Correcting for dependent censoring in routine outcome monitoring data by applying the inverse probability censoring weighted estimator

Abstract

Censored data make survival analysis more complicated because exact event times are not observed. Statistical methodology developed to account for censored observations assumes that patients’ withdrawal from a study is independent of the event of interest. However, in practice, some covariates might be associated to both lifetime and censoring mechanism, inducing dependent censoring. In this case, standard survival techniques, like Kaplan–Meier estimator, give biased results. The inverse probability censoring weighted estimator was developed to correct for bias due to dependent censoring. In this article, we explore the use of inverse probability censoring weighting methodology and describe why it is effective in removing the bias. Since implementing this method is highly time consuming and requires programming and mathematical skills, we propose a user friendly algorithm in R. Applications to a toy example and to a medical data set illustrate how the algorithm works. A simulation study was carried out to investigate the performance of the inverse probability censoring weighted estimators in situations where dependent censoring is present in the data. In the simulation process, different sample sizes, strengths of the censoring model, and percentages of censored individuals were chosen. Results show that in each scenario inverse probability censoring weighting reduces the bias induced in the traditional Kaplan–Meier approach where dependent censoring is ignored.

Keywords

Survival analysis informative censoring dependent censoring inverse probability censoring weighted estimator inverse probability weighting

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Robins

Rotnitzky

Recovery of information and adjustment for dependent censoring using surrogate markers. In: Jewell

Dietz

Farewell

(eds). AIDS Epidemiology, Boston: Birkhäuser, 1992, pp. 297–331.

Robins JM. Information recovery and bias adjustment in proportional hazards regression analysis of randomized trials using surrogate markers. In: Proceedings of the biopharmaceutical section, Virginia: American Statistical Association, 1993, pp.24–33.

Robins

Finkelstein

. Correcting for noncompliance and dependent censoring in an aids clinical trial with inverse probability of censoring weighted (IPCW) log-rank tests. Biometrics 2000; 56: 779–788.

Kaplan

Meier

. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457–481.

Kleinbaum

Klein

. Survival analysis: a self-learning text (statistics for biology and health), 3rd ed. New York: Springer, 2012.

R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2008. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org.

Therneau TM. A package for survival analysis in S, 2013. R package version 2.37-4, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival (accessed 13 January 2016).

Therneau

Grambsch

. Modeling survival data: extending the Cox model, New York, NY: Springer, 2000.

Montgomery

Åsberg

. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiat 1979; 134: 382–389.

10.

de Beurs E, den Hollander-Gijsman ME, van Rood YR, et al. Routine outcome monitoring in the Netherlands: practical experiences with a web-based strategy for the assessment of treatment outcome in clinical practice. Clin Psychol Psychother 2011; 18(1): 1–12.

11.

Mooney

. Monte Carlo Simulation (Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no. 07-116), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997.

12.

Bender

Augustin

Blettner

. Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models. Stat Med 2005; 24(11): 1713–1723.

13.

Chang

Gelman

Pagano

. Corrected group prognostic curves and summary statistics. J Chronic Dis 1982; 35: 669–674.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.28 MB