet2017; 53(11): 8206604.
2.
ArtetxeGParedesJPrietoB, et al. Optimal pole number and winding designs for low speed-high torque synchronous reluctance machines. Energies2018; 11(1): 128.
3.
MatsuoTAntablyAELipoTA.A new control strategy for optimum-efficiency operation of a synchronous reluctance motor. IEEE Trans Ind Appl1997; 33(5): 1146–1153.
4.
RashadEMRadwanTSRahmanMA. A maximum torque per ampere vector control strategy for synchronous reluctance motors considering saturation and iron losses. In: Industry applications conference, Seattle, WA, 3–7 October 2004, pp.2411–2417. New York: IEEE.
5.
GuzzellaLSchmidAM.Feedback linearization of spark-ignition engines with continuously variable transmissions. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol1995; 3(1): 54–58.
6.
KimWVachtsevanosG. Fuzzy logic ratio control for a CVT hydraulic module. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on intelligent control, Patras, 19 July 2000, pp.151–156. New York: IEEE.
7.
TsengCYLueYFLinYT, et al. Dynamic simulation model for hybrid electric scooters. In: International symposium on industrial electronics, Seoul, South Korea, 5–8 July 2009, pp.1464–1469. New York: IEEE.
8.
LinCH.Adaptive recurrent Chebyshev neural network control for permanent magnet synchronous motor servo-drive electric scooter. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2014; 228(9): 699–714.
9.
YaoZYuYYaoJ.Artificial neural network–based internal leakage fault detection for hydraulic actuators: an experimental investigation. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2017; 232(4): 369–382.
10.
LiuT.System modeling and instability control of wind turbine blade based on hydraulic pitch system and radial basic function neural network proportional-integral-derivative controller. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2018; 232(10): 1412–1428.
11.
LinCH.A PMSM driven electric scooter system with V-belt continuously variable transmission using novel hybrid modified recurrent Legendre neural network control. J Power Electron2015; 15(1): 220–229.
12.
LinCH.A backstepping control of LSM drive systems using adaptive modified recurrent Laguerre OPNNUO. J Power Electron2016; 16(2): 598–609.
13.
TingJCChenDF.Nonlinear backstepping control of SynRM drive systems using reformed recurrent Hermite polynomial neural networks with adaptive law and error estimated law. J Power Electron2018; 18(5): 1380–1397.
14.
TingJCChenDF.SynRM servo-drive CVT systems using MRRHPNN control with mend ACO. J Power Electron2018; 18(5): 1409–1423.
15.
WuCZhangHFangT.Flutter analysis of an airfoil with bounded random parameters in incompressible flow via Gegenbauer polynomial approximation. Aero Sci Technol2007; 11(7–8): 518–526.
16.
ZhangYLiW.Gegenbauer neural network and its weights-direct determination method. IET Electron Lett2009; 45(23): 1184–1185.
17.
LinCH.A six-phase CRIM driving CVT using blend modified recurrent Gegenbauer OPNN Control. J Power Electron2016; 16(4): 1438–1454.
18.
LinCH.Comparative dynamic control for continuously variable transmission with nonlinear uncertainty using blend amend recurrent Gegenbauer-functional-expansions neural network. Nonlin Dyn2017; 87(3): 1467–1493.
19.
LinCHYuCY. Blend recurrent Gegenbauer OPNNAPSO control for a SynRM servo-drive CVT system. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE conference on industrial electronics and applications (ICIEA), Wuhan, China, 31 May–2 June 2018, pp.1060–1065. New York: IEEE.
20.
KennedyJEberhartR.Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of international conference on neural networks (ICNN’95), Perth, WA, Australia, 27–November–1 December 1995, pp.1942–1948. New York: IEEE.
21.
ClercMKennedyJ.The particle swarm—explosion, stability, and convergence in a multi-dimensional complex space. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput2002; 6(1): 58–73.
22.
ShiYEberhartRC.A modified particle swarm optimizer. In: International conference on evolutionary computation proceedings: IEEE world congress on computational intelligence, Anchorage, AK, 4–9 May 1998, pp.69–73. New York: IEEE.
23.
AkbariRZiaratiK.A rank based particle swarm optimization algorithm with dynamic adaptation. J Comput Appl Math2010; 235(8): 2694–2714.
24.
LinCH.Composite recurrent Laguerre orthogonal polynomials neural network dynamic control for continuously variable transmission system using altered particle swarm optimization. Nonlin Dyn2015; 81(3): 1219–1245.
25.
MaheswariCPriyankaEBMeenakshipriyaB.Fractional-order PIλDµ controller tuned by coefficient diagram method and particle swarm optimization algorithms for SO2 emission control process. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2017; 231(8): 587–599.
26.
AstromKJHagglundT.PID controller: theory, design, and tuning. Durham, NC: Instrument Society of America (Research Triangle Park), 1995.
27.
HagglundTAstromKJ. “Revisiting the Ziegler-Nichols tuning rules for PI control.” Asian Journal of Control2002; 4(4): 364–380.
28.
HagglundTAstromKJ.Revisiting the Ziegler-Nichols tuning rules for PI control-part II: the frequency response method. Asian J Contr2004; 6(4): 469–482.
AstromKJWittenmarkB.Adaptive control. New York: Addison Wesley, 1995.
31.
LewisFLCamposJSelmicR.Neuro-fuzzy control of industrial systems with actuator nonlinearities. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM Frontiers in Applied Mathematics, 2002.
