Temporal turbulence in the polycrisis: Editors’ introduction to the special section

Abstract

In this introduction to the special section, we outline the central questions that animate our concerns about the diverse forms that temporal turbulence is taking in the context of intensifying climate change and precipitous biodiversity loss: Does the contemporary conjuncture of ‘colonial-ecological crisis’ compel a more thoroughgoing review of ideas about time and temporality across the disciplines? What relationships exist between the long durée of European colonialism and ongoing environmental collapse in different parts of the world? How are dominant actors – legal, political and corporate – seeking to disable or dilute challenges to long-entrenched temporalities, both colonial and capitalist? And why is temporal multiplicity or ‘pluriversality’ so important in the contemporary conjuncture, not only for conceptualizing the world-historical processes that have precipitated this polycrisis but also for the possibility of new affective orientations and more creative policy innovations? As the four contributions to this special section demonstrate, albeit in relation to different institutions, in different registers and drawing on different disciplinary knowledges, there is an urgent need to both conceptualize and seek strategic solutions for the eco-political challenges of our time in more temporally plural, expansive, multi-directional, relational, moral and decolonial ways. While the climate crisis is often treated as a technical problem – or at least one amenable to forward-looking solutions that do not require wrestling with colonial pasts or neocolonial presents – the contributions to this special section all suggest otherwise. Taken together, they argue for a powerful reimagining of the temporal coordinates, assumptions and logics that characterize the present moment, and they gesture towards new temporal practices that might prove more genuinely responsible (and responsive) in the face of intensifying political, social and ecological turbulence.

Keywords

temporality climate change polycrisis turbulence intergenerational responsibility pluriversality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adeyeri

(2026) Heat with no end: climate model sets out an unbearable future for parts of Africa, The Conversation, 8 February.

Bremer

Schneider

(2024) How seasonal cultures shape adaptation on aotearoa–New Zealand’s coromandel Peninsula. Global Environmental Change 85: 102822.

Brown

(2019) In the ruins of neoliberalism: The rise of antidemocratic politics in the west. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Cant

(2005) The polycrisis and its implications. Geographical Journal 171(3): 1–15.

Carrington

(2026) Point of no return: a hellish “hothouse Earth” getting closer, scientists say’, The Guardian, 11 February.

Dauvergne

Shipton

(2023) Global environmental politics in a turbulent era. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Press.

Duvernoy

(2025) Relational time and creolizing eschatology. Time and Society. Online first 14 May 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X251333836.

Ferdinand

(2022) A decolonial ecology: Thinking from the Caribbean world. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Folkers

(2021) Fossil modernity: The materiality of acceleration, slow violence, and ecological futures. Time & Society 30(3): 319–344.

10.

Grear

(2019) Anthropocene “time”? A reflection on temporalities in the “new age of the human”. In: Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos

(ed) Routledge Handbook of Law and Theory. Routledge.

11.

Hage

(2016) État de siège: A dying domesticating colonialism? American Ethnologist 43(1): 38–49.

12.

Haraway

(2015) Anthropocene, capitalocene, plantationocene, chthulucene: Making kin. Environmental Humanities 6(1): 159–165.

13.

Harvey

(1989) The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford, UK and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

14.

Hornborg

Malm

(2014) The geology of mankind? A critique of the anthropocene narrative. The Anthropocene Review 1(1): 62–69.

15.

IPCC (2022) IPCC Sixth Assessment Report. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/.

16.

Malm

(2016) Fossil capital: The rise of steam power and the roots of global warming. London: Verso.

17.

Miller

Heinberg

(2023) Welcome to the great unraveling: Navigating the polycrisis of environmental and social breakdown. Corvallis, OR: Post Carbon Institute.

18.

Mills

(1997) The racial contract. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

19.

Mills

(2007) White ignorance. In: Sullivan

Tuana

(eds) Race and epistemologies of ignorance. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press, 13–38.

20.

Mills

(2017) Black rights/white wrongs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

21.

Mirzoeff

(2018) It's not the Anthropocene, it's the white supremacy scene; or, the geological color line. In: Grusin

(ed) After Extinction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

22.

Mirzoeff

(2018) It’s not the anthropocene, it’s the white supremacy scene; or, the geological colour line. Afterimage 45(4): 123–127.

23.

Moore

(2015) Capitalism in the web of life: Ecology and the accumulation of capital. London: Verso.

24.

Nixon

(2011) Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

25.

Rothberg

(2019) The Implicated Subject: Beyond Victims and Perpetrators. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

26.

Schlosberg

(2023) Turbulence, converging crises, and environmental justice. In: Dauvergne

Shipton

(eds) Global environmental politics in a turbulent era. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Press. Chapter 2, pp.13–24. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802207149.00008 .

27.

Serres

(2014) Times of crisis: What the financial crisis revealed and how to reinvent our lives and future. New York, NY and London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.

28.

Sharpe

(2018) In the wake: On blackness and being. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

29.

Todd

(2016) An Indigenous feminist's take on the ontological turn: ‘Ontology’ is just another word for colonialism. Journal of Historical Sociology 29(1): 4–22.

30.

Tooze

(2022) Welcome to the world of the polycrisis. Financial Times, 28 October. https://www.ft.com/content/498398e7-11b1-494b-9cd3-6d669dc3de33.

31.

Tsing

Haraway

(2016) In Jason W. Moore (ed.) Anthropocene or capitalocene? Nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism. Oakland, CA: PM Press.

32.

Whyte

(2017) Is it colonial déjà vu? In: Adamson

Davis

(eds) Humanities for the environment. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Earthscan, 88–105.

33.

Whyte

(2021) Time as kinship. In: Jeffrey

Stephanie

(eds) The Cambridge companion to environmental humanities. pp 39–55. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009039369 .

34.

Winter

(2026) Temporal lies: A decolonial account of denatured seasonal celebrations in Aotearoa New Zealand. Time and Society. Online first 3 April 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X261426748.

35.

Winter

(2020) Does time colonise intergenerational environmental justice theory? Environmental Politics 29(2): 278–296.

36.

Winter

(2022) The subjects of intergenerational justice: Indigenous philosophy, the environment and relationships. London: Routledge.

37.

Wright

(2013) The swan book. Artarmon, NSW: Giramondo Publishing.