Risk assessment model of occupational exposure to nanomaterials

Abstract

Recent development of nanotechnology allows precise assessment of the risks workers are exposed to. To assess the risks, a specific risk assessment model has been developed with reference to workplaces where nanoparticles are present. This model allows identification and quantification of the health hazards for workers. The use of nanomaterials presents some uncertainties regarding effective level of danger, and risk assessment takes this into consideration with the help of an appropriate index. An evaluation algorithm considers both normal work conditions and abnormal/emergency situations. Evaluation outcome consists of several risk levels with several subdivisions. For each single level, it is possible to develop specific behavioral guidelines. The present evaluation model has been implemented in research laboratories. The results are middle to high-level risks.

Keywords

carbon nanotubes nano-titanium dioxide (nanoTiO2)nanomaterials nanotoxicity risk assessment single wall nanotubes (SWNTs)

References

Oberdörster, G. , Maynard, A. , Donaldson , K. , Castranova, V. , Fitzpatrick, J. , Ausman, K. , et al. Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: elements of a screening strategy. Part Fibre Toxicol 2005 ; 2: 8.

Seaton, A. , Donaldson, K. Nanoscience, nanotoxicology, and the need to think small. Lancet 2005; 365: 923-924.

Department for Environment. Food, and Rural Affairs. Characterising the potential risks posed by engineered nanoparticles: a second UK Government research report. London, UK: DEFRA; 2007.

Department for Environment. Food, and Rural Affairs. A scoping study to identify exposure data needs for addressing the risks presented by nanoparticles and nanotubes. London, UK: DEFRA; 2005.

Colvin, V. The potential environmental impact of engineered nanomaterials. Nat Biotechnol 2003; 21: 1166- 1170.

Oberdorster, E. Manufactured nanomaterials (fullerenes, C60) induce oxidative stress in the brain of juvenile largemouth bass. Environ Health Perspect 2004; 112: 1058-1062.

Tsuji, JS , Maynard, AD , Howard, PC , James, JT , Lam, C-W. , Warheit, DB , et al. Research strategies for safety evaluation of nanomaterials, part IV: risk assessment of nanoparticles. Toxicol Sci 2005; 89: 42-50.

Maynard, A. , Aitken, R. , Butz, T. , Colvin, V. , et al. Safe handling of nanotechnology. Nature 2006; 444: 267- 269.

Balbus, JM , Maynard, AD , Colvin, VL , Castranova, V. , Daston, GP , Denison, RA , et al. Hazard assessment for nanoparticles. Environ Health Perspect 2007; 115: 1654-1659.

10.

Commission of the European Communities. A code of conduct for responsible nanosciences and nanotechnologies research. Commission Recommendation of 07/02/2008, 2008.

11.

Commission of the European Communities. Nanosciences and nanotechnologies: an action plan for Europe 2005-2009. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, 2005.

12.

Borm, P. , Klaessig, FC , Landry, TD , Moudgil, B. , Pauluhn, J. , Thomas, K. , et al. Research strategies for safety evaluation of nanomaterials, part V: role of dissolution in biological fate and effects of nanoscale particles . Toxicol Sci 2006; 90: 23-32.

13.

Kirchner, C. , Liedl, T. , Kudera , S. , Pellegrino, T. , Javier, AM , Gaub, HE , et al. Cytotoxicity of colloidal CdSe and CdSe/ZnS nanoparticles. Nano Lett 2005; 5: 331- 338.

14.

Borm, PJA , Kreyling, W. Toxicological hazards of inhaled nanoparticles potential implications for drug delivery. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2004; 4: 521-531.

15.

Durrenberger, F. , Hock, J. , Hohener , K. Overview of completed and ongoing activities in the field: safety and risks of nanotechnology. Temas Ag: Arbon, Suisse; 2004.

16.

Oberdörster, G. , Oberdörster , E. , Oberdörster, J. Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 2005; 113: 823-839.