Some basic features of cohort studies are reviewed along with a brief discussion of relative risk estimation procedures. This background, and a discussion of factors influencing cohort study power, provides a context to examine various cohort study design choices, including the choice of study population, the selection of cohort size and follow-up duration, cohort ascertainment and subsampling choices, and decisions concerning validation and reliability substudies. It is noted that confounding issues, and especially issues related to measurement error in the assessment of primary exposure and confounding variables, may have a major influence on the precision and reliability of cohort study analyses. A brief discussion is provided of the role of cohort studies in relation to other observational and experimental research strategies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Howe GR, Freidenreich CM, Jain M., Miller ABA cohort study of fat intake and risk of breast cancer. Journal of theNational Cancer Institute1991; 83: 336-40.
2.
Willett WC, Hunter DJ, Stampfer MJ et al. Dietary fat and fiber in relation to risk of breast cancer. Journal of theAmerican Medical Association1992; 268: 2037-44.
3.
Committee to Review the Health Effects in Vietnam Veterans of Exposure to Herbicides. Veterans and Agent Orange: Health effects of agents used in Vietnam . Washington D.C.: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, 1994.
4.
Environmental Protection Agency Report.Respiratory health effects of passive smoking: Lung cancer and other disorders. National Institutes of Health Publication 93-3605, August, 1993.
Miettinen OSTheoretical epidemiology: principles of occurrence research in medicine. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1985 .
7.
Kelsey JL, Thompson WD, Evans ASMethods in observational epidemiology. New York : Oxford University Press, 1986 .
8.
Rothman KJModern epidemiology. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co., 1986.
9.
Breslow NE, Day NEStatistical methods in cancer research, Volume 2. The design and analysis of cohort studies. Lyon, France: IARC Scientific Publications No. 82, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1987.
10.
Kahn HA, Sempos CTStatistical methods in epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
11.
Checkoway H., Pearce N., Crawford-Brown DJResearch methods in occupational epidemiology. New York : Oxford University Press, 1989.
12.
Willett WCNutritional epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
13.
Morganstern H., Thomas D.Principles of study design in environmental epidemiology. Environmental Health Perspectives1993; suppl 101: 23-38.
14.
Rubin DBBayesian inference for causal effects: the role of randomization. Annals of Statistics1978; 6: 34-58.
15.
Robins J.A graphical approach to the identification and estimation of causal parameters in mortality studies with sustained exposure periods. Journal of Chronic Diseases1987; suppl 2: 139-61.
16.
Greenland S.Randomization, statistics and causal inference . Epidemiology1990; 1: 421-29.
17.
Robins J.The control of confounding by intermediate variables. Statistics in Medicine1989; 8: 679-701.
18.
Greenland S.Cohorts versus dynamic populations: A dissenting view. Journal of Chronic Diseases1986; 39: 565-66.
19.
Miettinen OSResponse. Journal of Chronic Diseases1986; 39: 567.
20.
Poole C.Would vs. should in the definition of secondary study base. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology1990; 43: 1016-17.
21.
Miettinen OSThe concept of secondary base. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology1990; 43: 1017-20.
22.
Greenland S.Response and follow-up bias in cohort studies . American Journal of Epidemiology1977; 106: 184-7.
23.
Kalbfleisch JD , Prentice RLThe statistical analysis of failure time data . New York: Wiley, 1980.
24.
Armitage P., Doll R.Stochastic models for carcinogenesis. Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability IV. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1961; 19-38.
25.
Whittemore AS, Keller JBQuantitative theories of carcinogenesis . Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM) Review1978; 20: 1-30.
26.
Moolgavkar SH, Knudson A.Mutation and cancer: a model for human carcinogenesis . Journal of the National Cancer Institute1981; 66: 1037-52.
27.
Cox DRRegression models and life tables (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 1972; 34: 187-220.
28.
Miettinen OS , Cook EFConfounding: essence and detection. American Journal of Epidemiology1981; 114: 593-603.
29.
Boivin JF, Wacholder S.Conditions for confounding of the risk ratio and the odds ratio. American Journal of Epidemiology1985; 121: 152-58.
30.
Greenland S. , Robins JMIdentifiability, exchangeability, and epidemiological confounding. International Journal of Epidemiology1986; 15: 412-18.
31.
Greenland S.Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses. American Journal of Epidemiology1987; 125: 761-68.
Casagrande JT, Pike MC, Smith PGAn improved approximate formula for calculating sample sizes for comparing two binomial distributions . Biometrics1978; 34: 483-86.
34.
Fleiss JL, Tytun A., Ury UKA simple approximation for calculating sample sizes for comparing independent proportions. Biometrics1980; 36: 343-46.
35.
Whittemore ASSample size for logistic regression with small response probabilities. Journal of the American Statistical Association1981; 76: 27-32.
36.
Brown CC, Green SBAdditional power computations for designing comparative Poisson trials . American Journal of Epidemiology1982; 115: 752-58.
37.
Greenland S.Power, sample size and smallest detectable effect determination for multivariate studies. Statistics in Medicine1985; 4: 117-27.
38.
Self SG, Mauritsen RH, Ohara J.Power calculations for likelihood ratio tests in generalized linear models . Biometrics1992; 48: 31-9.
39.
Rossouw J., Finnegan LP, Harlan WR, Pinn VW, Clifford C., McGowan JA. The evolution of the Women's Health Initiative: perspectives from theNIH. Journal of the American Medical Women's Association1995; 50: 50-55.
40.
Whittemore AS, McMillan A.Analysing occupational cohort data: application to US uranium miners . In: Prentice RL, Whittemore AS eds. Environmental epidemiology: risk assessment . Philadelphia: SIAM, 1982; 65-81.
41.
Walter SD, Irwig LMEstimation of test error rates, disease prevalence and relative risk from misclassified data: a review. Journal ofClinical Epidemiology1988; 41: 923-7.
Kushi LH, Sellers TA, Potter JD et al. Dietary fat and postmenopausal breast cancer. Journal of theNational Cancer Institute1992; 84: 1092-99.
44.
Stemmerman GN, Nomura Amy, Heilbrun LKDietary fat and risk of colorectal cancer . Cancer Research1984 ; 44: 4633-7.
45.
Prentice RL , Pepe M., Self SGDietary fat and breast cancer: a quantitative assessment of the epidemiologic literature and a discussion of methodologic issues. Cancer Research1989 ; 49: 3147-56.
46.
Prentice RLDietary fat reduction as a hypothesis for the prevention of postmenopausal breast cancer, and a discussion of hypothesis testing research strategies . In: Diet and breast cancer. Edited under auspices of the American Institute for Cancer Research. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 364. New York: Plenum Press, 1994; 25-33.
47.
Riboli E.Nutrition and cancer: background and rationale of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Annals of Oncology1992; 3: 783-91.
48.
Multiple RiskFactor Intervention Trial (MRFIT) Research Group. Multiple risk factor intervention trial: risk factor changes and mortality results. Journal of theAmerican Medical Association1982; 248: 1465-77.
49.
Lipid Research Clinic Program: The Lipid Research Clinic Coronary Primary Prevention Trial Results I. Reduction in incidence of coronary heart disease. Journal of the American Medical Association1984; 251: 351-64.
50.
Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group.Five year findings of the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program I. Reductions in mortality of persons with high blood pressure, including mild hypertension. Journal of the American Medical Association1979; 242: 2562-71.
51.
Fried LP, Borhani N., Enright P. et al. for the Cardiovascular Health Study Research Group (CHS).The cardiovascular health study: design and rationale. Annals of Epidemiology1991; 1: 263-76.
52.
Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Oral Contraception Study.Oral contraceptives and health: an interim report . London: Pittman, 1974.
53.
Prentice RL , Sheppard L.Dietary fat and cancer: consistency of the epidemiologic data and disease prevention that may follow from a practical reduction in fat consumption. Cancer Causes and Control1990; 1: 87-97.
54.
Prentice RL , Shimizu Y., Lin CH et al. Serial blood pressure measurements and cardiovascular disease in a Japanese cohort. American Journal of Epidemiology1982; 116: 1-28.
55.
Prentice RLOn the ability of blood pressure effects to explain the relationship between oral contraceptives and cardiovascular disease . American Journal of Epidemiology1988; 127: 213-19.
56.
Prentice RLA case-cohort design for epidemiologic cohort studies and disease prevention trials. Biometrika1986; 73: 1-11.
57.
Liddell Fdk , McDonald JC, Thomas DCMethods for cohort analysis: appraisal by application to asbestos mining. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 1977; 140: 469-90.
58.
Prentice RL , Breslow NERetrospective studies and failure time models . Biometrika1978; 65: 153-58.
59.
Langholz B. , Thomas DCNested case-control and case-cohort methods for sampling from a cohort: a critical comparison. American Journal of Epidemiology1990; 31: 169-76.
60.
Langholz B. , Thomas DCEfficiency of cohort sampling designs: some surprising results. Biometrics1991; 47: 1553-71.
61.
White JEA two-stage design for the study of the relationship between a rare exposure and a rare disease. American Journal of Epidemiology1982; 115: 119-28.
62.
Walker AMAnamorphic analysis: sampling and estimation for covariate effects when both exposure and disease are known. Biometrics1982; 38: 1025-32.
Flanders WD, Greenland S.Analytic methods for two-stage case-control studies and other stratified designs . Statistics in Medicine1991; 10: 739-47.
66.
Greenland S.Statistical uncertainty due to misclassification: implications for validation substudies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology1988; 41: 1167-74.
67.
Marshall RJValidation study methods for estimating exposure proportions and odds ratios with misclassified data. Journal ofClinical Epidemiology1990; 43: 941-7.
68.
Spiegelman D., Gray R.Cost efficient study designs for binary response data with Gaussian covariate measurement error. Biometrics1991; 47: 851-70.
69.
Pepe M., Fleming TRA nonparametric method for dealing with mismeasured covariate data . Journal of the American Statistical Association1991; 86: 108-13.
70.
Carroll RJ, Wand MPSemiparametric estimation in logistic measurement error models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 1991; 53: 573-85.
71.
Lee LF, Sepanski JHEstimation in linear and nonlinear errors in variables models using validation data. Journal of the American Statistical Association1995; 90: 130-40.
72.
Whittemore AS, Keller JBApproximations for regression with covariate measurement error. Journal of the American Statistical Association1988; 83: 1057-66.
73.
Prentice RLCovariate measurement errors and parameter estimation in Cox's failure time regression model. Biometrika1982; 69: 331-42.
74.
Greenland S. , Kleinbaum DGCorrecting for misclassification in two-way tables and matched-pair studies. International Journal of Epidemiology1983; 12: 93-97.
75.
Kupper LLEffects of the use of unreliable surrogate variables on the validity of epidemiologic research studies. American Journal of Epidemiology1984; 120: 643-48.
76.
Whittemore ASErrors-in-variables regression using Stein estimates. American Statistician1989; 43: 226-8.
77.
Rosner B., Willett WC, Spiegelman D.Correction of logistic regression relative risk estimates and confidence intervals for systematic within-person measurement error. Statistics in Medicine1989; 8: 1051-70.
78.
Pierce DA, Stram D., Vaeth M.Allowing for random errors in radiation dose estimates for the atomic bomb survivors. Radiation Research1990; 126: 36-42.
79.
Carroll RJ, Stefanski LAApproximate quasi-likelihood estimation in models with surrogate predictors . Journal of the American Statistical Association1990; 85: 652-63.
80.
Armstrong BGThe effect of measurement error on relative risk regressions. American Journal of Epidemiology1991; 132: 1176-84.
81.
Clayton DGModels for the analysis of cohort and case-control studies with inaccurately measured exposures. In: Dwyer JH, Lippert P, Feinleib M, Hoffmeister H eds. Statistical models for longitudinal studies of health. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992: 301-31.
82.
Thomas D., Stram D., Dwyer J.Exposure measurement error: influence on exposure-disease relationships and methods of correction. Annual Review of PublicHealth1993; 14: 69-93.
83.
Sepanski JH , Knickerbocker R., Carrol RJA semiparametric correction for attenuation . Journal of the American Statistical Association1994;89:1366-73.
84.
Armstrong B. , Whittemore AS, Howe GRAnalysis of case-control data with covariate measurement error: application to diet and colon cancer . Statistics in Medicine1989; 8: 1151-64.
85.
Willett WC, Sampson L., Stampfer MJ et al. Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. American Journal of Epidemiology1985; 122: 51-65.
86.
Livingstone Mbe, Prentice AM, Strain JJ et al. Accuracy of weighted dietary records in studies of diet and health. British Medical Journal1990; 300: 708-12.
87.
Bandini LG, Schoeller DA, Cyr HN, Dietz WHValidity of reported energy intake in obese and non obese adolescents . American Journal of Clinical Nutrition1990; 52: 421-25.
88.
Lichtman SW , Pisarka K., Berman ER et al. Discrepancy between self-reported and actual calorie intake and exercise in obese subjects. New England Journal of Medicine1992; 327: 1893-8.
89.
Sheppard L. , Prentice RLOn the reliability and precision of within and between population estimates of relative risk parameters. Biometrics1995; 51: 853-63.
90.
Prentice RL , Sheppard L.Aggregate data studies of disease risk factors . Biometrika1995; 82: 113-25.
91.
Piantadosi S., Byar DP, Green SBThe ecological fallacy . American Journal of Epidemiology1988; 127: 893-904.
92.
Greenland S. , Morganstern H.Ecological bias, confounding and effect modification . International Journal of Epidemiology1989 ; 18: 269-74.
93.
Brenner H., Savitz DA, Jöckel KH, Greenland S.The effects of non-differential exposure misclassification in ecological studies . American Journal of Epidemiology1992; 135: 85-95.
94.
Greenland S. , Robins J.Invited commentary: ecologic studies. Biases, misconceptions and counterexamples. American Journal of Epidemiology1994; 139: 747-60.
