Robust steering control for trajectory following in road traffic environments

Abstract

The process of modelling vehicle motion in a road traffic environment requires the integration of trajectory generation with vehicle control. The steps involved here are generating a feasible trajectory based on the existing traffic and tracking the trajectory to control it with a steering angle input. Since the parameters of a physical system vary with changes in operating conditions, it is important to consider robustness when designing controllers. This article aims at developing a trajectory-following model with robust steering control strategies to accurately follow a generated trajectory. In this study, performance-based proportional, robust proportional and sliding mode control strategies are designed for trajectory following. The robustness of the proportional controller is established using Kharitonov’s theorem, which is compared with a proportional controller tuned for performance. Sliding mode control is designed for robustness and chattering elimination using two kinds of reaching laws – a constant reaching law and a novel power rate exponential reaching law. The controllers are designed using a dynamic bicycle model considering the error with respect to the trajectory. The controllers are then evaluated in IPG CarMaker®. The resulting trajectories and control inputs are compared for the considered control methodologies using the ISO double lane change and the Slalom tests. Sliding mode control with power rate exponential reaching law is concluded to be more robust as compared to the other controllers, with lower response times, up to 84% lower heading angle deviations from the trajectory and an overshoot of only 3.2% in lane changing.

Keywords

Trajectory tracking robust control design sliding mode control vehicle control autonomous vehicles

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Global status report on road safety 2018: summary. Technical report, World Health Organization, Geneva, 2018.

Road accidents in India – 2018. Technical report, Transport Research Wing, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India, New Delhi, India, September 2019.

Yang

Zheng

Wen

, et al. A dynamic lane-changing trajectory planning model for automated vehicles. Transport Res C: Emer 2018; 95: 228–247.

Deshpande

Amrutsamanvar

Subramanian

SC.

Vehicle path generation and tracking in mixed road traffic. IFAC PapersOnline 2020; 53(1): 524–529.

Marino

Scalzi

Netto

Nested PID steering control for lane keeping in autonomous vehicles. Control Eng Pract 2011; 19(12): 1459–1467.

Emirler

Wang

Aksun Gven

, et al. Automated robust path following control based on calculation of lateral deviation and yaw angle error. In: ASME 2015 dynamic systems and control conference, Columbus, OH, 28–30 October 2015.

Huang

Wang

YJ.

Robust PID tuning strategy for uncertain plants based on the Kharitonov theorem. ISA T 2000; 39(4): 419–431.

Kharitonov

VL.

Asymptotic stability of an equilibrium position of a family of systems of linear differential equations. Differ Equat 1978; 14: 2086–2088.

Lee

Chang

HJ.

Analysis of explicit model predictive control for path-following control. PLoS ONE 2018; 13(3): 1–19.

10.

Tashiro

. Vehicle steering control with MPC for target trajectory tracking of autonomous reverse parking. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on control applications (CCA), Hyderabad, India, 28–30 August 2013, pp. 247–251. New York: IEEE.

11.

Yang

Liu

, et al. A linear time-varying MPC method for vehicle path-following assistance based on steering torque. In: IECON 2017 – 43rd annual conference of the IEEE industrial electronics society, Beijing, China, 29 October–1 November 2017, pp.4559–4564. New York: IEEE.

12.

Huang

Naghdy

Sliding mode predictive tracking control for uncertain steer-by-wire system. Control Eng Pract 2019; 85: 194–205.

13.

Gao

Hung

JC.

Variable structure control of nonlinear systems: a new approach. IEEE T Ind Electron 1993; 40(1): 45–55.

14.

Guldner

Utkin

Ackermann

, et al. Sliding mode control for active steering of cars. IFAC P Vol 1995; 28(1): 61–66.

15.

Zhang

Rachid

. Sliding mode controller for automatic steering of vehicles. In: IECON’01: 27th annual conference of the IEEE industrial electronics society (Cat. No.37243), vol. 3, Denver, CO, 29 November–2 December 2001, pp.2149–2153. New York: IEEE.

16.

Zhang

Ren

. Lateral control of vehicle for lane keeping in intelligent transportation systems. In: 2009 international conference on intelligent human-machine systems and cybernetics, vol. 1, Hangzhou, China, 26–27 August 2009, pp.446–450. New York: IEEE.

17.

Tan

Guo

, et al. Sliding-mode control of four wheel steering systems. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on mechatronics and automation (ICMA), Takamatsu, Japan, 6–9 August 2017, pp.1250–1255. New York: IEEE.

18.

Soudbakhsh

Eskandarian

Comparison of linear and non-linear controllers for active steering of vehicles in evasive manoeuvres. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering 2012; 226(2): 215–232.

19.

Lei

Yang

, et al. Sliding mode lane keeping control based on separation of translation and rotation movement. Optik 2016; 127(10): 4369–4374.

20.

Solea

Nunes

Trajectory planning and sliding-mode control based trajectory-tracking for cybercars. Integr Comput-Aid E 2007; 14(1): 33–47.

21.

Alcal

Sellart

Puig

, et al. Comparison of two non-linear model-based control strategies for autonomous vehicles. In 2016 24th Mediterranean conference on control and automation (MED), Athens, 21–24 June 2016, pp.846–851. New York: IEEE.

22.

Kachroo

Tomizuka

Chattering reduction and error convergence in the sliding-mode control of a class of nonlinear systems. IEEE T Automatic Control 1996; 41(7): 1063–1068.

23.

Burton

Zinober

ASI

. Continuous approximation of variable structure control. Int J Syst Sci 1986; 17(6): 875–885.

24.

Norouzi

Kazemi

Azadi

Vehicle lateral control in the presence of uncertainty for lane change maneuver using adaptive sliding mode control with fuzzy boundary layer. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering 2018; 232(1): 12–28.

25.

Devika

Thomas

. Sliding mode controller design for MIMO nonlinear systems: a novel power rate reaching law approach for improved performance. J Frankl Inst 2018; 355(12): 5082–5098.

26.

Tan

KK.

Autonomous reverse parking system based on robust path generation and improved sliding mode control. IEEE T Intell Transp 2015; 16(3): 1225–1237.

27.

Devika

Thomas

Power rate exponential reaching law for enhanced performance of sliding mode control. Int J Control Autom 2017; 15: 2636–2645.

28.

Amrutsamanvar

Vanajakshi

. Modeling path choice behavior of powered-two-wheelers in disordered heterogeneous traffic. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.

29.

Rajamani

Vehicle dynamics and control (Mechanical Engineering Series). Boston, MA: Springer, 2011.

30.

Deshpande

Lane keeping and lane changing system for passenger car. Technical report, The Automotive Research Association of India (ARAI), Pune, India, 2017.

31.

Gillespie

TD.

Fundamentals of vehicle dynamics. Warrendale, PA: SAE International, 1992.

32.

Slotine

Applied nonlinear control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1991.

33.

ISO 3888-1:2018. Passenger cars Test track for a severe lane-change manoeuvre Part 1: double lane-change.

34.

ISO 18375:2016. Heavy commercial vehicles and buses Test method for yaw stability Sine with dwell test.