Abstract
Introduction
Renal involvement is seen in about 40-82% of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) Asian patients. The exact diagnosis and classification of lupus nephritis are important for treatment and prognosis. This study aimed to investigate the value of electron microscopy (EM) in the diagnosis and classification of lupus nephritis compared with light microscopy.
Method
In this cross-sectional referral-center 16-year study of lupus nephritis, the final diagnosis was based on the EM study. Primary light microscopy findings were compared with EM diagnosis. Moreover, Immunofluorescence patterns distribution was assessed.
Results
From 496 patients diagnosed with lupus nephritis based on EM, 225(45.4%) of patients were categorized in class IV, followed by 98(19.7%), 93(18.8%), 46(9.3%), and 14(2.8%) who were categorized into classes of II, III, V, and VI respectively. Only 1(0.2%) patient belonged to class I, and 19(3.8%) cases were diagnosed with mixed two classes. Using EM was essential for diagnosing 25.6% of cases taking the correct classification by light microscopy into account; however, disregarding correct classification, this could change to a 7.4% contribution rate of EM. The most common cause of misdiagnosis, disregarding incorrect classification, was inadequate or wrong tissue. Positive associations were detected between tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis of both electron and light microscopy with different classes (P < 0.001).
Conclusion
While light microscopy is highly accurate for diagnosing lupus nephritis regardless of correct classification, EM contributes substantially to the correct classification of lupus nephritis types.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
