Cognitive function,disease burden and the structural connectome in systemic lupus erythematosus

Abstract

Objective

To investigate brain structural connectivity in relation to cognitive abilities and systemic damage in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods

Structural and diffusion MRI data were acquired from 47 patients with SLE. Brains were segmented into 85 cortical and subcortical regions and combined with whole brain tractography to generate structural connectomes using graph theory. Global cognitive abilities were assessed using a composite variable g, derived from the first principal component of three common clinical screening tests of neurological function. SLE damage (LD) was measured using a composite of a validated SLE damage score and disease duration. Relationships between network connectivity metrics, cognitive ability and systemic damage were investigated. Hub nodes were identified. Multiple linear regression, adjusting for covariates, was employed to model the outcomes g and LD as a function of network metrics.

Results

The network measures of density (standardised ß = 0.266, p = 0.025) and strength (standardised ß = 0.317, p = 0.022) were independently related to cognitive abilities. Strength (standardised ß = –0.330, p = 0.048), mean shortest path length (standardised ß = 0.401, p = 0.020), global efficiency (standardised ß = –0.355, p = 0.041) and clustering coefficient (standardised ß = –0.378, p = 0.030) were independently related to systemic damage. Network metrics were not related to current disease activity.

Conclusion

Better cognitive abilities and more SLE damage are related to brain topological network properties in this sample of SLE patients, even those without neuropsychiatric involvement and after correcting for important covariates. These data show that connectomics might be useful for understanding and monitoring cognitive function and white matter damage in SLE.

Keywords

Connectome systemic lupus erythematosus cognition MRI

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Sporns

. Structure and function of complex brain networks. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2013; 15: 247–262.

Rubinov

Sporns

. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations. Neuroimage 2010; 52: 1059–1069.

Bullmore

Sporns

. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009; 10: 186–198.

Sporns

. Contributions and challenges for network models in cognitive neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 2014; 175: 652–660.

Wiseman

Bastin

Jardin

et al.

Cerebral small vessel disease burden is increased in systemic lupus erythematosus. Stroke 2016; 47: 2722–2728.

Wardlaw

Smith

Dichgans

. Mechanisms of sporadic cerebral small vessel disease: insights from neuroimaging. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12: 483–497.

Wardlaw

Smith

Biessels

et al.

Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12: 822–838.

Wiseman

Bastin

Hamilton

et al.

Fatigue and cognitive function in systemic lupus erythematosus: associations with white matter microstructural damage. A diffusion tensor MRI study and meta-analysis. Lupus 2017; 26: 588–597.

Sporns

Honey

Kotter

. Identification and classification of hubs in brain networks. PLoS One 2007; 2: e1049–e1049.

10.

Hochberg

. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1997; 40: 1725–1725.

11.

Nasreddine

Phillips

Bedirian

et al.

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53: 695–699.

12.

Hsieh

Schubert

Hoon

Mioshi

Hodges

. Validation of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2013; 36: 242–250.

13.

Folstein

McHugh

. Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiat Res 1975; 12: 189–198.

14.

Nelson H, Willison J. National Adult Reading Test (NART): Test Manual. NFER-Nelson Publ, 1982.

15.

McGurn

Starr

Topfer

et al.

Pronunciation of irregular words is preserved in dementia, validating premorbid IQ estimation. Neurology 2004; 62: 1184–1187.

16.

Gladman

Ibanez

Urowitz

. Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000. J Rheumatol 2002; 29: 288–291.

17.

Isenberg

Rahman

Allen

et al.

BILAG 2004. Development and initial validation of an updated version of the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group’s disease activity index for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology 2005; 44: 902–906.

18.

Gladman

Ginzler

Goldsmith

et al.

The development and initial validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/America College of Rheumatology damage index for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1996; 39: 363–369.

19.

Gladman

Goldsmith

Urowitz

et al.

The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology (SLICC/ACR) damage index for systemic lupus erythematosus international comparison. J Rheumatol 2000; 27: 373–376.

20.

Miyakis

Lockshin

Atsumi

et al.

International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definitive antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). J Thromb Haemost 2006; 4: 295–306.

21.

Fazekas

Chawluk

Alavi

Hurtig

Zimmermann

. MR signal abnormalities at 1.5T in Alzheimer’s dementia and normal aging. Am J Roentgenol 1987; 149: 351–356.

22.

Wardlaw

Bastin

Valdés Hernández

et al.

Brain aging, cognition in youth and old age and vascular disease in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936: rationale, design and methodology of the imaging protocol. Int J Stroke 2011; 6: 547–559.

23.

Valdés Hernández

del

Armitage

Thrippleton

et al.

Rationale, design and methodology of the image analysis protocol for studies of patients with cerebral small vessel disease and mild stroke. Brain Behav 2015; 26 5: e00415–e00415.

24.

R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2013. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

25.

Gardner

Altman

. Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. BMJ 1986; 292: 746–750.

26.

Lydersen

. Statistical review: frequently given comments. Ann Rheum Dis 2015; 74: 323–325.

27.

Yeo

Ryman

van den Heuvel

et al.

Graph metrics of structural brain networks in individuals with schizophrenia and healthy controls: group differences, relationships with intelligence, and genetics. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2016; 22: 240–249.

28.

Lawrence

Chung

Morris

Markus

Barrick

. Structural network efficiency is associated with cognitive impairment in small-vessel disease. Neurology 2014; 83: 304–311.

29.

Tuladhar

van Dijk

Zwiers

et al.

Structural network connectivity and cognition in cerebral small vessel disease. Hum Brain Mapp 2016; 37: 300–310.

30.

Reijmer

Fotiadis

Martinez-Ramirez

et al.

Structural network alterations and neurological dysfunction in cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Brain 2015; 138: 179–188.

31.

Hou

Lin

Zhang

et al.

Abnormalities of frontal-parietal resting-state functional connectivity are related to disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. PLoS One 2013; 8: 1–9.

32.

Hui

Mok

Jian

Lau

Mak

HKF

. Structural brain network reorganization in patients with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Neuroradiol 2017; 38: 64–70.

33.

Toga

Clark

Thompson

Shattuck

van Horn

. Mapping the human connectome. Neurosurgery 2012; 71: 1–5.

34.

Zalesky

Fornito

Harding

et al.

Whole-brain anatomical networks: does the choice of nodes matter?

Neuroimage 2010; 50: 970–983.

35.

Hagmann

Cammoun

Gigandet

et al.

MR connectomics: principles and challenges. J Neurosci Methods 2010; 194: 34–45.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.13 MB