The attributable fraction is a commonly used measure that quantifies the public health impact of an exposure on an outcome. It was originally defined for binary outcomes, but an extension has recently been proposed for right-censored survival time outcomes; the so-called attributable fraction function. A maximum likelihood estimator of the attributable fraction function has been developed, which requires a model for the outcome. In this paper, we derive a doubly robust estimator of the attributable fraction function. This estimator requires one model for the outcome, and one joint model for the exposure and censoring. The estimator is consistent if either model is correct, not necessarily both.
BaiXTsiatisAAO’BrienSM. Doubly-robust estimators of treatment-specific survival distributions in observational studies with stratified sampling. Biometrics2013; 69: 830–839.
6.
SjölanderA. Estimation of attributable fractions using inverse probability weighting. Stat Methods Med Res2011; 20: 415–428.
7.
SjölanderAVansteelandtS. Doubly robust estimation of attributable fractions. Biostatistics2011; 12: 112–121.
8.
PearlJ. Causality: models, reasoning, and inference, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
9.
TsiatisAA. Semiparametric theory and missing data, New York: Springer, 2006.
10.
PearlJ. On the consistency rule in causal inference: axiom, definition, assumption, or theorem?Epidemiology2010; 21: 872–875.
11.
BreslowN. Discussion of the paper by D R. Cox. J Roy Stat Soc B Met1972; 34: 216–217.
12.
ZhangMSchaubelDE. Contrasting treatment-specific survival using double-robust estimators. Stat Med2012; 31: 4255–4268.
13.
American-Psychiatric-Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Washington DC: APA, 1994.
14.
BaileyALe CouteurAGottesmanI, et al.Autism as a strongly genetic disorder: evidence from a British twin study. Psycholl Med1995; 25: 63–78.
15.
HultmanCMSandinSLevineSZ, et al.Advancing paternal age and risk of autism: new evidence from a population-based study and a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Mol Psychiat2011; 16: 1203–1212.
16.
SandinSNygrenKGIliadouA, et al.Autism and mental retardation among offspring born after in vitro fertilization. JAMA2013; 310: 75–84.
17.
AndersenPKGeskusRBde WitteT, et al.Competing risks in epidemiology: possibilities and pitfalls. Inl J Epidemiol2012; 41: 861–870.
18.
RobinsJM. A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect. Math Modelling1986; 7: 1393–1512.
19.
RobinsJMCausal inference from complex longitudinal data. In: BerkaneM (ed.). Latent variable modeling and applications to causality, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1997, pp. 69–117.
20.
BekaertMVansteelandtSMertensK. Adjusting for time-varying confounding in the subdistribution analysis of a competing risk. Lifetime Data Anal2010; 16: 45–70.
