Joint spatial Bayesian modeling for studies combining longitudinal and cross-sectional data

Abstract

Design for intervention studies may combine longitudinal data collected from sampled locations over several survey rounds and cross-sectional data from other locations in the study area. In this case, modeling the impact of the intervention requires an approach that can accommodate both types of data, accounting for the dependence between individuals followed up over time. Inadequate modeling can mask intervention effects, with serious implications for policy making. In this paper we use data from a large-scale larviciding intervention for malaria control implemented in Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania, collected over a period of almost 5 years. We apply a longitudinal Bayesian spatial model to the Dar es Salaam data, combining follow-up and cross-sectional data, treating the correlation in longitudinal observations separately, and controlling for potential confounders. An innovative feature of this modeling is the use of Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process to model random time effects. We contrast the results with other Bayesian modeling formulations, including cross-sectional approaches that consider individual-level random effects to account for subjects followed up in two or more surveys. The longitudinal modeling approach indicates that the intervention significantly reduced the prevalence of malaria infection in Dar es Salaam by 20% whereas the joint model did not suggest significance within the results. Our results suggest that the longitudinal model is to be preferred when longitudinal information is available at the individual level.

Keywords

Intervention malaria Bayesian integrated Laplace approximation joint model longitudinal data spatial

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Moss

Hamapumbu

Kobayashi

. Use of remote sensing to identify spatial risk factors for malaria in a region of declining transmission: A cross-sectional and longitudinal community survey. Malaria J 2011; 10: 163–163.

Fillinger

Kannady

William

. A tool box for operational mosquito larval control: Preliminary results and early lessons from the Urban Malaria Control Programme in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Malaria J 2008; 7: 20–20.

Maheu-Giroux

Castro

. Impact of community-based larviciding on the prevalence of malaria infection in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. PLoS One 2013; 8: e71638–e71638.

Geissbühler

Kannady

Chaki

. Microbial larvicide application by a large-scale, community-based program reduces malaria infection prevalence in urban Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. PLoS One 2009; 4: e5107–e5107.

Dongus

Nyika

Kannady

. Participatory mapping of target areas to enable operational larval source management to suppress malaria vector mosquitoes in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Int J Health Geographics 2007; 6: 37–37.

Castro

Kanamori

Kannady

. The importance of drains for the larval development of lymphatic filariasis and malaria vectors in Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania. PLoS Neglected Trop Dis 2010; 4: e693–e693.

Filmer D and Pritchett LH. Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data – or tears: An application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography 2001; 38(1): 115–132.

Lawson

. Bayesian disease mapping: Hierarchical modeling in spatial epidemiology, 2nd ed. New York: CRC Press, 2013.

Little

Rubin

. Statitsical analysis with missing data, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 2002.

10.

Guttorp

. Stochastic modeling of scientific data, New York: CRC Press, 1995.

11.

Knorr-Held

. Bayesian modelling of inseparable space-time variation in disease risk. Stat Med 2000; 19: 2555–2567.

12.

Besag

York

Mollie

. Bayesian image restoration with two applications in spatial statistics. Ann Inst Stat Math 1991; 43: 59–59.

13.

Gamerman

Lopes

. Markov chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic simulation for Bayesian inference, 2nd ed. New York: CRC Press, 2006.

14.

Rue

Martino

Chopin

. Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations. J R Stat Soc B 2009; 71(2): 319–392.

15.

Blangiardo

Cameletti

Baio

. Spatial and Spatio-temporal models with R-INLA. Spat Spatio-temporal Epidemiol 2013; 4: 33–49.

16.

Lindgren

Rue

Lindstrom

. An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gausian Markov random fields: The stochastic partial differential equation approach. J R Stat Soc B 2011; 73(4): 423–498.

17.

Schrödle

Held

. Spatio-temporal disease mapping using INLA. Environmetrics 2011; 22(6): 725–734.