Using causal diagrams to guide analysis in missing data problems

Abstract

Estimating causal effects from incomplete data requires additional and inherently untestable assumptions regarding the mechanism giving rise to the missing data. We show that using causal diagrams to represent these additional assumptions both complements and clarifies some of the central issues in missing data theory, such as Rubin's classification of missingness mechanisms (as missing completely at random (MCAR), missing at random (MAR) or missing not at random (MNAR)) and the circumstances in which causal effects can be estimated without bias by analysing only the subjects with complete data. In doing so, we formally extend the back-door criterion of Pearl and others for use in incomplete data examples. These ideas are illustrated with an example drawn from an occupational cohort study of the effect of cosmic radiation on skin cancer incidence.

Keywords

causal diagram causal inference missing data

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Pearl

. Causal diagrams for empirical research. Biometrika 1995; 82: 669–709.

Greenland

Pearl

Robins

. Causal diagrams for epidemiological research. Epidemiology 1999; 10: 37–48.

Hernán

Hernández-Díaz

Robins

. A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology 2004; 15: 615–625.

Pizzi

Evans

De Stavola

Evans

Clemens

dos Santos Silva

. Lifestyle of UK commercial aircrews relative to air traffic controllers and the general population. Aviat Space Environ Med 2008; 79: 964–974.

Rubin

. Inference and missing data. Biometrika 1976; 63: 581–592.

Rathouz

. Identifiability assumptions for missing covariate data in failure time regression models. Biostatistics 2007; 8: 345–356.

Giorgi

Belot

Gaudart

Launoy

. French Network of Cancer Registries FRANCIM. The performance of multiple imputation for missing covariate data within the context of regression relative survival analysis. Stat Med 2008; 27: 6310–6331.

Molenberghs

Kenward

. Missing data in clinical studies. Chichester: Wiley, 2007.

Little

RJA

Rubin

. Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley, 2002.

10.

Rubin

. Multiple imputations in sample surveys. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, 1978, pp.20–34.

11.

Rubin

. Multiple imputation after 18+ years. J Am Stat Assoc 1996; 91: 473–489.

12.

Robins

Rotnitzky

Zhao

. Analysis of semiparametric regression models for repeated outcomes in the presence of missing data. J Am Stat Assoc 1995; 90: 106–121.

13.

Cornfield

. A method of estimating comparable rates from clinical data: applications to cancer of the lung, breast and cervix. J Nat Cancer Inst 1951; 11: 1269–1275.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.30 MB