This study analyses recent changes in collective bargaining institutions and their implications for employer strategies in the French and German telecommunications industries, drawing on case studies and survey data from call centre workplaces. Findings demonstrate that differences in both formal institutions and past logics of action influenced actor responses to changing markets and ownership structures. French trade unions were more successful in establishing encompassing bargaining structures and reducing pressures for pay differentiation, due to state support for the mandatory extension of agreements and unions’ strategic focus on centralizing bargaining. In contrast, bargaining in Germany has become increasingly fragmented and decentralized as unions and works councils focused on company-level bargaining at major employers. This focus allowed worker representatives to preserve their strong influence over employment practices in core workplaces but has contributed to declining bargaining coverage and growing wage inequality.
Amadieu, J.-F. ( 1995) ‘Industrial Relations: Is France a Special Case?’ , British Journal of Industrial Relations33(3): 345-51.
2.
Batt, R. and Nohara, H. ( 2009) ‘How Institutions and Business Strategies Affect Wages: A Cross National Study of Call Centres’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review62(4): 533-52.
3.
Batt, R., Holman, D. and Holtgrewe, U.(2009) ‘The Globalization of Service Work: Comparative International Evidence from Call Centers’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review62(4): 453-88.
4.
Bosch, G. and Weinkopf, C. (eds) (2008) Low Wage Work in Germany. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
5.
Caroli, E. and Gautie, J. (eds) (2008) Low-Wage Work in France. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
6.
Doellgast, V. ( 2008) ‘Collective Bargaining and High Involvement Management in Comparative Perspective: Evidence from US and German Call Centers’ , Industrial Relations47(2): 284-319.
7.
Doellgast, V. ( 2009) ‘Still a Coordinated Model? Market Liberalization and the Transformation of Employment Relations in the German Telecommunications Industry’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review63(1): 3-23.
8.
Doellgast, V. and Greer, I. ( 2007) ‘Vertical Disintegration and the Disorganization of German Industrial Relations’, British Journal of Industrial Relations45(1): 55-76.
9.
Goyer, M. ( 2006) ‘Varieties of Institutional Investors and National Models of Capitalism: The Transformation of Corporate Governance in France and Germany’, Politics and Society34(3): 399-430.
10.
Gumbrell-McCormick, R. and Hyman, R. ( 2006) ‘Embedded Collectivism? Workplace Representation in France and Germany’, Industrial Relations Journal37(5): 473-91.
11.
Hall, P.A. and Soskice, D. (eds) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
12.
Hancké, B., Rhodes, M. and Thatcher, M. (eds) ( 2008) Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions, and Complementarities in the European Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
Holtgrewe, U. ( 2006) Flexible Menschen in flexiblen Organisationen: Bedingungen und Möglichkeiten kreativen und innovativen Handelns. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
14.
Matuschek, I., Arnold, K. and Voss, G.G. ( 2007) Subjektivierte Taylorisierung: Organisation und Praxis medienvermittelter Dienstleistungsarbeit. Munich: Reiner Hampp Verlag.
15.
Maurice, M. and Sorge, A. (eds) (2000) Embedding Organizations: Societal Analysis of Actors, Organizations and Socio-economic Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
16.
Maurice, M., Sellier, F. and Silvestre, J.-J. ( 1986) The Social Foundations of Industrial Power. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
Mias, A. ( 2008) ‘La configuration européenne d’une branche : les télécommunications’, in A. Jobert (ed.) Les nouveaux cadres du dialogues social. Europe et territoires, pp. 129-87. Brussels: P.I.E. Peter Lang.
18.
Reynaud, E. and Reynaud, J.-D. ( 1996) ‘La régulation des marchés internes du travail’, Revue Française de Sociologie37: 337-68.
19.
Sako, M. and Jackson, G. ( 2006) ‘Strategy Meets Institutions: The Transformation of Labor Relations at Deutsche Telekom and NTT’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review59(3): 347-66.
20.
Schmidt, V.A. ( 2004) ‘French Capitalism Transformed, Yet Still a Third Variety of Capitalism’, Economy and Society32(4): 526-54.
21.
Sorge, A. ( 1991) ‘Strategic Fit and the Societal Effect: Interpreting Cross-National Comparisons of Technology, Organization and Human Resources’ , Organization Studies12(2): 161-90.
22.
SUD and CGC (2008) ‘Observatoire du Stress et des Mobilités Forcées - France Télécom’ , available online at: [http://www.observatoiredustressft.org/ ].
23.
Théry, L. (ed.) (2006) Le travail intenable. Résister collectivement à l’intensification du travail. Paris: La Découverte .
