Abstract
To evaluate whether proxies that record surface, near-surface, and bottom water conditions from the North Iceland shelf have similar trends and periodicities, we examine Holocene century-scale paleoceanographic records from core MD99-2269. This core site lies close to the boundary between Atlantic and Arctic/Polar waters, and in an area frequently influenced by drift ice. The proxies are stable δ13C and δ18O values on planktonic and benthic foraminifera, alkenone-based sea-surface temperatures (SST°C), and foraminiferal Mg/Ca SST°C and bottom water temperature (BWT°C) estimates. These data were converted to equi-spaced 60-year time-series; significant trends were extracted using Singular Spectrum Analysis, which accounted for between 50% and 70% of the variance. In order to evaluate within-site ocean climate variability, a comparison between these data and previously published proxies from MD99-2269 was carried out on a standardized data set of 14 proxies covering the interval 400–9200 cal. yr BP. Principal component (PC) analysis indicated that the first two PC axes accounted for 57% of the variability with high loadings primarily defining ‘nutrient’ and ‘temperature’ proxies. Fuzzy k-mean clustering of the 14 climate proxies indicated major environmental changes at ~6350 and ~3450 cal. yr BP, which define local early-, middle-, and late-Holocene climatic shifts. Our results indicate that the major control on the combined proxy signal is the Holocene decrease in June insolation, but regional changes in such factors as sea-ice extent and salinity are required to explain the threefold division of the Holocene.
Keywords
Introduction
The steep oceanographic gradients across the North Iceland shelf (Belkin et al., 2009; Stefansson, 1962, 1969) (Figure 1) have made it a target for the study of North Atlantic ocean climate change since the last deglaciation (Andersen et al., 2004; Moros et al., 2006; Sicre et al., 2008). We define ‘ocean climate’ as the average sea-surface and seafloor temperature, salinity, and geochemistry through a seasonal cycle, and the extent and duration of drift ice. The area of interest (Figures 1 and 2) lies along the North Iceland Front (Belkin et al., 2009), the west–east marine frontal system, which demarcates the boundary between sea-ice-bearing Arctic and Polar waters to the north, and the Atlantic waters carried with the warm North Iceland Irminger Current (NIIC) on the inner and mid-shelf (Figure 1). Changes in the ocean climate around Iceland influence the climate of Iceland (Olafsson, 1999) and are representative of changes in the wider North Atlantic (Dickson et al., 1988). On the North Iceland margin, studies of cores B997-321, B997-330, MD99-2263, MD99-2264, MD99-2266, MD99-2269, MD99-2275, and JR51GC35 (Figure 2) (e.g. Bendle and Rosell-Mele, 2007; Eiriksson et al., 2004; Knudsen et al., 2004; Moossen et al., 2015; Olafsdottir et al., 2010; Sicre et al., 2008) have also increased our knowledge of changes in ocean climate during the Holocene. Published records from MD99-2269 include information on coccoliths (Giraudeau et al., 2004, 2010), diatoms (Andersen et al., 2004), dinocysts (Solignac et al., 2006), foraminifera (Giraudeau et al., 2004; Justwan et al., 2008; Kristjánsdóttir et al., 2007a), quartz and calcite percentage data (Moros et al., 2006; Stoner et al., 2007) (Table 1, Figure 3), and sediments (Andrews et al., 2003). Thus, a large number of proxies have been utilized to develop time-series of oceanographic change at the sea surface/near-surface as well as at the seafloor for this critical core site (Table 1). Several of these records are available from the NOAA Paleoclimate Data base (http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/paleoclimatology-data/datasets). Furthermore, all our new data have been added to the Pangaea Data Base (Kristjánsdóttir et al., in preparation: doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.847657, see Appendix).

(a) February temperature (2008) at 50 m in Iceland waters (01 February 2008–14 February 2008). The red dashed lines indicate the hydrographic sections surveyed by the Iceland Marine Institute; also shown are 2014 February temperatures along the (b) Hornbanki and (c) Siglunes hydrographic sections (http://www.hafro.is/Sjora/) showing NIIC waters overlying cold Arctic/Polar water in the deep troughs. Filled square in A and B represents the site of MD99-2269 (Figure 2).

Plot of the location of MD99-2269 and other cores mentioned in this paper. The average April location of the sea-ice margin AD 1870–1920 is shown as a heavy dashed black line (http://nsidc.org/data/gis/data.html). Location of hydrographic sections Siglunes (S) and Hornbanki (H) are shown with a dashed pink line (see Figure 1).
The 14 proxies and references for core MD99-2269. Arranged from bottom waters to surface waters.
SST°C: sea-surface temperature.
Number of samples.

Objectives and organization
Regional comparisons tend to ignore the question of the variability between proxies that record processes active at different seasons and locations with the water column. Our paper is only concerned with the Holocene records from MD99-2269 (Table 1, Figures 1 and 2), and our goal is to investigate whether there are indeed any common trends and periodicities in proxies that respond to changes in surface, near-surface, and seafloor ocean climate. As Li et al. (2010) noted, the analysis of multi-proxy data from a single core has the advantage that temporal synchronization of the records is assured (e.g. Blaauw, 2012; Torbenson et al., 2015).
We first present our Holocene geochemical proxy data from surface, near-surface, and benthic organisms (Figure 3); we then combine this information with existing published proxies (Table 1, Figure 3) to answer the following questions: (1) are there significant trends and periodicities in the new proxy records, (2) are these trends and periodicities similar to those from previously published proxies for this one core site (e.g. Figure 3), and (3) do the combined data show any consistent patterns in terms of identifying major regime shifts in Holocene?
Core site and background
Core MD99-2269 was retrieved in Húnaflóadjúp in 365 m of water (66°37.53′N and −20°51.15′W; Figure 1), and recovered 25.4 m of sediment (Labeyrie et al., 2003). The site of this giant Calypso core MD99-2269 (Figure 2) (Labeyrie et al., 2003) was chosen based on the B997-seismic and coring program (Helgadottir, 1997). Sub-bottom profiles indicated that this trough contained a thick, drift-like sediment unit (Andrews, 2007; Helgadottir, 1997), with several distinct parallel reflectors that record major tephra events, including the Saksunarvatn tephra at ~22-m core depth (Andrews et al., 2002; Kristjánsdóttir et al., 2007b).
Oceanography of the area
MD99-2269 lies between two of the hydrographic sections that the Iceland Marine Institute occupies (http://www.hafro.is/Sjora/) – the Hornbanki (H) section to the west and the Siglunes (S) section to the east (Figure 2). Figure 1a illustrates the potential February temperature at 50-m depth, and Figure 1b and c shows the temperature profiles for the two sections in February 2014. The NIIC is a surface to intermediate depth Atlantic Water current, which overlies cold upper Arctic Intermediate Water (UAIW) (potential temperature < 0°C) in the troughs (Figure 1b and c). This cold water mass (<0°C) is present in all of the deep North Iceland troughs and the hydrographic sections indicate that it is generally present at water depths of ⩾350–400 m. MD99-2269 lies close to the boundary between UAIW and the overlying cooled Atlantic Water (Figure 1b and c). In winter (Feb) there is little vertical variation in potential density, but the water column becomes more stratified during the summer months.
The sensitivity of the ocean climate of North Iceland is readily seen in the composite temperature and salinity records from the section (Figure 2) (Olafsson, 1999), which illustrates the impact of salinity excursions (i.e. the Great Salinity Anomaly of 1969 (Dickson et al., 1988; Malmberg, 1969, 1985) and the 1980s salinity anomaly (Belkin et al., 1998)). This sensitivity is further illustrated by the location of the MD99-2269, close to, but south of the average, April 15% sea-ice concentration AD 1870–1920, which is used as a measure of the position of the sea-ice edge (Divine and Dick, 2006) (http://nsidc.org/data/gis/data.html) (Figure 2). Icebergs and sea ice extend southward of this average sea-ice edge and in extreme years strand on the coast. Variations in the extent of drift ice from the time of the Settlement AD 870 have been reconstructed from historical data (Koch, 1945; Ogilvie, 1996; Ogilvie et al., 2000; Wallevik and Sigurjonsson, 1998). Periodic transport of sediment-bearing drift ice to the north Iceland shelf is shown by the presence of allochtonous quartz (Moros et al., 2006) (Figure 3), the sea-ice biomarker IP25 (in MD99-2275, Figure 2) (Masse et al., 2008), and FeO grains sourced to sites within the Arctic Basin in MD99-2263 (same site as MD99-2264, Figure 2) (Darby et al., 2015).
Chronology
The depth/age model for MD99-2269 (Stoner et al., 2007; Dates in Dunhill et al., 2004; Smith and Licht, 2000) is based on co-mingling of calibrated 14C dates from MD99-2269 (27 dates) and an East Greenland Shelf core (MD99-2322) (20 dates) based on depth-correlated paleomagnetic secular variations (PSVs). All but one of the radiocarbon dates for the age model were on mollusks or benthic foraminifera. The depth/age model (Stoner et al., 2007) has a nearly monotonic sediment accumulation rate (SAR) averaging 21.7 cm/100 yr (or 4.6 ± 2 yr/cm but with variations between 1.3 and 9 yr/cm). In comparison, the best-fit linear depth/age model has r2 = 0.99 with an average departure from the Stoner et al. (2007) data of only ±45 year. Our compilation of proxy records published prior to 2007 (Figure 3) keeps their original age models because of the near constant rate of sediment accumulation noted above. However, we use the Stoner et al. (2007) depth/age model in all of our subsequent analyses and figures (Figures 4–9). We restrict our data analysis here to the last 11,000 cal. yr BP, although the full data to 11.7 cal. ka BP is provided in the online data archive (Kristjánsdóttir et al., 2015; see Appendix).

(a) All δ13C data on the planktonic foram Neogloboquadrina pachyderma (sin) (Np s) in core MD99-2269 (line with filled squares) and the trend (solid line); (b) original δ18O Neogloboquadrina pachyderma sin (Np s) data (filled squares), 60-year integrated estimates after sea-level correction solid line and filled circles, and SSA trend (black line) (Kristjánsdóttir, 2005); (c) original (i.e. neither sea level nor vital effect corrected) δ18O for Islandiella norcrossi/helenae and the trend (see text) solid line on the data.

(a) Alkenone derived temperature (blue line with infilled squares), trend (black line), and %C37 (red solid line); (b) plot of the bottom water temperatures (red line) and trend (black line) based on the Mg/Ca ratios on Islandiella norcrossi/helenae; (c) Mg/Ca ratios for Islandiella norcrossi/helenae (blue) and Neogloboquadrina pachyderma (sin) (red) and the linear trends, slopes, and values for the correlation coefficient r.

Plot of Mg/Ca and δ18O-based (sea-level corrected) temperature estimates based on results from three benthic foraminifera (Kristjánsdóttir, 2005): (a) Islandiella norcrossi/helenae (Is n/h), (b) Melonis barleeanu (Mb), and (c) Cassidulina neoteretis (Cn).

Box plot of 11 proxy temperature estimates for MD99-2269. The box encloses 50% of the data. The small open circles are the outliers (Velleman and Hoaglin, 1981) that were replaced in the standardized data set (see text). Outliers are points whose values are either greater than UQ + 1.5 * IQD or less than LQ – 1.5 * IQD, where UQ and LQ are the upper and lower quartiles and IQD is the Interquartile Distance.

(a) Plot of the normalized scores on 14 proxy data sets between 500 to 9200 cal. yr BP. Sign on the scores adjusted to reflect a cold (blue) to warm (red) gradient. Proxies are arranged from bottom (1) to top (14) with respect to bottom waters to surface water; (b) bar plot of the loadings on the first and second PCAs. Solid red bar = PC 1 scores; gray = PC 2 scores (see also Supplementary Figure 1, available online). The shaded rectangle includes ±0.2 of the PC loading value; (c) PCA scores on the first and second PCAs – the shaded gray area represents the mid-Holocene zone as defined by fuzzy k-mean clustering (see text and Figure 9d).

(a) Plot of the scores on the first PC and the insolation receipts at 60°N (Berger and Loutre, 1991) – the mid-Holocene interval (based on Figure 9d) is shaded gray; (b) polynomial trends and the explained variances for the Uk37 and coccolith data (Giraudeau et al., 2004, 2010); (c) interpretation of the data on 9B and other figures (see Figures 3 and 8a); (d) fraction of each sample (y axis) assigned to the three-part cluster membership.
Methods
We next outline the laboratory procedures used to obtain the new proxy data (Figures 3–6).
Stable isotopes (new data)
Stable isotope measurements of benthic and planktonic foraminifera were obtained from core MD99-2269 (Kristjánsdóttir, 2005). Isotopic analyses were performed at the Leibniz-Laboratory for radiometric dating and stable isotope research at Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Germany, using a Finnigan MAT 251 mass spectrometer with an online coupled Kiel Carbon device. Kristjánsdóttir (2005) obtained δ18Ο data for several benthic foraminiferal species (Cibicides lobatulus (Cl), Cassidulina neoteretis (Cn), Islandiella norcrossi/helenae (Is n/h), Melonis barleeanus (Mb)), but here we concentrate on the data from Islandiella norcrossi/helenae, which has the most complete series. Cibicides lobatulus is an epifaunal species, but the other three are infaunal (Jennings et al., 2004; Kristjánsdóttir et al., 2007a; Rytter et al., 2002). We note that the records from the other infaunal species parallel each other, with a small offset probably associated with their specific vital effect (Kristjánsdóttir et al., 2007a; Smith et al., 2005). δ18O data ratios for the near-surface planktonic foraminiferal species Neogloboquadrina pachyderma (sin) (Np s), and Turborotalita quinqueloba (Tq) were also obtained. The δ18O data were corrected for the change in sea level associated with the melting of the late glacial ice sheets (Fairbanks, 1989).
Castaneda et al. (2004) and Smith et al. (2005) presented a regional analysis of Neogloboquadrina pachyderma (sin) δ18O data; Smith et al. (2005: 1730) argued that the δ18O records were primarily a function of temperature. A comparison of temperatures at 50 m and the δ18O of Neogloboquadrina pachyderma (sin) (equation #6, Smith et al., 2005: 1730) indicated that salinity had little impact on the δ18O values, but this interpretation was not borne out for the early-Holocene (Jennings et al., 2015; Quillmann et al., 2012), and is not supported by our data.
Alkenone sea-surface temperatures (new data)
Alkenone measurements followed the procedure described in Moros et al. (2004) and Risebrobakken et al. (2010). We calculated the sea-surface temperatures (SST°C) from
Mg/Ca ratios (new data)
Sample preparation, species calibrations, and Mg/Ca paleotemperature estimates for the last 4000 years for Neogloboquadrina pachyderma (sin) and three benthic foraminiferal species, Cassidulina neoteretis, Melonis barleeanus, and Islandiella norcrossi/helenae, are provided in Kristjánsdóttir et al. (2007a). The same calibrations are applied to the longer time-series that we present in this paper (Kristjánsdóttir, 2005; Kristjánsdóttir et al., 2015). We focus on the data from Islandiella norcrossi/helenae in order to compare sea-level corrected δ18O and Mg/Ca data.
Data analysis
In preparation for statistical analyses, the new proxy data sets (Table 1, Figures 4–6) were converted into equi-spaced 60-year time steps (the highest common resolution) using the integration option in AnalySeries (Paillard et al., 1996). Outliers, as defined by Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) (Velleman and Hoaglin, 1981), were eliminated (e.g. Figure 7) and their values were adjusted to be the average between adjacent intervals. This procedure results in some loss of information, but the calculated correlation values between the original and converted time-series are >0.8 and allow power spectral analyses to be undertaken. Time-series data potentially consist of a long-term trend, one or more statistically significant periodicities, and noise (Weedon, 2005). We used the commercial version of the UCLA toolkit (kspectra) (Ghil et al., 2002) to evaluate whether significant trends and periodicities exist in our proxies (e.g. Figure 4). We define ‘trend’ as a long-term, low frequency (i.e. multi-millennial) tendency, which is usually removed prior to the investigation of shorter-term variations. We used Singular Spectrum Analysis (SSA) (Kondrashov et al., 2005; Weedon, 2005) to evaluate whether there is a statistically significant trend in the data, and the Multi-Taper Method (MTM) (Mann and Lees, 1996) to ascertain whether residuals from the trend contained any significant century to millenial-scale periodicities.
In the ‘Discussion’ section, we compile a total of 14 new and published proxy time-series between 400 and 9200 cal. yr BP and more intermittently from 100 to 11,000 cal. yr BP (Table 1, Figure 3). We used AnalySeries (Paillard et al., 1996) to convert the data matrix to time-series with samples spaced every 100 years from 400 to 9200 cal. yr BP. Furthermore, we changed the sign on some proxies (i.e. δ18O, quartz wt%, and sea-ice duration) to reflect temperature. Mg/Ca ratios are used directly rather than converted to estimated temperatures. To allow for statistical analysis, the data were standardized with mean values of 0 ± 1. Principal component analysis (PCA) was employed to compare 14 proxies (Table 1) (e.g. Axford et al., 2011) and to determine the strength of association between them. Furthermore, to test whether there were coherent temporal changes in the proxies between 400 and 9200 cal. yr BP we subjected the normalized 14 variables and 100-year estimates (Kristjánsdóttir et al., 2015) to fuzzy k-mean cluster analysis (program ‘FuzMe’; Ding and He, 2004; Ghosh and Dubey, 2013; Granath, 1984; Minasny and McBratney, 2002). This approach allows individual samples to have a degree of membership in more than one cluster, the extent of which is measured by the ‘Confusion Index’ (0 = no confusion; 1 = equal fractions of all clusters), a measure of cluster mixing (Minasny and McBratney, 2002).
Results on new proxy data
In order to assess the broad-scale evolution of Holocene ocean climate on the North Iceland shelf, we focus on whether there are significant trends in our proxies and search for significant periodicities in the residuals from the trends (Table 2).
Significant Multi-Taper Method (MTM) periodicities on detrended proxy data.
CI: confidence interval.
99% CI.
Stable isotopes
The Neogloboquadrina pachyderma (sin) δ13C data show a broad, threefold pattern with depleted δ13C values from 11,000 to ~8500 cal. yr BP, enriched values peaking ~5000 cal. yr BP, and then values falling below 0‰ over the last 2000 cal. yr BP. A total of 69% of the variance is explained by the first two SSAs (Figure 4a), which define the trend. Variations around the trend are of higher amplitude over the last 3000 years.
The Neogloboquadrina pachyderma (sin) δ18O series had a significant trend defined by the first SSA, which accounted for 60% of the variance (Figure 4b) but the residuals from the trend showed no evidence for multi-century significant periodicities (Table 2), hence can be considered ‘noise’. Of particular note is the abrupt decrease in δ18O values from ~3.5‰ to ~2.5‰ between 11,000 and 10,000 cal. yr BP (Figure 4b). The Islandiella norcrossi/helenae data, uncorrected for sea-level rise in the Holocene, show a prolonged decrease in δ18Ο between 10,000 to 6000 cal. ka BP. After 4000 cal. yr BP, these values vary around ~4‰. This change lags the rise in the planktonic δ18Ο values (Figure 4b) and implies water column stratification during the early-Holocene. The benthic series was detrended by removal of the first SSA, which accounted for 70% of the variance and is largely associated with the global rise in sea level (Figure 4c). Residuals from the trend had significant periodicities of 430 and 820 years (Table 2).
Alkenones
The data from MD99-2269 have average estimated
Studies from northern latitudes highlight an empirical relationship between the amount of C37:4 and surface water salinity (Harada et al., 2003; Rosell-Melé, 1998; Rosell-Melé et al., 2002; Sicre et al., 2002). However, the application of C37:4% in the reconstruction of past salinities is still controversial (e.g. Sikes and Sicre, 2002). According to Sikes and Sicre (2002), the observed correlation between C37:4% and salinity in the North Atlantic is an artifact of the strong link between salinity and temperature in these areas. Other studies, however, argue that the relative proportion of C37:4 is a valid indicator for documenting qualitative changes in the influence of freshwater in surface waters in the North Atlantic and Pacific oceans (e.g. Bendle et al., 2005; McClymont et al., 2008). In addition, a coherence of changing proportions of C37:4% in surface sediment and water samples related to salinity gradients has been observed in the Skagerrak area (Blanz et al., 2005; Schulz et al., 2000) and C37:4% has been applied to study Baltic Sea freshwater outflow changes (Rohde Krossa et al., 2014).
Mg/Ca ratios
The temperature reconstructions in Húnaflóadjúp over the last 4000 cal. yr BP (Kristjánsdóttir et al., 2007a) show an incursion of Arctic Waters ca. 500 cal. yr BP; this is also seen in the re-appearance of the Arctic benthic foraminifera Elphidium excavatum forma clavata (Giraudeau et al., 2004).
The modern calibration data for Islandiella norcrossi/helenae (Kristjánsdóttir et al., 2007a) indicate that the linear transfer function for the temperature for the yi sample is as follows: T°C = (Mg/Ca – 1.04)/0.075 with r2 = 0.93 and a Root MSE of 0.56. Although there are theoretical reasons for a non-linear relationship (Kristjánsdóttir et al., 2007a), in this particular case there is no statistical advantage in the use of other expressions. The results indicate an average infaunal calcification temperature of 4.1 ± 1.5°C (4.1 ± 1.4°C for the exponential equation) with a maximum estimate of 9.1°C and a minimum of ~1.0°C. The results show a trend for bottom water temperatures (BWT°Cs) to decrease throughout the length of the record (~360–1,300 cal. yr BP). The trend in the data explained 49% of the variance, and it is marked by a broad temperature maximum at about 10,000 cal. yr BP and an abrupt decrease in BWT°C ~4000 cal. yr BP (Figure 5b). There is a significant 1000-year periodicity in the detrended time-series (Table 2).
Mg/Ca ratios were obtained on the near-surface planktic foraminifera Neogloboquadrina pachyderma (sin) (Kristjánsdóttir, 2005; Kristjánsdóttir et al., 2015) (Figure 5c). Questions exist on the temperature calibration of this species (Meland et al., 2006), but application of the Elderfield and Ganssen (2000) equation resulted in an average calcification temperature estimate of 5.5 ± 0.8°C. We use the Mg/Ca Neogloboquadrina pachyderma (sin) ratios to derive an overall trend and to compare that record with the Mg/Ca ratios from Islandiella norcrossi/helenae. An important question is whether the near-surface and infaunal BWT°Cs follow similar trends throughout the period of our records. Figure 5c shows that both near-surface and infaunal species show a systematic and highly significant (prob. F > 0.0000) decrease in Mg/Ca ratios throughout the last 11,000 years requiring an overall decrease in temperature of the entire water column.
For the detrended data (Figures 4 –6), the most frequent periodicities of residuals are in the 400- to 500-year interval (Table 2), but it is unclear whether these have any temporal coherence or association with solar forcing (Clemens, 2005; Turney et al., 2005).
Estimate of changes in temperature and salinity
We compare temperature estimates based on Mg/Ca ratios and on δ18O from foraminifera (Figure 6). Temperature estimates (not shown) were calculated from Neogloboquadrina pachyderma (sin) δ18O ratios using the Shackleton (1974) equation (Kristjánsdóttir, 2005; Kristjánsdóttir et al., 2007a). For the benthic foraminifera, the δ18O values require correction for changes in sea level and vital effects. Vital effect/disequilibrium corrections are Islandiella norcrossi/helenae δ18Ocalcite VPDB –0.298 (n = 9), Melonis barleeanus δ18Ocalcite VPDB 0.276 (n = 18), and Cassidulina neoteretis δ18Ocalcite VPDB – 0.047 (n = 18) (Kristjánsdóttir, 2005; Kristjánsdóttir et al., 2007a: 18/27). The δ18Osw was taken to be 0.28‰ (Kristjánsdóttir et al., 2007a; Smith et al., 2005). Temperature estimates based on benthic foraminifera δ18O are higher than those derived from their Mg/Ca ratios (Figure 6). When paired data are plotted, it is noticeable that there is a divergence close to the middle-/late-Holocene boundary with the Mg/Ca estimates trending more sharply downward than the δ18O-based estimates implying a decrease in salinity. If the Mg/Ca T°C estimates are substituted into the Shackleton (1974) equation, the equation can be re-arranged to solve for δ18Osw. We did this for our most complete series Islandiella norcrossi/helenae. The results indicate an average δ18Osw of 0.28‰, and there is a decrease in δ18Osw over the last 5000 cal. yr BP implying that the salinity of the bottom waters has decreased. This is illustrated in the divergence of the T°C estimates, especially for Islandiella norcrossi/helenae (Figure 6a).
Discussion: Structure of Holocene ocean climate variability at MD99-2269
Our analysis is next focused on ascertaining the broad structure of changes in Holocene conditions on the North Iceland shelf based on (1) our new ocean climate proxies and (2) other published records (Table 1). However, the area was also affected by other factors whose impacts may be contained in the sediment record. Two specific examples are changes in relative sea level (Quillmann et al., 2010; Rundgren et al., 1997), and possible impact of the Storegga submarine slide (Bondevik et al., 1996; Dawson et al., 2011). The combination of a lower relative sea level (0 to −20 m) and the tsunami generated by the slide could have potentially impacted the sediment record (e.g. the >63-µm grain-size data; Figure 3). However, there is no evidence that deposition at MD99-2269 was disrupted (Kristjánsdóttir, 2005).
We ask, should we expect to see significant levels of correlation between surface or near-surface proxies and those being imprinted at the seafloor? (e.g. Figure 3). We compare the proxies in MD99-2269, based on their location within the water column (surface, near-surface, bottom). Figure 7 shows the estimated Holocene range of temperature estimates on 11 proxies for surface, near-surface, and bottom temperatures. The results show an overall decrease in T°C averaging around 10°C at the sea surface to ~5°C at the seafloor with temperature ranges of 3–7°C (Figure 7). However, this figure also clearly demonstrates that different proxies result in considerably different median temperature estimates and ranges, but it is difficult to explain exactly what are the causes of the differences, and they may be associated with calibration approaches.
Figure 8a plots the standardized data matrix for the 14 ocean climate variables (see section ‘Methods’ and Table 1) between 400 and 9200 cal. yr BP. PCA (Davis, 1986) indicated that the first PC explained 39% of the variance and the second PC added a further 18% explanation (Figure 8b). The first PC is positively loaded with temperature-associated variables (e.g. Mg/Ca of benthic foraminifera, quartz wt%, and SST°C estimates from diatoms), and negatively associated with nutrient associated variables such as coccoliths and calcite wt% (Figure 8b; Supplementary Figure 1, available online). The PC 1 and 2 scores define the basic structure of the 14 proxies and portray a long-term trend (PC 1) and an inverted U-shape (PC 2) pattern (Figure 8c).
In Figure 9, we present an interpretation of the data. The dominant trend is consistent with decreasing summer insolation during the Holocene (Figure 9a) (e.g. Jiang et al., 2015; Thornalley et al., 2013). However, we have to explain the low levels of calcite in the early-Holocene versus the high SST°C estimates (Figure 9b) and the low δ18O values of benthic foraminifera. We hypothesize that the lag in the timing of the early-/middle-Holocene boundary and the strikingly different trends in SST°C and coccolith records (Figure 9b and c) reflect a long-lived freshwater cap on the Iceland Shelf that must reflect the export of freshwater from the final retreat phase of Northern Hemisphere Ice Sheets, and in particular the Laurentide Ice Sheet (Dyke et al., 2002; Jennings et al., 2015; Renssen et al., 2002). This episode is also marked by high wt% of quartz (Figure 3), which reflects significant advection of drift ice (Moros et al., 2006), probably via Fram Strait (e.g. Fisher et al., 2002), which in turn suggests an increase in freshwater transport. The increase in freshwater during the late-Holocene (Figure 6) may well reflect the increase in the export of sea ice through Fram Strait associated with the flooding of the shallow Arctic shelves (Bauch et al., 2001; Blaschek and Renssen, 2013). The importance of changes in the salinity of surface waters on nutrient availability is well documented for the Iceland Shelf (Stefansson and Olafsson, 1991; Thordardottir, 1984, 1986).
Division of the Holocene
We used the performance indicators calculated in FuzMe (Minasny and McBratney, 2002) to determine that three discrete clusters could be identified in the 14 variable matrix. We tested the robustness of the threefold cluster assignments using discriminant function analysis (Davis, 1986). The null hypothesis was rejected at the p > 0.0001 level and only one sample was misclassified. A plot of the cluster membership versus age clearly demarcated early-, middle-, and late-Holocene intervals with boundaries of ~6350 and ~3450 cal. yr BP (Figure 9a and d – see also Figure 3). The Confusion/Mixing Index reaches maximum values during the transitions. The early- to middle-Holocene transition has two strong precursors prior to the abrupt transition ca 6350 cal. yr BP, whereas the middle- to late-Holocene transition is abrupt, with the suggestion toward an initial move to cooler conditions ca 4000 cal. yr BP (Figure 9d). In a high-resolution biomarker study at site MD99-2266, to the west of our site (Figure 2), Moossen et al. (2015) identified major ocean climate boundaries at 7.8 and 3.2 cal. ka BP, whereas Olafsdottir et al. (2010) noted two regime shifts at 4 and 8 cal. ka BP in an adjacent site, MD99-2264 (Figure 2). An evaluation of climate proxy records from Icelandic lake sediments (Geirsdottir et al., 2013) concluded that peak summer warmth occurred by 7.9 cal. ka BP and that evidence for cooler conditions was evident by 5.5 cal. ka BP, with all proxies recording ‘cold perturbation’ 4.3–4.0 cal. ka BP (p. 48). Our early/middle-Holocene boundary occurs 1400 years later than noted in these marine and lake sites, and ~1600 years later than the suggestions of Walker et al. (2012), whereas the middle-/late-Holocene boundary is similar in age. Not surprisingly, this comparison reveals that regional climate conditions can lead or lag globally defined boundaries, especially in areas near climate frontal boundaries. It also suggests that the North Iceland shelf (MD99-2269) has a more complex Holocene history than sites in NW Iceland, reflecting its more complex oceanographic setting.
Conclusion
Our paper uses proxy ocean climate records from a single core, located in a climatically highly sensitive area of the northern North Atlantic (Figures 1 and 2), to ascertain whether they portray a common signal:
The common signal at MD99-2269 is for both surface and BWT°Cs to decrease throughout the Holocene.
Nutrient availability and surface productivity was highest in the middle-Holocene, here defined as the interval between 6350 and ~3450 cal. yr BP.
Many proxies had a significant trend in their values that explained a large fraction (>40%) of the variance in the signal – this trend is associated with decreasing Holocene summer insolation in the Northern Hemisphere.
A variety of multi-century to millennial periodicities can be detected in the detrended data at the ⩾95% confidence level, but there is no obvious common periodicity other than the ~430-year interval.
The early-Holocene is marked by contrasting proxy signals that we propose are the result of the impact of a freshwater cap on both SST°C and on nutrient depletion.
The increase in quartz and the decrease in salinity in the late-Holocene probably reflect an increase in the advection of sea ice from the Arctic Ocean to northern Iceland.
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
We thank the authors of the previous papers dealing with data from MD99-2269 for their considerable contributions. We appreciate the comments and suggestions of Professor Simon Belt on an earlier draft of this paper, and the comments of two reviewers and the Editor, which resulted in substantial changes in organization of the manuscript. The paper is a contribution to the Abrupt North Atlantic Transitions and Ice, Lakes, and Sea and Arctic Holocene Transition Projects.
Funding
Cruise B997 was supported by NSF-ATM-9531397 and in large part by Icelandic resources. NSF OCE-9809001 and subsequent research by NSF OPP-0004233 supported our participation in the IMAGES IV cruise. Kristjánsdóttir research was supported by an NSF-ESH grant ATM-0317832 to JTA and AEJ and along with student grants to, from RANNIS, Fulbright, and AAUW.
