Prior biological knowledge-based approaches for the analysis of genome-wide expression profiles using gene sets and pathways

Abstract

An increasing challenge in analysis of microarray data is how to interpret and gain biological insight of profiles of thousands of genes. This article provides a review of statistical methods for analysis of microarray data by incorporating prior biological knowledge using gene sets and biological pathways, which consist of groups of biologically similar genes. We first discuss issues of individual gene analysis. We compare several methods for analysis of gene sets including over-representation anlaysis, gene set enrichment analysis, principal component analysis, global test and kernel machine. We discuss the assumptions of these methods and their pros and cons. We illustrate these methods by application to a type II diabetes data set.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Schena M. , Shalon D. , Davis RW , Brown PO Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science 1995; 270(5235): 467.

Li C. , Wong WH Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: expression index computation and outlier detection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2001; 98(1): 31-36.

Tseng GC , Oh MK , Rohlin L. , Liao JC , Wong WH Issues in cDNA microarray analysis: quality filtering, channel normalization, models of variations and assessment of gene effects. Nucleic Acids Research 2001; 29(12): 2549.

Bolstad B. , Collin F. , Simpson K. , Irizarry R. , Speed T. Experimental design and low-level analysis of microarray data. International Review of Neurobiology 2004; 60: 25.

Speed T. Statistical analysis of gene expression microarray data. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL; 2003.

Wu Z. , Irizarry RA , Gentleman R. , Martinez-Murillo F. , Spencer F. A model-based background adjustment for oligonucleotide expression arrays . Journal of the American Statistical Association 2004; 99(468): 909-17.

Benjamini Y. , Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological) 1995 ; 57: 289-300.

Storey J. A direct approach to false discovery rates. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 2002; 64(3): 479-98.

Nacu S. , Critchley-Thorne R. , Lee P. , Holmes S. Gene expression network analysis and applications to immunology. Bioinformatics 2007; 23(7): 850-58.

10.

Kanehisa M. , Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes . Nucleic Acids Research 2000; 28(1): 27.

11.

Ashburner M. , Ball CA , Blake JA et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genetics 2000; 25(1): 25-29.

12.

Gentleman R. Using GO for statistical analyses. In Antoch J, ed. Proceedings in Computational Statistics COMPSTAT 2004 - Physica Verlag, Heidelberg; 2004: 171-180.

13.

Subramanian A. , Tamayo P. , Mootha VK et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2005; 102(43): 15545-50.

14.

Goeman JJ , Van De Geer SA , De Kort F. , Van Houwelingen HC A global test for groups of genes: testing association with a clinical outcome . Bioinformatics 2004; 20(1): 93-99.

15.

Tomfohr J. , Lu J. , Kepler TB Pathway level analysis of gene expression using singular value decomposition . BMC Bioinformatics 2005; 6(1): 225.

16.

Manoli T. , Gretz N. , Groene HJ , Marc K. , Eils R. , Brors B. Group testing for pathway analysis improves comparability of different microarray datasets. Bioinformatics 2006; 22(20): 2500-06.

17.

Liu D. , Lin X. , Ghosh D. Semiparametric regression of multidimensional genetic pathway data: least-squares kernel machines and linear mixed models. Biometrics 2007; 63(4): 1079-88.

18.

Efron B. Correlation and large-scale simultaneous significance testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2007; 102(477): 93-103.

19.

Fortunel N. , Otu H. , Ng H. et al. Comment on "‘Stemness’: transcriptional profiling of embryonic and adult stem cells" and "a stem cell molecular signature". Science 2003; 302(5644): 393.

20.

Draghici S. , Khatri P. , Martins RP , Ostermeier GC , Krawetz SA Global functional profiling of gene expression . Genomics 2003; 81(2): 98-104.

21.

Khatri P. , Draghici S. Ontological analysis of gene expression data: current tools, limitations, and open problems. Bioinformatics 2005; 21(18): 3587-95.

22.

Mootha VK , Lindgren CM , Eriksson KF et al. PGC-1α-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nature Genetics 2003; 34(3): 267-73.

23.

Sweet-Cordero A. , Mukherjee S. , Subramanian A. et al. An oncogenic KRAS2 expression signature identified by cross-species gene-expression analysis. Nature Genetics 2004; 37: 48-55.

24.

Efron B. , Tibshirani R. On testing the significance of sets of genes. Annals of Applied Statistics 2007; 1(1): 107-29.

25.

Smyth GK Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 2004; 3(1): 3.

26.

Tian L. , Greenberg SA , Kong SW , Altschuler J. , Kohane IS , Park PJ Discovering statistically significant pathways in expression profiling studies . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2005; 102(38): 13544-49.

27.

Pavlidis P. , Lewis DP , Noble WS Exploring gene expression data with class scores. In Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. New Jersey; 2002: 474-85.

28.

Rahnenfuhrer J. , Domingues FS , Maydt J. , Lengauer T. Calculating the statistical significance of changes in pathway activity from gene expression data. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 2004; 3(1): 16.

29.

Mccullagh P. , Nelder JA Generalized linear models monographs on statistics and applied probability . Chapman and Hall, London; 1989.

30.

Lin X. Variance component testing in generalised linear models with random effects . Biometrika 1997; 84(2): 309-26.

31.

Price AL , Patterson NJ , Plenge RM , Weinblatt ME , Shadick NA , Reich D. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nature Genetics 2006; 38(8): 904-09.

32.

Kong SW , Pu WT , Park PJ A multivariate approach for integrating genome-wide expression data and biological knowledge. Bioinformatics 2006; 22(19): 2373.

33.

Cangelosi R. , Goriely A. Component retention in principal component analysis with application to cDNA microarray data. Biology Direct 2007; 2(1): 2.

34.

Peres-Neto PR , Jackson DA , Somers KM How many principal components? Stopping rules for determining the number of non-trivial axes revisited. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2005; 49(4): 974-97.

35.

Valle S. , Li W. , Qin SJ Selection of the number of principal components: the variance of the reconstruction error criterion with a comparison to other methods. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 1999; 38(11): 4389-4401.

36.

Jolliffe I. Principal component analysis. Springer, New York; 2002.

37.

Zhu M. , Ghodsi A. Automatic dimensionality selection from the scree plot via the use of profile likelihood. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2006; 51(2): 918-30.

38.

Goeman JJ , Buhlmann P. Analyzing gene expression data in terms of gene sets: methodological issues . Bioinformatics 2007; 23(8): 980.

39.

Allison DB , Cui X. , Page GP , Sabripour M. Microarray data analysis: from disarray to consolidation and consensus. Nature Reviews Genetics 2006; 7(1): 55-65.

40.

Bair E. , Hastie T. , Paul D. , Tibshirani R. Prediction by supervised principal components. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2006; 101(473): 119-37.