Suggestions for transforming ecological sustainability into operative social choice mechanisms can be viewed through the bifocal lens of limits on, and opportunities for, the ecological state. Using lines of reasoning brought in from the comparative study of environmental policy, this article tries to stake out how far the ecological state can go in pursuing objectives of sustainable development without intruding on values and objectives fundamental to democracy. The article discusses social choice mechanisms in terms of the ecological state's authority, management capacities, effectiveness, and legitimacy, drawing up the image of the ecological state as a ‘green fist in a velvet glove’ with the ultimate objective of integrating ‘ecological’ evaluations into the public mind so that they become as ‘natural’ as those ‘economic’ criteria presently applied. Concluding that such ‘ecological’ consciousness involves a great leap in ecological information processing and dissemination within and throughout societies, the article invokes the sustainability and success of democratic social welfare states which base authoritative command on enlightened debate and deliberation as evidence that such a leap can be successfully made through processes of informed consensus.
AndrewsC. J.1998. ‘Environmental business strategy: Corporate leaders’ perceptions’, Society and Natural Resources11: 531–540.
2.
BackhausJ. G.1997. ‘Subsidiarity and ecologically based taxation: A European constitutional perspective’, Public Choice90: 281–310.
3.
BakerS. (1998) ‘The evolution of European Union environmental policy’, in BakerS.. (eds) The Politics of Sustainable Development. Theory, policy and practice within the European Union, pp. 91–106. London: Routledge.
4.
BurnheimJ.1995. ‘Power-trading and the environment’, Environmental Politics4: 49–65.
5.
CaldwellL. K.1990. Between Two Worlds. Science, the environmental movement, and policy choice.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
ChristoffP.1996. ‘Ecological citizens and ecologically guided democracy’, in DohertyB. and de GeusM.M. (eds) Democracy and Green Political Thought. Sustainability, Rights and Citizenship, pp. 151–169. London: Routledge.
7.
CohenM.1998. ‘Science and the environment: Assessing cultural capacity for ecological modernization’, Public Understanding of Science7: 149–167.
8.
CrepazM.M.L.1995. ‘Explaining variations of air pollution levels: Political institutions and their impact on environmental policy-making’, Environmental Politics4: 391–414.
9.
DenteB.1995. ‘Introduction: The globalization of environmental policy and the search for new instruments’, in DenteB. (ed), Environmental Policy in Search of New Instruments, pp. 1–20. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10.
DobsonA.1990. Green Political Thought.London: Routledge.
11.
EckerbergK. and LaffertyW. M.1997. ‘Comparative perspectives on evaluation and explanation’, in LaffertyW. M. and EckerbergK. (eds), From Earth Summit to Local Forum. Studies of Local Agenda 21 in Europe, pp. 267–293. Oslo: ProSus.
12.
EckersleyR.1995. ‘Markets, the state and the environment: An overview’, in EckersleyR. (ed), Markets, the State and the Environment. Towards Integration, pp. 7–45. Melbourne: Macmillan.
13.
GibsonC.. 1998. Scaling Issues in the Social Sciences.Bonn: International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change (IHDP) Working Paper No. 1.
14.
HajerM. A.1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse. Ecological Modernisation and the Policy Process.Oxford: Clarendon.
15.
JahnD.1998. ‘Environmental performance and policy regimes: Explaining variations in 18 OECD-countries’, Policy Sciences31: 107–131.
16.
JänickeM.1997. ‘The political system's capacity for environmental policy’, in JänickeM. and WeidnerH. (eds) National Environmental Policies. A Comparative Study of Capacity-Building, pp. 1–24. Berlin: Springer.
17.
JänickeM. and WeidnerH.1997. ‘Summary: Global environmental policy learning’ in JänickeM. and WeidnerH. (eds), National Environmental Policies. A Comparative Study of Capacity-Building, pp. 299–314. Berlin: Springer.
18.
JänickeM. and JörgensH.1998. ‘National environmental policy planning in OECD countries: Preliminary lessons from cross-national comparisons’, Environmental Politics7: 27–54.
19.
JansenA.-I., OslandO. and HanfK.1998. ‘Environmental challenges and institutional changes. An interpretation of the development of environmental policy in Western Europe’, in HanfK. K. and JansenA.-I., (eds), Governance and Environmental Quality. Environmental Administration, Policy and Politics in Western Europé, pp. 277–326. London: Longman.
20.
KnoepfelP.2001. ‘Natural resource quotas and contracts: A new institutional regime for our common future’, in KnoepfelP.Environmental Policies 1980 – 2000, Basel: Helbing & Lichtenhahn (Reihe Ökologie & Gesellschaft, Band 17, forthcoming).
21.
LaffertyW. M. and MeadowcroftJ.2000. ‘Patterns of governmental engagement’, in LaffertyW. M and MeadowcroftJ., (eds.), Implementing Sustainable Development. Strategies and Initiatives in High Consumption Societies, pp. 337–421. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
LaffontJ. J. and TiroleJ. ‘The politics of government decision-making: A theory of regulatory capture’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106: 1089–1127.
23.
LanghelleO.2000. ‘Why ecological modernization and sustainable development should not be conflated’, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning2: 303–322.
24.
LigteringenJ. J.1999. The Feasibility of Dutch Environmental Policy Instruments.Enschede: Twente University Press.
25.
LundqvistL. J.2000. ‘Capacity-building or social construction? Explaining Swedish environmental policy change’, GeoForum31: 21–32.
26.
LundqvistL. J.2001. ‘Implementation from above? The ecology of Sweden's new environmental governance’, Governance14: 309–337.
27.
MarshallT.1998. ‘Dimensions of sustainable development and scales of policy-making’, in BakerS.. (eds) The Politics of Sustainable Development. Theory, policy and practice within the European Union, pp. 175–197. London: Routledge.
28.
MeadowcroftJ.1997a. ‘Planning for sustainable development: Insights from the literature of political science’, European Journal of Political Research31: 427–454.
29.
MeadowcroftJ.1997b. ‘Planning, democracy and the challenge of sustainable development’, International Political Science Review18: 167–189.
30.
MoffatI.1996. ‘An evaluation of ‘Environmental Space’ as the basis for sustainable Europe’, International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology3: 49–69.
31.
NorthD.C.1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
OphulsW. and BoyanA. S.Jr.1992. Ecology and the Politics of Scarcity Revisited.New York: W. H. Freeman.
33.
O'RiordanT. and VoiseyH. (1997) ‘The political economy of sustainable development’, Environmental Politics6: 1–23.
34.
PritchardL.Jr.. 1998. The Problem of Fit between Ecosystems and Institutions.Bonn: International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change (IHDP) Working Paper No. 2.
35.
Shrader-FrechetteK.S.1993. Burying Uncertainty.Berkeley: University of California Press.
36.
SmeetsE. and WeteringsR.1999. Environmental indicators: Typology and overview.Copenhagen: EEA, Technical Report no 25.
37.
TaylorP.1986. Respect for Nature. A Theory of Environmental Ethics.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
38.
RydinY.1999. ‘Can we talk ourselves into sustainability?’, Environmental Values8: 467–484.
39.
YangW.1998. ‘Ecolabelling: Its role in promoting sustainable production and consumption’, paper presented at the International Symposium on Policy Instruments for Sustainable Consumption and Production: The Search for Effective Steering, Oslo, November 5–7.
